• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Ed Dueling protests spark state of emergency in Virginia.

Hmm- even James Murdoch is very unhappy with Trump's reaction to the Charlottesville Nazi rally:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/17/...-donation-anti-defamation-league.html?mcubz=0

Reading this thread has been seriously depressing to me, but it is so reassuring and thrilling for me to see that so many people in the real world, especially people with political views different from mine, agree that Nazis are not okay! Really-if we couldn't come together on the idea that Nazis were bad what hope was there for this country?
 
Giordano said:
In Germany in the 1920s and 30's there were Nazis, Nazi sympathizers, Nazi enablers. And Nazi dupes. Important to remember that they all contributed to the events that led to many millions of people dead.
Click to expand...
In the 1920's and 30's most Germans paid little attention to the Nazis (who could hardly be taken seriously, let's face it) and took positions between Conservative and Social Democrat. I suppose one could call them "enablers", but one has to have some sympathy for them. Their world was very new to them, and they had no idea how fragile it was.

Judge not, that ye be not judged. :cool:
 
johnny karate said:
It was a rally sponsored by white nationalists. It was white nationalists who acquired the permit for the rally. In short, it was a white nationalist rally.

So exactly who are these other people who just happened to be innocently part of that same rally? Who are these "very fine people" who stood shoulder-to-shoulder with people waving Nazi flags and chanting anti-Semitic slogans?
Click to expand...

The nature of these things is some highly organized people went about getting a permit and the insurance rider and everything else and about 90% of the people who show up seem to think these things happen because an event got shared on facebook. Or rather 300 events by a whole range of interested parties many of whom didn't do any homework and the attendees even less.

Go to a demonstration over 100 people. You'll run into dozens of people there quite excited to discuss with you their particular Theory of Everything. You will spend maybe 20% of the time discussing the actual issue that was the purported purpose, assuming you weren't drawn there under the pretense of a different reason to begin with.

Now, after the scene got contentious and violent? I'd be willing to be the crowd thinned dramatically before or during that phase. Among those who left at that point, I could see it being the case that they've got some troublesome thought patterns going on, but could ultimately be harmless.

Beyond that, we still have a problem of celebrating a group of people being attacked for crimes they 'will almost certainly commit' in the streets.

How do we designate who is and is not to be allowed to be a Nazi hunter? Because what if Nazis infiltrate the Nazi hunters and accuse key community figures of being Nazis?
 
The Big Dog said:
Say, Nazis are bad!

Lest dismantle freedom of speech.
Click to expand...

You appear to have missed my point so I will explain it: Trump's response to the Nazi rally is viewed as embarrassingly inadequate or worse by an amazingly wide spectrum of people of different positions and political views.I am very heartened by that given that feeling has not been universal in this Forum. I understand why you are so eager to return to the distracting argument that Anti-fa is anti freedom of speech: defending Trump's response is clearly much more difficult.

I've discussed Anti-fa before. But my post to which you responded was only about the widespread revulsion in response to the white supremacists and the rejection of Trump's questionable sympathies and lack of statesmanship.
 
CapelDodger said:
In the 1920's and 30's most Germans paid little attention to the Nazis (who could hardly be taken seriously, let's face it) and took positions between Conservative and Social Democrat. I suppose one could call them "enablers", but one has to have some sympathy for them. Their world was very new to them, and they had no idea how fragile it was.

Judge not, that ye be not judged. :cool:
Click to expand...

I was not judging them so much as warning those in this forum who believe that the USA Nazis are not a threat. The same was believed by many Germans. History sadly proved to them that they were incorrect in their confidence.
 
Giordano said:
Hmm- even James Murdoch is very unhappy with Trump's reaction to the Charlottesville Nazi rally:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/17/...-donation-anti-defamation-league.html?mcubz=0

Reading this thread has been seriously depressing to me, but it is so reassuring and thrilling for me to see that so many people in the real world, especially people with political views different from mine, agree that Nazis are not okay! Really-if we couldn't come together on the idea that Nazis were bad what hope was there for this country?
Click to expand...
The coming together around Trump's response is predicated on the common belief that Nazism is a bad thing. Worse than Communism even, and that was seriously bad.

Trump not really getting this at all is what's earning him pariah status.
 
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/09/the-rise-of-the-violent-left/534192/

The Rise of the Violent Left
Antifa’s activists say they’re battling burgeoning authoritarianism on the American right. Are they fueling it instead?

For progressives, Donald Trump is not just another Republican president. Seventy-six percent of Democrats, according to a Suffolk poll from last September, consider him a racist. Last March, according to a YouGov survey, 71 percent of Democrats agreed that his campaign contained “fascist undertones.” All of which raises a question that is likely to bedevil progressives for years to come: If you believe the president of the United States is leading a racist, fascist movement that threatens the rights, if not the lives, of vulnerable minorities, how far are you willing to go to stop it?

