I don't think that anyone ever asked anyone to "prove" that UFOs in 1912 weren't stealth aircraft. No kidding. The "U" means "unidentified."
When you have triangular flying vehicles hovering and maneuvering around the skies during the late 1800's and early 1900's, then stealth aircraft can definitely be ruled out. I like the old UFO case files because they cannot be explained away as high performance aircraft. Another old case was the Fatima UFO of 1917, which was photographed as tens of thousands of people watched as the object dance across the sky.
I think that you missed my point about billions of people having video cameras in their pockets? 30 year old videos of 50 year old technology wasn't what I had in mind. The amount of video recording in the world is literally millions of times greater than it has been during the UFO era. The quantity and quality is growing exponentially every single year. And you show us these silly stories. Why is nothing new compelling? I think that I know the answer.
I have posted the old stories to make a point that the objects are not high performance aircraft much less celestial bodies. Remember, all it takes is just ONE authentic UFO confirmation and its game over. However, that conclusion has been made thousands of times from government sources and for me, that question has been answered as the object passed over my base in 1968, which was to say the least, an "eye-opener." Then, to be sent to another base that has been investigating UFOs that have interfered with our Minuteman missiles. Only years later, did I find out that the Air Force had confirmed the existence of ET during the 1940's and early 1950's. Were you aware of the Air Force's own admission that the UFOs were
"Interplanetary spaceships?" You should have heard what the Air Force was teaching its cadets at the Air Force Academy about UFOs.
How many airliners did you notice flying at high altitude overhead today? Now, how many people noticed UFOs flying across the sky at 190,000 feet and above? NORAD knows but such information is soon tagged
"CLASSIFIED."
Skeptics think that UFOs are silly but how silly is it for skeptics to say that a UFO which flew in formation with an aircraft and tracked on ground-based radar and observed by eyewitnesses on the ground before zooming off at 4000 mph in a climb was Venus? Does the Bariloche UFO incident ring a bell?
How about the UFO that tracked Ronald Reagan's airccraft before the UFO zoomed off in a climb at high speed over California? Could that UFO incident involving his aircraft be the basis for Reagan's so-called ET speech at the UN?
