• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Trials of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito: Part 26

Status
Not open for further replies.
As Andrea Vogt famously said, these are all side shows.

That's all you have left, and they aren't going your way any more than the main event did. These are dark days indeed for the PGP.

Do you think there is anything left of this case other than the occasional side show? Are you hanging everything now on Amanda's case to the ECHR? As Bill points out, the PGP keeps talking about how things will fall horribly wrong for Amanda and Raffaele and yet each time they fall the other way.

The PGP remind me of the Black Knight in the Holy Grail. You've lost the battle, floundering around with no arms or legs, yet you continue to claim you'll win. As Arthur so aptly says... You're a looney!
 
The pro-guilt, pro-Mignini PR campaign reboots.

Next excuse - it was just a flesh-wound.

The campaign continuez, "nothing to see, move on."

AKA - O look, squirrel.

My complaint is this - we were promised that Mignini's defamation suit would finally expose all the lies. Now it's just a side show.

I think I may have whiplash.

There is more to this than meets the eye.

Well, there wasn't a proper hearing, was there? If, as was reported, the parties were ordered to try to settle, it could be Mignini was paid off, but in strict confidence (a gagging clause) which is very common, where neither party admits liability or claims victory. However, as it emanated as a court process, the person getting the settlement has to consent to calling off the court process (usually part of the settlement agreement). However, that has to be done via a court hearing.

As nothing happened in court apart from a judge sitting alone (no tribunal of judges, as is usual) who dismissed the case, it does suggest it was settled outside court.

That's my 2p worth (VAT free).
 
This just posted on TJMK Front page:

Breaking news. In statement publishable in due course Sollecito & Gumbel admit that passages in "Honor Bound" claiming Dr Mignini was pressing RS to sell out Amanda Knox were in fact lies. Prosecution in Florence court stated aggravated defamation was definitely committed, but Dr Mignini is said to be satisfied and drops criminal lawsuit (his choice, no acquittal). Augers bad for serial defamer Knox and publishers of both books.

Hmmm... and yet, the Italian article I linked stated

New absolution for Raffaele Sollecito , the young Puglia for years in the middle of a complex legal affair, the one linked to the homicide in Perugia of English student Meredith Kercher. Already definitively abolished years ago by the murder charge, today the sole judge of Florence has absolved it "because the fact does not exist" in a proceeding born following the publication in 2013 of the book "Honor bound, my travel all 'hell and back with Amanda Knox'. Raffaele Sollecito had been sentenced for trial by police forces in connection with some passages of the unpublished book in Italy: that book is a story of the criminal case who has seen him star in November 2007, after the discovery of the corpse of Meredith Kercher in the house of via Della Pergola 7 in Perugia. A sentence of acquittal has also arrived for American writer Andrew Gumbel, co-author of the volume. Solicitude was also accused of defamation against the magistrate of Perugia Giuliano Mignini who has however lodged the lawsuit.
 
The pro guilt site states that

"Dr Mignini is said to be satisfied and drops criminal lawsuit (his choice, no acquittal). Augers bad for serial defamer Knox and publishers of both books."

I suppose it is the so called defamation of the police for which Sollecito and Gumbel were acquitted, whereas Mignini just withdrew the lawsuit?

The news article quoted in earlier posts says:

"Sollecito was also accused of defamation against the magistrate of Perugia Giuliano Mignini who lodged the lawsuit. The proceedings against the Puglia engineer {Sollecito} were therefore also closed for this charge"

The guilt site is surely clutching at straws here :"Augers bad for serial defamer Knox and publishers of both books". (Apparently Sollecito and Gumbel will be releasing statement about their "lies".)
 
Last edited:
The pro guilt site states that

"Dr Mignini is said to be satisfied and drops criminal lawsuit (his choice, no acquittal). Augers bad for serial defamer Knox and publishers of both books."

I suppose it is the so called defamation of the police for which Sollecito and Gumbel were acquitted, whereas Mignini just withdrew the lawsuit?

The news article quoted in earlier posts says:

"Sollecito was also accused of defamation against the magistrate of Perugia Giuliano Mignini who lodged the lawsuit. The proceedings against the Puglia engineer {Sollecito} were therefore also closed for this charge"

The guilt site is surely clutching at straws here :"Augers bad for serial defamer Knox and publishers of both books". (Apparently Sollecito and Gumbel will be releasing statement about their "lies".)