In Washington, D.C., the response to that question centers on how members of Congress can oppose Trump’s agenda, on how Democrats can retake the House of Representatives, and on how and when to push for impeachment. But in the country at large, some militant leftists are offering a very different answer. On Inauguration Day, a masked activist punched the white-supremacist leader Richard Spencer. In February, protesters violently disrupted UC Berkeley’s plans to host a speech by Milo Yiannopoulos, a former Breitbart.com editor. In March, protesters pushed and shoved the controversial conservative political scientist Charles Murray when he spoke at Middlebury College, in Vermont.

As far-flung as these incidents were, they have something crucial in common. Like the organizations that opposed the Multnomah County Republican Party’s participation in the 82nd Avenue of Roses Parade, these activists appear to be linked to a movement called “antifa,” which is short for antifascist or Anti-Fascist Action. The movement’s secrecy makes definitively cataloging its activities difficult, but this much is certain: Antifa’s power is growing. And how the rest of the activist left responds will help define its moral character in the Trump age.
Click to expand...

The violence is not directed only at avowed racists like Spencer: In June of last year, demonstrators—at least some of whom were associated with antifa—punched and threw eggs at people exiting a Trump rally in San Jose, California. An article in It’s Going Down celebrated the “righteous beatings.”
Click to expand...
 
Emily's Cat said:
NOT EVERY PERSON AT THAT RALLY WAS A NAZI
Click to expand...

I'd like more than that statement as proof of that statement.

If you were innocently a fan of preserving statues, who happened to turn up to the march and didn't notice that it was dominated by Nazis, then you would have had to have been very stupid.

An implausibly useful idiot.
 
sir drinks-a-lot said:
Did you see the video of the rally leader crying? That was bizarre.
Click to expand...

Check out the long Vice piece linked above. You see him all ballsy in a safe hotel room in a different state 36 hours later bragging about how it was a victory for his nutso-assed side. Surrounded by his guns, he's a poster boy for "Happiness is a Warm Gun".
 
Tina Fey on a summer edition of SNL summarized it very well: "I saw Raiders of the Lost Ark and I wasn't confused."

What would Trump take from the movie? "There was violence on every side. Every side. And fine people on each side. And the Nazis had beautiful uniforms. Beautiful. Awful to see them damaged at the end of the movie."
 
Last edited:
Giordano said:
Tina Fey on a summer edition of SNL summarized it very well: "I saw Raiders of the Lost Ark and I wasn't confused."

What would Trump take from the movie? "There was violence on every side. Every side. And fine people on each side. And the Nazis had beautiful uniforms. Beautiful. Awful to see them damaged at the end of the movie."
Click to expand...

That was SNL Weekend Update. Fey was fantastic.
 
From Badscience,

I think the extent to which most of these statues are not truly memorials can be shown by the fact that James Longstreet seems very underrepresented compared to other Confederates of similar rank, and especially compared to Nathan Bedford Forest.
Click to expand...
 
Giordano said:
Hmm- even James Murdoch is very unhappy with Trump's reaction to the Charlottesville Nazi rally:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/17/...-donation-anti-defamation-league.html?mcubz=0

Reading this thread has been seriously depressing to me, but it is so reassuring and thrilling for me to see that so many people in the real world, especially people with political views different from mine, agree that Nazis are not okay! Really-if we couldn't come together on the idea that Nazis were bad what hope was there for this country?
Click to expand...

Yeah, condemning and opposing Nazis didn't used to be a partisan affair. For the most part, it still isn't. It is nice to see so many from all over the political spectrum to for a bit, put aside their differences and say that the Nazis are all bad people and that Trump's downplaying that is abhorrent. What is not so nice are that people are still trying to defend him and them.

Are all the criticisms of Trump over this fair and reasonable? No, but lumping in the most outrageous attacks on him over this as being what 'the left is talking about' is no more valid than lumping in everyone defending Trump with the actual Nazis (although 'useful idiots and inadvertent or intentional enablers is much more fair). There were no good people on the Nazis side of the rally. Maybe some otherwise good people, but so the hell what? Still Nazi supporters at best. That some see this only as another bludgeon to attack 'liberals' is outright dumb. It isn't a 'liberal' thing.

Limiting the counterpoints to the specific invalid or unfair arguments would be much better and of course have the advantage of not providing cover for literal Nazis. One would hope that everyone here would take pains to do that, but sadly for man, attacking liberals is more important than not helping literal Nazis.
 
A little historical reminder: do you think most/all people at the first Hitler rallies were Nazis?
No, but they were ok enough with their ideology to march alongside them.

Same thing with everyone at the Unite the Right rally.
 
The Great Zaganza said:
A little historical reminder: do you think most/all people at the first Hitler rallies were Nazis?
No, but they were ok enough with their ideology to march alongside them.

Same thing with everyone at the Unite the Right rally.
Click to expand...

And without the benefit of history, they might have have had more excuse than someone now marching alongside Nazis.
 
"'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

picture.php


Both sides isn't new.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom