How about the ones you mentioned in post #6?
How did you know about these cases of you hadn't actually found any?
I've looked at some cases it's just that I haven't posted one in this thread.
How about the ones you mentioned in post #6?
How did you know about these cases of you hadn't actually found any?
My definition of reincarnation is the standard definition.
Give me your definition of reincarnation.
What do you mean by "standard" definition? This is your claim we're examining here.
The definition you find in the dictionary.
Well, I'm not necessarily trying to prove that souls transfer from body to body. I'm trying to show that someone's memories are actually the memories of another person. If you proved that the memories of one person are the memories of another then you could prove that that's the case, you could do that without talking about a soul.
I've looked at some cases it's just that I haven't posted one in this thread.
I've looked at some cases it's just that I haven't posted one in this thread.
It's very easy to unquestioning accept something and incorporate it into your belief system without first examining it properly to ensure it deserves to be so incorporated. But it's never too late to examine a belief to check there is sufficient evidence for it, and to readjust your beliefs if it doesn't stand up. It's also sometimes necessary to re-examine beliefs that appeared fully justified, but for which new contradictory evidence has now emerged.I don't know how I became convinced that reincarnation is real, but once you're convinced, and I do not believe you control being convinced, it is a matter of doubting what you believe.
I tried and can not think of what would falsify reincarnation, for me the "evidence" would have to be explained away, so far I have found none of the things meant to explain it away convincing.
I tried and can not think of what would falsify reincarnation, for me the "evidence" would have to be explained away, so far I have found none of the things meant to explain it away convincing.
If by testable claims you mean cases of reincarnation, I'll try to get to that soon.
Like you wanted to do in this thread on reincarnation, which you abandoned when people started asking you to support your case?I had an idea of what I wanted this thread to be, I would post those various points above and someone would point out the problems with it and it would continue from there. Here's an example of what I mean with the first point;
<Examples snipped>
And so on.
I tried and can not think of what would falsify reincarnation, for me the "evidence" would have to be explained away, so far I have found none of the things meant to explain it away convincing.
Other poster: please demonstrate at least one reliable case of a child who remembers a past life.Me: In cases of children who remember past lives where people claim the parents lie about it while getting their children to play along; Some people don't go public about their child's comments that indicate a probable past life and instead just tell friends and family members, which, I believe, removes the incentive for monetary gain and therefore of a reason to lie.
Why would the address and the names of his kids not be valid?
He did say what his past self's favorite soda was, a soda that was discontinued 50 years before his supposed new incarnation. And there have been cases where intimate details have been reported.
It seems unlikely that each case has some unique thing to explain it away, why would it happen so much if that's the case? Maybe if there was some weird psychological phenomenon that was discovered besides cryptomnesia, but I can't think of what that would be.
What would make you think that past lives are real?
If they did, one can only hope that the adults around them would interpret them correctly!
I was not saying that the soul is not reincarnated but that I do not have an argument for the soul.
I believe it is easier to make an argument for the persistence of memories than the mechanism by which the awareness that those memories are housed in transfers from body to body and how could we observe observe a soul leaving, existing apart from and then going to another body? There doesn't seem to be any obvious way.
Only if (a) there was such a thing as reincarnation, and (b) if the adults chose to interpret what the child said as evidence of reincarnation; both of which would fail to stand up to scrutiny.Then wouldn't more children report past lives, if they all experienced adults talking and absorbed and rearranged the information?
That is correct, and Wonder234 has wisely chosen to limit his claim to the transfer of memories, presumably from dead people to living people.As was pointed out the last time this topic came up, why would memories of a past life necessarily imply reincarnation? Why not time travel, being able to speak with the dead, or even necromancy? The last would be the most fun, I would think.
There are cases where a child remembers being someone so obscure that there is practically no way to come across information about them other than deliberately searching for it.