The news article makes no mention that the Mignini defamation lawsuit was settled apart from the police suit and out of court. I would think it would, if it had been.
 
The PGP spin on the recent acquittal of Raffaele Sollecito for criminal defamation of the police is hilarious.

How could a settlement with Mignini, who rode the criminal case with a civil law suit, resolve the criminal case against the police? What would the settlement be? What did Mignini pay in the settlement?

And, in Italy, the single-judge court is the standard one for lesser crimes. See the section, "Judges of the trial" in:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_Code_of_Criminal_Procedure
 
This just posted on TJMK Front page:



Hmmm... and yet, the Italian article I linked stated

Apparently, we PIP are being taken in by believing the fake news in the failing traditional media. The alternate facts (aka lies) are the ones to be believed, nowadays.

Here, however, is another article which claims there was a trial with an acquitta. Note that the specification for the acquittal is that the "fact (or act) {of the alleged crime} does not exist":

Caso Meredith Kercher, Sollecito assolto per diffamazione

Era accusato di diffamazione nei confronti delle forze di polizia in relazione a quanto affermato nel libro Honor bound, pubblicato negli Usa assieme al co-autore Andrew Gumbel. Ma Raffaele Sollecito è stato assolto dal giudice unico di Firenze perché "il fatto non sussiste" nella giornata di oggi, martedì 24 ottobre. Cade anche l'accusa di diffamazione nei confronti di Giuliamo Mignini, magistrato di Perugia che ha rimesso la querela. Nel libro, dal sottotitolo 'Il mio viaggio all'inferno e ritorno con Amanda Knox', Sollecito ripercorreva i fatti di Perugia in merito all'omicidio di Meredith Kercher. Un'unica copia pervenuta in Italia del libro, regalata dallo stesso Sollecito al professore universitario che l'aveva seguito nella laurea, era stata sequestrata, poi il volume è tornato nelle mani del legittimo proprietario.

Source: http://www.gonews.it/2017/10/24/caso-meredith-kercher-sollecito-diffamazione/


Google translation with my assitance:

Case Meredith Kercher, Sollecito acquitted of defamation

He was accused of defaming police forces in relation to what was stated in the book Honor bound, published in the US along with co-author Andrew Gumbel. But Raffaele Sollecito was acquitted by a single-judge court of Florence because "the fact [or act] {of the alleged crime} does not exist" in {the newspaper} Today's Day, Tuesday, October 24. The allegation {against Sollecito} of the defamation of Giuliamo Mignini, magistrate of Perugia, who lodged the complaint, also falls. In the book, from the subtitle 'My Trip to Hell and Return with Amanda Knox', Sollecito traced the facts of Perugia about the murder of Meredith Kercher. A single copy in Italy of the book, given by Sollecito himself to the university professor who had supervised him in obtaining his degree, had been seized, then the volume was returned to the hands of the legitimate owner.
 
Last edited:
Apparently, we PIP are being taken in by believing the fake news in the failing traditional media. The alternate facts (aka lies) are the ones to be believed, nowadays.

Here, however, is another article which claims there was a trial with an acquitta. Note that the specification for the acquittal is that the "fact (or act) {of the alleged crime} does not exist":

Caso Meredith Kercher, Sollecito assolto per diffamazione

Era accusato di diffamazione nei confronti delle forze di polizia in relazione a quanto affermato nel libro Honor bound, pubblicato negli Usa assieme al co-autore Andrew Gumbel. Ma Raffaele Sollecito è stato assolto dal giudice unico di Firenze perché "il fatto non sussiste" nella giornata di oggi, martedì 24 ottobre. Cade anche l'accusa di diffamazione nei confronti di Giuliamo Mignini, magistrato di Perugia che ha rimesso la querela. Nel libro, dal sottotitolo 'Il mio viaggio all'inferno e ritorno con Amanda Knox', Sollecito ripercorreva i fatti di Perugia in merito all'omicidio di Meredith Kercher. Un'unica copia pervenuta in Italia del libro, regalata dallo stesso Sollecito al professore universitario che l'aveva seguito nella laurea, era stata sequestrata, poi il volume è tornato nelle mani del legittimo proprietario.

