*If* I were invited, I'd just throw up a middle finger. I find their regime disgusting, and I'll gladly insult them in public.
'kin A!
*If* I were invited, I'd just throw up a middle finger. I find their regime disgusting, and I'll gladly insult them in public.
I'm confused.
Why was this guy in North Korea to begin with? We know that that horrible government, why even try for it?
It's a great bar story.
IIUC he was going to China next, possibly Hong Kong. He was a finance and commerce major, and he might have been thinking of his future professional life. His father made some passing remarks about his reasons, but I don't think he delved into it much (I cannot find a link ATM). BTW I found this Time article helpful in understanding the diplomatic situation.I'm confused.
Why was this guy in North Korea to begin with? We know that that horrible government, why even try for it?
The flip side is if we don't want war, we must ignore or downplay these tragedies?North Korea just murdered an American citizen. President Trump should not -- and will not -- let this stand. We must go to war ASAP.
The flip side is if we don't want war, we must ignore or downplay these tragedies?
Isn't there a lot of room between these extremes? Or is it impossible to criticize a foreign power without pushing for war with them?
We are at war with north korea, we have been for more than 60 years. The armistice is not a peace treaty after all.
With regard to north korea we have no leverage other than war, hell it seems even the Chinese have little or no leverage with them. War is really the only thing that will have any effect.
It seems like, given the state of their economy, that a sack of potatoes and a few bags of rice would have leverage.
Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk
The US could ban travel there. I am not sure whether this would be a good idea or not; international diplomacy is not my forte.I'm pretty sure Cain was referring to the renewal of violence with North Korea, and not the legal technicality.
It seems like, given the state of their economy, that a sack of potatoes and a few bags of rice would have leverage.
Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk
I'm pretty sure Cain was referring to the renewal of violence with North Korea, and not the legal technicality.
No it was for his new youtube channel on extreme vacations, so it is ok to hold him in contempt and laugh at his death.
His decision to go to NK looks foolish in retrospect; however, I have given my reasons upthread for not believing that Mr. Warmbier broke any laws. Eight hundred to a thousand Americans go to North Korea as tourists every year, most of them without incident. On the other hand for every ten people who summit Mount Everest, one person dies.It's not a heinous crime to point out that sometimes, if one does dangerous things, the danger materialises.
His decision to go to NK looks foolish in retrospect; however, I have given my reasons upthread for not believing that Mr. Warmbier broke any laws. Eight hundred to a thousand Americans go to North Korea as tourists every year, most of them without incident. On the other hand for every ten people who summit Mount Everest, one person dies.
Is that an accusation?
It's not a heinous crime to point out that sometimes, if one does dangerous things, the danger materialises.
I don't really think the guy who thought the book would stop the bullet is funny, but his death was entirely his own doing (and his girlfriend) whereas Otto's death was his own stupidity plus the insanity of the North Korean regime. He was a victim.I am comparing the general reactions of this death to the one of the guy trying to use paper to stop a bullet. No one seemed to find laughing over his death to be distasteful, while many in this thread seemed to think that blaming the dead man here was wrong.
I was trying to figure out when it is ok to laugh at someones death.
I am comparing the general reactions of this death to the one of the guy trying to use paper to stop a bullet. No one seemed to find laughing over his death to be distasteful, while many in this thread seemed to think that blaming the dead man here was wrong.
I was trying to figure out when it is ok to laugh at someones death.
What crime do you think he committed, and what is the evidence for this?The fellow in N Korea is less funny because he was less of an idiot - although committing any sort of crime while in a totalitarian state that's so poor and so sanctioned that it has nothing to lose does climb fairly high on the idiot scale. - This one is less funny because of the malicious human actors involved, I think.