• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Leave Nancy Alone!

This is turning into a heartwarmingly bipartisan thread where both sides agree.
 
phiwum said:
With due respect, reception is no better than off topic digressions.
Click to expand...

Pardon me, I meant "repetition".

For the most part, Dumb All Over, you have simply said over and over that Nancy Pelosi in a leadership is good (for Republicans). Yes, we get that. Might be nice if you'd give reasons, but no matter. By the fourteenth repetition, even the slowest among us get that you think Pelosi is good for Republicans.
 
phiwum said:
Pardon me, I meant "repetition".

For the most part, Dumb All Over, you have simply said over and over that Nancy Pelosi in a leadership is good (for Republicans). Yes, we get that. Might be nice if you'd give reasons, but no matter. By the fourteenth repetition, even the slowest among us get that you think Pelosi is good for Republicans.
Click to expand...

I'm in that category and it didn't take too many for me to catch on. By the 14th i'd started assuming that there was some other motive behind the repetition.
 
phiwum said:
Pardon me, I meant "repetition".

For the most part, Dumb All Over, you have simply said over and over that Nancy Pelosi in a leadership is good (for Republicans). Yes, we get that. Might be nice if you'd give reasons, but no matter. By the fourteenth repetition, even the slowest among us get that you think Pelosi is good for Republicans.
Click to expand...

TofuFighter said:
I'm in that category and it didn't take too many for me to catch on. By the 14th i'd started assuming that there was some other motive behind the repetition.
Click to expand...

I started with a thread title and repeated the title three times in the thread. Maybe it's the new math they're teaching these days. In my day, three was a long, long way from fourteen. Or maybe there is so much scary truth to the meme that it is beginning to resonate in your heads, like a gong, loudly banging back and forth until it impairs your thought process to the point when three becomes fourteen.
 
Dumb All Over said:
I started with a thread title and repeated the title three times in the thread. Maybe it's the new math they're teaching these days. In my day, three was a long, long way from fourteen. Or maybe there is so much scary truth to the meme that it is beginning to resonate in your heads, like a gong, loudly banging back and forth until it impairs your thought process to the point when three becomes fourteen.
Click to expand...

Fourteen was intentional exaggeration. Not sure why I should need to explain this to you.

Anyway, nice comeback, imagine how chagrined I am and all. And a more serious thanks for something other than repetition.
 
Dumb All Over said:
Short of resigning her leadership position, I really don't know.

May I ask you the same question?
Click to expand...

She could choose some of her words more carefully, and on a few issues just not comment with talking points. Then again, that might backfire too.

If you don't know what she could change to stop being beneficial to the Republicans, then you don't really know how she's being beneficial to the Republicans. All you have cited is that she's the minority leader. Anyone in that position is.
 
mgidm86 said:
I can try. Maybe the main point is that she is like the Sarah Palin of the left - a confused, probably prescription medication abusing idiot, or at least that is how she appears to me a lot of the time.

She makes some outrageously inane comments - she seems like she has a few screws loose. I think, at times, she makes her party look bad.

That's how I personally feel about her, no clue as what the OP thinks. I don't like her politics or anything else about her.
Click to expand...

That's fine, I loathe everything republickers stand for!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom