• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

General Holocaust denial discussion Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
......

Caption? "Last Moments before the gas chamber"

That's the sum total of the photographic evidence for the killing of six million, or four million per the sign at the Auschwitz gate! How freaking absurd can it get ???????????????

Lie, that is not the only photographic evidence. Stop lying and start answering my questions about where all the alleged survivors went.
 
Lie, that is not the only photographic evidence. Stop lying and start answering my questions about where all the alleged survivors went.

Ah but Saggy probably dismisses the Sonderkammando photographs as fakes, or the Allied air photographs of smoke pouring from the cremation pits.

Ignorance is bliss for some, Nessie.
 
I suspect he is just going on posting to troll us and he enjoys the attention. he has also ignored PMs requesting he answer my questions. That he refuses proves he cannot evidence his own beliefs. That means his is a religion and a deep seated religious belief is not interested in evidence.
 
I suspect he is just going on posting to troll us and he enjoys the attention. he has also ignored PMs requesting he answer my questions. That he refuses proves he cannot evidence his own beliefs. That means his is a religion and a deep seated religious belief is not interested in evidence.

He's just ranting to himself at this point.
 
Mark Weber is always a reliable source:

Bergen-Belsen Camp: The suppressed story

In striking contrast to the widely-accepted image of Belsen, which is essentially a product of hateful wartime propaganda, is the suppressed, albeit grim, historical reality. In truth, the Bergen-Belsen story may be regarded as the Holocaust story in miniature.

LOL

BTW, I love whale. It's probably my favorite denier site.

So, let's see. Weber correctly points out that Bergen-Belsen was not an extermination camp. That's nice. What he doesn't point out is that Germans continued to stuff inmates into the camp instead of leaving them where they were or turning them over to the Red Cross. In case you didn't know, Saggy, if you leave people in overcrowded areas without access to clean water, food and medication they will spread disease, get sick and die.
 
LOL

BTW, I love whale. It's probably my favorite denier site.

So, let's see. Weber correctly points out that Bergen-Belsen was not an extermination camp. That's nice. What he doesn't point out is that Germans continued to stuff inmates into the camp instead of leaving them where they were or turning them over to the Red Cross. In case you didn't know, Saggy, if you leave people in overcrowded areas without access to clean water, food and medication they will spread disease, get sick and die.

That's exactly the point I was trying to make a page ago.

If I was to kidnap someone and keep them in my basement during a severe snow storm, and keep all my food supplies and heat sources to myself, and they died... I would be responsible for their death. It doesn't matter if I couldn't get supplies in because of the difficulties, their death would be on my hands.

Same thing for the camps in the last months of the war.
 
Last edited:
That's exactly the point I was trying to make a page ago.

If I was to kidnap someone and keep them in my basement during a severe snow storm, and keep all my food supplies and heat sources to myself, and they died... I would be responsible for their death. It doesn't matter if I couldn't supplies in because of the difficulties, their death would be on my hands.

Same thing for the camps in the last months of the war.

For some reason we have to keep repeating the same thing over to Saggy.

Well, not for some reason....:D

Saggy's method of denial is to keep repeating himself and hope no one catches him on it.
 
That's exactly the point I was trying to make a page ago.

If I was to kidnap someone and keep them in my basement during a severe snow storm, and keep all my food supplies and heat sources to myself, and they died... I would be responsible for their death. It doesn't matter if I couldn't supplies in because of the difficulties, their death would be on my hands.

Same thing for the camps in the last months of the war.

Especially when a well stocked food supply was found in the German army depot nearby to the Bergen-Belsen camp. Denialist claims Allied bombing cut off the camp from all supplies is a lie.
 
Why in hell would a nation desparately in need of laborers in its crucial war industries work them to death?

Maybe because the racist gospel of the leaders of this nation has obliterated their common sense and that they are so convinced that they must kill the Jews that nothing can stop them from doing so.

This is well documented too. Some local nazi leaders in occupied Poland asked to be allowed to keep "their" Jews to work for local industry, but the answers of higher level of command within Himmler's organisation were usually negative. All what happened is that the concerned Jews were transported to the death camps of Aktion Reinhard a little bit later...
 
The Auschwitz Album

"The Auschwitz Album is the only surviving visual evidence of the process leading to the mass murder at Auschwitz-Birkenau."
Unfortunately for you, that's not what you claimed. You wrote, "Yad Vashem has a section devoted to the only photographic evidence of the holohoax at Auschwitz."