Source: http://www.gonews.it/2017/10/24/caso-meredith-kercher-sollecito-diffamazione/


Google translation with my assitance:

Case Meredith Kercher, Sollecito acquitted of defamation

He was accused of defaming police forces in relation to what was stated in the book Honor bound, published in the US along with co-author Andrew Gumbel. But Raffaele Sollecito was acquitted by a single-judge court of Florence because "the fact [or act] {of the alleged crime} does not exist" in {the newspaper} Today's Day, Tuesday, October 24. The allegation {against Sollecito} of the defamation of Giuliamo Mignini, magistrate of Perugia, who lodged the complaint, also falls. In the book, from the subtitle 'My Trip to Hell and Return with Amanda Knox', Sollecito traced the facts of Perugia about the murder of Meredith Kercher. A single copy in Italy of the book, given by Sollecito himself to the university professor who had supervised him in obtaining his degree, had been seized, then the volume was returned to the hands of the legitimate owner.

I think TJMK's reference to the Titanic is appropriate...only they're the ones whose arguments have hit the iceberg.

I look forward to seeing how else this will be spun. You know it's coming.
 
Since the lawsuit has been adjudicated in RS's favor, I believe that clears the way for the book to be sold in Italy. Correct?
 
There is more to this than meets the eye.

Well, there wasn't a proper hearing, was there? If, as was reported, the parties were ordered to try to settle, it could be Mignini was paid off, but in strict confidence (a gagging clause) which is very common, where neither party admits liability or claims victory. However, as it emanated as a court process, the person getting the settlement has to consent to calling off the court process (usually part of the settlement agreement). However, that has to be done via a court hearing.

As nothing happened in court apart from a judge sitting alone (no tribunal of judges, as is usual) who dismissed the case, it does suggest it was settled outside court.

That's my 2p worth (VAT free).

Holy smokes! Talk about being in denial.
 
IIRC the defamation charge against Knox's parents is still active, despite Knox being herself acquitted on essentially the same charge.

Each case is tried on its own merits.

If the parents have been charged, then it can't be dismissed without a hearing, even if it is only 'in chambers'. IOW it needs a sitting judge to 'dismiss' the charge.

Or the statute of limitations to run out.
 
From Il Giornale:


Absolution arrived for Raffaele Sollecito, who before the magistrature in Florence had to respond to the charge of defamation to law enforcement, accused of certain passages of "Honor bound, my journey to hell and return with Amanda Knox" .
For the Tuscan judge "the fact does not exist" and therefore the passages of the memoir published in the United States on the criminal case related to the murder of the ingrede student Meredith Kercher, are not enough to support the accusation against him.

Yesterday the writer Andrew Gumbel, who with Sollecito had written the book, never went out to Italy. Inside a reconstruction of the investigations carried out by magistrate Giuliano Mignini considered "injurious". The judge had filed a lawsuit for some of Honor-bound songs, and then retracted, leaving only the accusation of defamation, which came to an end today.

"Another page has been linked to the painful affair of Meredith Kercher's murder and Raffaele has still been declared alien to the facts," commented after the sentence one of the two lawyers who followed Sollecito, Alfredo Brizioli.
http://www.ilgiornale.it/news/crona...cusa-vilipendio-forze-dellordine-1456263.html
 
They might want to just let that one expire without any further embarrassment, although I hope it is heard and thrown out. It's good to continually remind the public of the type of arrogant jerk Mignini truly is.

Congrats to Raffaele and Andrew... fantastic news. I guess the few remaining PGP will be sulking for a few days. Love it!

Why is it, 'fantastic'?

Is either of Raff or Gumby going to give you a 'cut' of their book earnings? Or even deign to give you a word of thanks for all your fervent campaigning on their behalf?

What's that you say?

The silence is deafening.
 
That's all you have left, and they aren't going your way any more than the main event did. These are dark days indeed for the PGP.

Do you think there is anything left of this case other than the occasional side show? Are you hanging everything now on Amanda's case to the ECHR? As Bill points out, the PGP keeps talking about how things will fall horribly wrong for Amanda and Raffaele and yet each time they fall the other way.

The PGP remind me of the Black Knight in the Holy Grail. You've lost the battle, floundering around with no arms or legs, yet you continue to claim you'll win. As Arthur so aptly says... You're a looney!

As Mama Cass famously said, 'the darkest hour is just before dawn'.
 
The pro guilt site states that

"Dr Mignini is said to be satisfied and drops criminal lawsuit (his choice, no acquittal). Augers bad for serial defamer Knox and publishers of both books."

