Cont: All things Trump + Russia Part 2

[acbytesla]

It's not about her credibility? It's about what she posted! How do you not get that???

What I have seen are links after links that don't support her argument.

 

[logger]

Perhaps you selectively ignored the uncomfortable parts, then:

So you want me to admit to Trump jars guilt on so called Russian information that isn't even offered? Not to mention she actually had no Russian information?

You cannot be serious!

"Hello, we were contacted, alledgedly by Russian agents who wanted to communicate possibly illegal information in order to influence the elections. Here are their names and e-mail addresses."

Since this was most assuredly shady, the best thing to do was contact the authorities, not check out the info.

Getting dirt on your opponent is shady, got it. I wonder if the FBI would have screamed at them to not call them until they had something serious! Have you critically thought about that?

What? Are you even trying anymore?

Because it's fun reading your responses.

 

[Elagabalus]

Yes I read them, I didn't see any information from the Russian government.




The FBI? What was he going to tell them. He met with a Russian lawyer given status by the Obama administration who says she has dirt on Clinton but actually did not?



Well, that gives you a chance to enlighten us?

What am I? Chopped liver?

Yes, the Dems decided on blackmail, and then didn't act on any of the information provided to allow Trump to win the election, so they could float this Nothing Burger a year later.


I'll admit it has a certain all encompassing CT charm to it. But Frankly, we're just not that good.

 

[logger]

What I have seen are links after links that don't support her argument.

That has nothing to do with her credibility, you might want to re-read the MA

 

[acbytesla]

He and others are quite invested in this.

Hmmmm, you think? You think I don't want a treasonous traitor as President?

Yeah, you're right.

 

[logger]

What am I? Chopped liver?

I would never accuse you of that, I don't even like liver.

I also have no idea what you're saying.

 

[acbytesla]

That has nothing to do with her credibility, you might want to re-read the MA

Suggesting that her links don't say what she says they do is not a violation of the MA.

 

[logger]

Hmmmm, you think? You think I don't want a treasonous traitor as President?

Yeah, you're right.

Lol, so it's desperation that leads you to believe anything, got it.

 

[skyeagle409]

H Trump jr could have turned it over to the FBI in time for Comey to say "sigh" "no credible prosecutor would want to pursue this"

But, Trump Jr. didn't contact the FBI as he should have done and instead, he sought to collude with the Russians, which he did. IMO, Trump Jr. received information from the Russians in order to aid Trump Sr. in the election, which is illegal and Trump Sr. was aware of Trump Jr.'s Russian meeting. Perhaps, multiple investigations will reveal what we don't know today. After all, not a week goes back when more negative information is revealed against Trump and his administration and family. They are all a bunch of liars who are unfit and incompetent.

When I was invited by the Russians to tour their warship, I knew what to do and reported my contact to the Air Force OSI where I underwent a 30 minute debrief session. However, Trump Jr. sought to cover-up his Russian contacts by lying on multiple occasions in order to cover-up his Russian contacts.

 

[Childlike Empress]

Suggesting that her links don't say what she says they do is not a violation of the MA.

Maybe. It's another lie, though, based on nothing that is even remotely in context to the posts before. My twitter link shows exactly what I described about it. Makes two in a couple of minutes. Doesn't look good for someone who wants to convince the audience that he is on some just fight against a liar.

 

[Belz...]

Dense? She linked a twitter account that showed an RT advertisement. Are you not understanding that?

Of course I am. That's the point of my comment: CE's post always somehow source back to Russian stuff, RT or otherwise.

 

[Belz...]

So you want me to admit to Trump jars guilt on so called Russian information that isn't even offered?

I quoted the e-mail to you. That's an offer.

Not to mention she actually had no Russian information?

This is such an oft-repeated defense that it shows how desperate your side has become. Everyone familiar with the law knows that it doesn't matter if there was actual information to be had: they went into the meeting expecting to get it, rather than call the authorities. That's a crime.

Getting dirt on your opponent is shady, got it.

Do you not understand the fact that it's quite different when a foreign government does this?

Because it's fun reading your responses.

It's fun reading facts? Yes, I suppose it is. It's not quite as fun reading your lies.

 

[Elagabalus]

I would never accuse you of that, I don't even like liver.

I also have no idea what you're saying.

You floated this scenario earlier:

Hannity Blames Obama And Blackmail For Trump Jr's Meeting With The Russians

So which is it, the Russian attorney only wanted to talk about adoptions, or she was a Kremlin operative that Obama let in the country?

Hannity and Sekulow would have it both ways.

It's quite possible it could be both ways? You can't really see that can you?

and it appears you are still trying to sell it. I pointed out that your scenario doesn't make sense.

 

[acbytesla]

Lol, so it's desperation that leads you to believe anything, got it.

That's funny. As if Republican congressmen weren't saying the same thing a couple of months ago and then said it was only a joke.

In the meantime. Trump meets with the Russians in the Oval Office boasting how he got rid of that pesky FBI Director Comey and then leaked classified intel from Israel. He pushed to give back confiscated Russian compound and continues to treat the Russians like they are our best friends while at the same time pissing on Germany and the UK

 

[logger]

Of course I am. That's the point of my comment: CE's post always somehow source back to Russian stuff, RT or otherwise.

Try and focus on what a person is communicating, that's really all that matters.

 

[Childlike Empress]

Of course I am. That's the point of my comment: CE's post always somehow source back to Russian stuff, RT or otherwise.

Dude, look at the thread title. All things Trump + Russia. What the other side says is relevant (as a general rule, if you aren't a fanatic), for example that they now openly mock that Russiagate nonsense in advertisements at the international section of the Moscow airport is newsworthy. And the way that information was delivered to us over twitter is nothing short of hilarious.

I understand very well that you would prefer to keep the "discussion" confined to your little echo chamber where only the "Western" pre$$titute media sets the propaganda agenda - which is what all the "fake news" crap is about, remember, started by Washington Pest -, but I'm afraid it won't happen.

 

[acbytesla]

Maybe. It's another lie, though, based on nothing that is even remotely in context to the posts before. My twitter link shows exactly what I described about it. Makes two in a couple of minutes. Doesn't look good for someone who wants to convince the audience that he is on some just fight against a liar.

You see logger. She's calling me a liar and that isn't breaking the MA.

But no CE, I stand by my statement. The Intel departments have said that the Russians performed operations designed to interfere in the Presidential election. Note that the new FBI Director nominee during his confirmation hearing also said that this is not in question.

 

[logger]

I quoted the e-mail to you. That's an offer.



This is such an oft-repeated defense that it shows how desperate your side has become. Everyone familiar with the law knows that it doesn't matter if there was actual information to be had: they went into the meeting expecting to get it, rather than call the authorities. That's a crime.

How exactly was it a crime? Should be easy for you to lay it out.

Do you not understand the fact that it's quite different when a foreign government does this?

It's much more involved than your conclusions are jumping to. Wishful thinking is all you have.

It's fun reading facts? Yes, I suppose it is. It's not quite as fun reading your lies.

Lol
You don't even know the facts, that is the fun part.

 

[Elagabalus]

How exactly was it a crime? Should be easy for you to lay it out.




It's much more involved than your conclusions are jumping to. Wishful thinking is all you have.




Lol
You don't even know the facts, that is the fun part.

RTFM Start on page 1 of the All things Trump + Russia Part 1 Thread

 

[logger]

In the meantime. Trump meets with the Russians in the Oval Office boasting how he got rid of that pesky FBI Director Comey and then leaked classified intel from Israel. He pushed to give back confiscated Russian compound and continues to treat the Russians like they are our best friends while at the same time pissing on Germany and the UK

Fake fake and more fake. Funny how the narrative of Trump leaking classified info is amazingly gone!