What the blurb you are now quoting says is that Lili Jacob album is the only surviving visual evidence of the process leading to extermination - emphasis on the overall process and leading up to the murder itself (but not showing the murder). Put another way, the album contains photographs from the various stages of the processing of a single transport, or as Gideon Greif's essay from the Auschwitz Museum publication of the album says, the album "documents in about 200 photos . . . the arrival, selection, confiscation of property, and preparation for the physical liquidation of a Jewish 'transport' to Auschwitz-Birkenau. . . . the album [ ] document the dispatch of a Jewish transport of deportees in the spring of 1944 . . ."

You should know this because the Yad Vashem article says so: "The photos in the album show the entire process except for the killing itself."

You didn't write anything even close to this; simply put, what you wrote is wrong. There is other "photographic evidence" (what you wrote) of aspects of the extermination at Auschwitz, notably the Sonderkommando photos showing outdoor cremation and women being rushed to the gas chambers, and aerial reconnaissance photos of the Birkenau camp.

Btw it was a photo from the Lili Jacob album that was instrumental in convincing Eric Hunt that Jews were gassed at Birkenau.
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately for you, that's not what you claimed. You wrote, " Yad Vashem has a section devoted to the only photographic evidence of the holohoax at Auschwitz."

What the blurb you are now quoting says is that Lili Jacob album is the only surviving visual evidence of the process leading to extermination - emphasis on the overall process and leading up to the murder itself (but not showing the murder). Put another way, the album contains photographs from the various stages of the processing of a single transport, or as Gideon Greif's essay from the Auschwitz Museum publication of the album puts it, the album "documents in about 200 photos . . . the arrival, selection, confiscation of property, and preparation for the physical liquidation of a Jewish 'transport' to Auschwitz-Birkenau. . . . the album [ ] document the dispatch of a Jewish transport of deportees in the spring of 1944 . . ."

You should know this because the Yad Vashem article says so: "The photos in the album show the entire process except for the killing itself."

You didn't write anything even close to this; simply put, what you wrote is wrong.

Btw it was a photo from this album that was instrumental in convincing Eric Hunt that Jews were gassed at Birkenau.


What complete idiocy. Rationality takes a holiday at ISF, every day.

Here is one to ponder, 1+1 = 2. Now, tell me, why is that false?
 
What complete idiocy. Rationality takes a holiday at ISF, every day.

Here is one to ponder, 1+1 = 2. Now, tell me, why is that false?
So . . . you insist that the famous Auschwitz Sonderkommando and aerial photos don't exist? Or what exactly are you trying to tell us?

Saggy, I realize that, as Argumemnon said, you have trouble with distinctions, details, and differences. I am not sure whether you can't follow these things or simply have an axe to grind. Also with basic information.

But that's no reason to let frustration get the better of you. Your vehement dismissals and name-calling are no substitute for explanations, evidence, and discussion.
 
Last edited:
So . . . you insist that the famous Auschwitz Sonderkommando and aerial photos don't exist?

Had to google them ... yes I've seen this photo berfore and a few others like it ..

pnAFo7p.jpg


This photo purports to show bodies being cremated in open air pits. They don't purport to show anyone being killed. It is well documented that there was a typhus epidemic in Auschwitz in 1942, i.e. no one disputes that prisoners died in large numbers at Auschwitz.

However, the photo is suspect. In order to cremate a body it must be exposed to intense heat for a long period of time, and it requires a pyre or grate so that the fire can burn beneath the body, whereas this photo seems to show bodies being cremated in a pit, which is a physical impossibility. So, I don't know what to make of it.
 
That's the most pathetic counter-argument I've seen in possibly over a year.

There is no point in 'countering' complete idiocy. It's just a game with the hasbara ... as every post from the hoaxers demonstrates.
 
There is no point in 'countering' complete idiocy. It's just a game with the hasbara ... as every post from the hoaxers demonstrates.

But you're refusing to look at ANY evidence. You're defining every piece of evidence as unworthy of being looked at before even looking at it. That's circular reasoning. Your behaviour is irrational and unreasonable.

The people who disagree with you aren't part of some giant conspiracy. It might be really exciting to you but it's no excuse to pretend that it has anything to do with reality.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom