• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged A God of Love / The Living God

The link also appears to be off topic because, near as anyone can tell, there's nothing on it related to the topic. Admittedly the topic of this thread is a bit difficult to pin down.



A South African man thinks he’s a god-mother to all humanity. His one piece of evidence is the claim that a drunk guy once called him “mother.”

That’s pretty much it.
 
A South African man thinks he’s a god-mother to all humanity. His one piece of evidence is the claim that a drunk guy once called him “mother.”

That’s pretty much it.

Also something about a random FB page he likes to spam proves something about his claims.
 
Also something about a random FB page he likes to spam proves something about his claims.

There's clearly a photograph (of JA and Zola) somewhere on the FB page, that none of us have access to, that JA is referencing. That said, I highly doubt whether even that will be of any value as proof of whatever he is contending that it means, other than the fact that he's managed to get one or two people in the community to refer to him as 'mother'. :rolleyes:

Cue patronising and/or passive aggressive response from JA when he finally catches up with the thread and/or comes back from wherever he is currently claiming to be god/banned and/or the mother of everyone and/or winning every argument and eating all the eggs.
 
Last edited:
Dude, he just compared your arguments to poo flung by an animal.

So what is the comparison?

He's not conceding defeat in a debate with you.

Well then he should keep it up.

He's saying you don't have any arguments to actually offer in a debate. From what I've seen he's right. Your claims to deity are supported by bald assertions on your part and the unsubstantiated claim that you have what, one follower?

You should go into the arguments. Meaning you will have to ask my "one follower" and those with the "thumbs" up. And then there is the ghosts from Robertson hiding away. And then you should check out God's forum if He really is in charge and then you can ask the reasons for me being banned. And then you will have the full picture.

I already gave you the full picture but you do not believe me so it is up to you to proof me wrong.


I assert that I am a sex god. I am a lover of incomparable skill, creativity and perversion. I drive women who thought themselves non-orgasmic to multiple orgasms. I am libido incarnate, desire personified. Were I to write my exploits it would make the Marquis de Sade blush. Lady Chatterley would toss aside her gardener in an instant for a single night with me. Any woman you've ever been with would forget your very existence after I tended to their deepest desires.

Interesting. Can you tell us more.

Prove me wrong Johanabrahams. Prove me wrong. :D

Not difficult at all. I will just ask for the evidence. So give me some names. People I can contact. Specially there in your area where you are living. Maybe a wife, child or other relative? Or some friends you are working with. Specially people that would not mind coming here and tell us more about your claims.
 
This is where I have the advantage over you.

Show me.

I can PROVE I'm a sex god, assuming any woman willing to test the claim can get my wife's permission to borrow me. :eek:

Good. You have a wife. How can I contact her?


You? You keep repeating your claim again and again, but never offer any proof. If you are a deity you're a singularly impotent one. You raise your flaccid divine rod to the heavens, or least you try to, and when you call down judgement upon your enemies all you can muster is a sad twitch of action, motivated more by your need to urinate than divine emission. Zeus looks on, shaking his head sadly.

Is there a supernatural equivalent to Viagra?

Divine Spanish Fly?

Yep. And there is the evidence and all the contact details.

Clearly your divine powers are at a low ebb, if the best you can muster is getting a guy drunk enough to call you "mom" in an inebriated mumble. As Shakespeare noted in Macbeth, alcohol increases desire but takes away from performance. Perhaps you should lay off the sauce before you try convincing anyone of your divinity again.

And there he is. Ready to answer your questions. I did speak to him about changing the security on that specific photo and he is trying to find out how to do it. That is now for those that want to see it without wanting to have a discussion with him. Not worth much though just to look at the photo.
 
No, you are simply a man. You are not capable of being anyone's mother. And why ask anyway? You run away from direct questions.

And what did Zola say? And all those with the "thumbs up"? And the rest of Nkqubela? And the "white Africans" in Robertson?
 
Last edited:
Damn. It's a good thing I don't go around calling myself by the nick-names my friends and lovers gave me when they were drunk. I can only imagine the hilarity if I went to a random forum and tried to convince people to call me, "Condom Man," "Epic sober driver of *hic*," or "Sex God in high-tops." (That last one was from my college days. Long story.)