I suppose it is the so called defamation of the police for which Sollecito and Gumbel were acquitted, whereas Mignini just withdrew the lawsuit?

The news article quoted in earlier posts says:

"Sollecito was also accused of defamation against the magistrate of Perugia Giuliano Mignini who lodged the lawsuit. The proceedings against the Puglia engineer {Sollecito} were therefore also closed for this charge"

The guilt site is surely clutching at straws here :"Augers bad for serial defamer Knox and publishers of both books". (Apparently Sollecito and Gumbel will be releasing statement about their "lies".)

It augurs badly for Knox and the ghostwriter Kulman (_sp?) as they ,too, will have to settle with Mignini out of court or go through a trial.

Given the book is riddled with whoppers, there is no way Kulman, at least, will want to risk it, nor HarperCollins.
 
Why is it, 'fantastic'?

Is either of Raff or Gumby going to give you a 'cut' of their book earnings? Or even deign to give you a word of thanks for all your fervent campaigning on their behalf?

What's that you say?

The silence is deafening.

1) "Gumby"? Trump, is that you?

2) a 'cut' of their book earnings". Oh, the irony.

3) And yes, we have been thanked several times for our support.
 
The PGP spin on the recent acquittal of Raffaele Sollecito for criminal defamation of the police is hilarious.

How could a settlement with Mignini, who rode the criminal case with a civil law suit, resolve the criminal case against the police? What would the settlement be? What did Mignini pay in the settlement?

And, in Italy, the single-judge court is the standard one for lesser crimes. See the section, "Judges of the trial" in:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_Code_of_Criminal_Procedure

Gumbel and Sollecito will have had to dig deep into their pockets to wriggle out of this one.
 
Apparently, we PIP are being taken in by believing the fake news in the failing traditional media. The alternate facts (aka lies) are the ones to be believed, nowadays.

Here, however, is another article which claims there was a trial with an acquitta. Note that the specification for the acquittal is that the "fact (or act) {of the alleged crime} does not exist":

Caso Meredith Kercher, Sollecito assolto per diffamazione

Era accusato di diffamazione nei confronti delle forze di polizia in relazione a quanto affermato nel libro Honor bound, pubblicato negli Usa assieme al co-autore Andrew Gumbel. Ma Raffaele Sollecito è stato assolto dal giudice unico di Firenze perché "il fatto non sussiste" nella giornata di oggi, martedì 24 ottobre. Cade anche l'accusa di diffamazione nei confronti di Giuliamo Mignini, magistrato di Perugia che ha rimesso la querela. Nel libro, dal sottotitolo 'Il mio viaggio all'inferno e ritorno con Amanda Knox', Sollecito ripercorreva i fatti di Perugia in merito all'omicidio di Meredith Kercher. Un'unica copia pervenuta in Italia del libro, regalata dallo stesso Sollecito al professore universitario che l'aveva seguito nella laurea, era stata sequestrata, poi il volume è tornato nelle mani del legittimo proprietario.

Source: http://www.gonews.it/2017/10/24/caso-meredith-kercher-sollecito-diffamazione/


Google translation with my assitance:

Case Meredith Kercher, Sollecito acquitted of defamation

He was accused of defaming police forces in relation to what was stated in the book Honor bound, published in the US along with co-author Andrew Gumbel. But Raffaele Sollecito was acquitted by a single-judge court of Florence because "the fact [or act] {of the alleged crime} does not exist" in {the newspaper} Today's Day, Tuesday, October 24. The allegation {against Sollecito} of the defamation of Giuliamo Mignini, magistrate of Perugia, who lodged the complaint, also falls. In the book, from the subtitle 'My Trip to Hell and Return with Amanda Knox', Sollecito traced the facts of Perugia about the murder of Meredith Kercher. A single copy in Italy of the book, given by Sollecito himself to the university professor who had supervised him in obtaining his degree, had been seized, then the volume was returned to the hands of the legitimate owner.

'The fact does not exist' is the standard wording on a case being dismissed AIUI.
 
It augurs badly for Knox and the ghostwriter Kulman (_sp?) as they ,too, will have to settle with Mignini out of court or go through a trial.

Given the book is riddled with whoppers, there is no way Kulman, at least, will want to risk it, nor HarperCollins.

No media article states that Mignini settled out of court with Sollecito. You're clinging to that last desperate hope more tightly than Jack clung to that door in Titanic. He still went down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom