This is the most hyperbole-riddled post since the dawn of time.
None of the parties are particularly strong or appealing now. In a way, I do agree with some charges of arrogance on May's part despite Mike G's protestations, but I don't think it has anything to do with her refusal to mix with "inferior ordinary folk". She is not Mary Antoinette, nor is she ensconced in some ivory tower. She apparently
did campaign in places where "inferior ordinary folk":
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...-death-tories-lose-marginal-seats-targted-pm/
But wait! Isn't it the Labour politician guilty of arrogance in this case by believing that the seat is his by right? How dare the Torysa May come here and start talking to my "inferior ordinary folk"? How very dare she!!?
For me, the idea that all votes are up for grabs and that good faith campaigning can be done across the country, is a good thing, not bad. In fact, recent elections have become more depressing because of the micro-targeting either in marginal seats or through social media dark ads.
But I agree that she should have downplayed the perception of arrogance by appearing on the televised debates. This is expected now, and I doubt future party leaders will make the mistake of not showing up.
As for Corbyn being "highly electable", please take a few deep breaths. What made his run so astonishing was that he wasn't completely destroyed. But we would need to see if the PLP will get behind him properly next time to know whether he was electable or not. I think the PLP still see him as radioactive, but they may change their minds.