Do those "friends" perhaps have names and contact details or are they ghosts as well?
 
How many different ways, and how many different people need to tell you that your link doesn't work?????? If we click on it, it says it is either unavailable or we are not in the right group to view it. You sure are thick and slow for deity.

Well I have some ideas. Those that do not see it does not have permission because you do not want to be linked. So what is the reason?

But I did speak to my son also and asked him to change his security on that as that will open it up for public view for those wanting to stay "ghosts".

And to a more valid point, some random facebook post isn't proof of anything. You are just some nutter in the internet forum universe. You can post any link you like and say it is you. That is not proof of anything as you can say anything you like and claim to be anyone you want. It's the beauty of internet forums.

Well it is only your opinion. You have not gone really into it which you should have.

Let me show you.

I went to "Cleopatra". Spoke there about you. Post links to you here on IS etc. So we will see the results. And then we will see if this "theory" of yours are really the truth or just some "fiction" you thought off.

And then we can conclude on your "same level" of proof. So I think you are a bit early in your judgment.

But seeing that you are now on FB. Take my example. Go there to my page and the page of my wife and the page of my son and start speaking. Ask questions etc. and come back with some facts against me if there are.
"
You see I am reality and what I speak about is reality. Unlike you and "Cleopatra". I am sure "Cleopatra" will go down in history as a fake. But many would have learned from "Cleopatra" about the "same level of proof" and the difference.
 
Last edited:
I get that you're into gender-swapping and age-play, but this isn't a kink forum. You'd have much better luck finding play partners for that sort of thing on Grinder or Fetlife. It's NOT cool to try and forcibly involve people in your kink scenes without their consent.

The gender swapped incest role-play you're trying to initiate here is being done on the wrong web site. There are plenty of places online for you to find incest role-play and age-play partners. Not my thing, not going to judge you for it being your thing as long as you keep it to fantasy between consenting adults, but trying to push that scene on a skeptics' forum is NOT COOL.

Safe, Sane, Consensual.

You're completely failing on that last one.

Oops! You totally missed me. You will need to read some more in this thread. Do not be lazy. Do your homework. Sloppiness is a bad spirit.
 
Wow.

You claim to be a deity, yet you don't know the difference between a Protestant and a Catholic, despite supposedly having been a protestant pastor at one point.

I think I'm beginning to see how you lost that job.

Did you try to involve your congregants in your incest role play scene without their consent as well?

I did mention it in another reply. You are totally on the wrong track. You need to read some more in this thread or rather ask before you make wrong judgments like this.
 
After about 20 years in IT, I can attest that there are people who simply cannot comprehend that some things work for one login and not another. The fact that an image on a web site can be restricted to certain logins is simply beyond the technical acumen of some people.

You'd think a self-proclaimed deity could understand this concept.

The way you said it is totally understood. Thanks. So you need to fix your login. You can become my "friend" just for the sake of asking questions. No problem.

You can even call yourself "Cleopatra2". But I would advice to do it honestly.

Dishonesty like "Cleopatra" will reap "dishonest" results. That we will see in future.
 
Last edited:
I did speak to him about changing the security on that specific photo and he is trying to find out how to do it. That is now for those that want to see it without wanting to have a discussion with him. Not worth much though just to look at the photo.

I don't believe you.

Even if you WERE telling the truth and he DID call you "mother" it doesn't prove anything. Any "god" who takes this much effort to produce such pathetic "evidence" is not a god at all.

Do those "friends" perhaps have names and contact details or are they ghosts as well?

Nah. Nick-names given by drunk friends are proof of nothing, as your "mother" claim bears out. Even if you DID prove some drunk guy called you "mother" all it shows is a drunk guy said something stupid. Wow. Stop the presses. Call the Pope.

So what is the comparison?

Your claims are ********.

You should go into the arguments. Meaning you will have to ask my "one follower" and those with the "thumbs" up.

I did. I asked the person whose Facebook page you keep spamming. So far, he has not answered. You can't be much of a God-Mother to him if he can't be bothered to respond to someone asking about you.

I already gave you the full picture but you do not believe me so it is up to you to proof me wrong.

Nah, not worth the effort. Your one alleged follower can't be bothered to respond to a question about you. I have information from third parties I trust FAR more than you who HAVE done that research. I know not to trust you, which is the key lesson to take away.

Not difficult at all. I will just ask for the evidence. So give me some names. People I can contact.

Oh, drop the hypocrisy. You're asking us to believe you're a god-mother without providing any actual witnesses or believers.

Specially there in your area where you are living. Maybe a wife, child or other relative? Or some friends you are working with. Specially people that would not mind coming here and tell us more about your claims.

Whoa, Whoa, Whoa. How the HELL do you get to asking a "child or other relative," as potential witnesses to someone being a sex god? Did you just confess to incest and pedophilia? Jesus Christ man, you get creepier and more disturbing the longer this thread goes on.
 
Ooo. Censorship now, is it?

Actually the better way is just to admit your mistake and then forget about it seeing that you have admitted and are on your way to a better life.

Unfortunately he is hindered by his pride and can not walk the correct way. Now he is fumbling in his corner. Showing his corner every now and then. His punishment for enjoying his pride.
 
The way you said it is totally understood. Thanks. So you need to fix your login. You can become my "friend" just for the sake of asking questions. No problem. You can even call yourself "Cleopatra2".

Wow. You understand the issue enough to allegedly talk to your alleged friend about changing the permissions on the alleged photo, yet still mange to type out the bold phrase above in response to me calling you out on this very topic.

Wow.

I'd like to recommend a few books for you:

Facebook For Dummies

Computer Basics Absolute Beginner's Guide, Windows 10 Edition (includes Content Update Program) (8th Edition)

"Is This Thing On?": A Friendly Guide to Everything Digital for Newbies, Technophobes, and the Kicking & Screaming
 
Yeah. All of the websites that I build and operate have "permissions" built right in to the system. "you have permission to do this, but you don't have permission to do that." And it is all strictly controlled. How anyone could be unaware of this is most odd given they claim to be a deity, and further given that the same dead link keeps on being posted by the aforementioned "mother-goddess" despite being told over and over that the link is busted.

Yep. The human way to do it. "All strictly controlled" by the humans. God does not need that. He has Wisdom.

Perhaps this is why god has no website? Maybe god is simply too dumb to figure out the internet.

Nope. This god has a website and a forum.

http://johanabrahams.pnyhost.com

http://forums.delphiforums.com/king

Haha. God.com is a registered domain, but has no website. How amusing.

Answered already.
 
Yep. He's demanding censorship which he cannot enforce.

If he WERE a deity he could do things like bind up fingers and tongue of his critics from a distance, give them leprosy, or smite them in one of a number of ways. Being just a man with no powers beyond plying people with alcohol until they say embarrassing and irrational things, all he can really do is bluster.

Only your opinion. But thanks for giving it.
 
Ewww. Just ewww.

Creeper alert!

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/uIzTq4kb.png[/qimg]

Dude, stop trying to bring your age play kink into this thread. trying to force people to participate in your age play scene is sexual harassment at best.

[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/ukSmd2Dl.jpg[/qimg]
[qimg]https://i.imgur.com/wuIgnxP.jpg[/qimg]

Yep. I see you like cartoons. What else do you like?
 
Do you know Paul Bethke?

Not from South Africa. But I did hear his name a view times over here. Seems he is writing in this forum.

The relevant posts are kinda vague, but it looks like you were a pastor around the same time he was going around to different churches trying to indoctrinate people into his version of Christianity. You're on the edge of the geographic area he supposedly traveled and his theology necessitates he'd likely have avoided any black-majority churches like leper colonies, but it's conceivable he visited your church and tried to teach you his theology.

Nope can not remember having met or heard about him at that time.



Did Paul Bethke try to convert you?

Nope. Not what I know of.

If so, how did the conversation go?

Nope.
 

Back
Top Bottom