portlandatheist
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 3,725
I have to agree with everybody else about McCain. I really like the guy but listening to his questions was cringe worthy. He must be getting senile.
It is a political question whether he will be impeached over it. Because Republican scum care more about their party than they do the country, probably not.
President Trump’s personal lawyer on Thursday flatly denied former FBI director James B. Comey’s assertion that Trump asked him for “loyalty” and accused Comey of improperly leaking “privileged communications” with the president.
In a statement after Comey’s appearance before the Senate Intelligence Committee, attorney Marc Kasowitz also asserted that Trump never directed Comey “in form or substance” to stop the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russian officials, and he said Comey’s testimony confirmed that Trump “was not under investigation as part of any probe into Russian interference” in the 2016 election.
Kasowitz took exception with Comey’s written opening statement in which he said that Trump asked for his loyalty during a private, one-on-one dinner at the White House in January. In a memo he wrote after the meeting, Comey quoted Trump as saying: “I need loyalty. I expect loyalty.”
But Kasowitz said Trump never said that.
“The President also never told Mr. Comey, ‘I need loyalty, I expect loyalty’ in form or substance,” Kasowitz said in a written statement, a version of which he read aloud to reporters at the National Press Club. “Of course, the Office of the President is entitled to expect loyalty from those who are serving in an administration, and, from before this President took office to this day, it is overwhelmingly clear that there have been and continue to be those in government who are actively attempting to undermine this administration with selective and illegal leaks of classified information and privileged communications. Mr. Comey has now admitted that he is one of these leakers.”
Good Tweet by Adam Schiff:
[qimg]https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-BWcMnLhNJgk/WTmLvDBvLAI/AAAAAAAAvW0/Opxl02NDiJ4Aujh2y9bI0USasti3icEaACLcB/s1600/Screenshot%2B2017-06-08%2Bat%2B10.38.35%2BAM.png[/qimg]
Why do you believe this to be true?
At least he explained (ie recognized) the incoherent part.Getting sense my q's today went over ppls heads - maybe going fwd I shouldn’t stay up late watching @Dbacks games...
Their problem is that he's a liability whether they hold on to his tail or cut him loose. This is the same problem they have with the christian right. They can't win without them but they alienate a yuge chunk of the electorate. Pretty much true of the majority of the GOP coalition.I suspect that the moment the Republicans in Congress decide that Trump is a political liability rather than an asset, they will turn on him in a big way. OTOH, I'm not sure what it would take to make that happen, given that it hasn't already happened.
Why would Trump's conversations with Comey be privileged ? He's a lawyer but he wasn't Trump's lawyer.
Why would Trump's conversations with Comey be privileged ? He's a lawyer but he wasn't Trump's lawyer.
Executive privilege extends beyond just lawyers.
What Comey admitted was that he had asked a friend to release details from one of those contemporaneous memos to the media. The material in that memo, detailing a conversation between Comey and Trump, was not classified. Note the wording that Kasowitz uses: “selective and illegal leaks of classified information and privileged communications.” He’s conflating “selective” with “illegal” and “classified” with “privileged.” Comey’s was a selective leak of privileged conversation — not anything illegal. He’s lumping in Comey with those who leaked classified information, for rhetorical effect.
...
That Kasowitz indicates he will leave it to the authorities to determine if Comey’s leaks should be investigated suggests that he thinks they will not be. The net effect of this focus on leaks is, of course, to undermine Comey’s testimony.
...
The use of “was not” is important here. Comey did testify that, as of the day he was fired one month ago Friday, Trump was not personally under investigation. Comey also indicated that he didn’t say that publicly because that status might change. The nature of an investigation, after all, is to turn up new information.
Finally, it did “leak” that Trump wasn’t under investigation — Trump said it himself, publicly, in the letter firing Comey.
You can think that all you want. But at the end of the day, Comey stating "No" can very reasonably have an effect on an open investigation.
But several of his questions confused viewers, and seemingly Comey himself, and he occasionally was incoherent. He referred to “President Comey,” and at times looked confused and frustrated with Comey's answers. Viewers clearly thought it was notable; Twitter announced it was the most-tweeted moment of the hearing.
What if McCain pretended to be senile in order to distract people?
(I think him actually being senile is more likely).