Roger Ramjets
Philosopher
No, I have not. However I might consider it if you can convince me that the claims on stevenaverycase.com are false. Specifically, I need solid evidence of the following:-
1. Leslie Eisenberg did not believe that the burn pit was the primary burn site of the body.
2. A fragment of almost every bone in the human body was not found in the burn pit, or if it was then a similar or greater proportion was also found at the dump site.
3. Eisenberg did not find it "highly unlikely" that the bones were not burned in the fire pit.
4. The pelvic bone fragment found at the dump site was linked to Teresa, including evidence that it was left behind when other bones were moved from there to Avery's property.
5. It actually is more likely that "a planter managed to scoop up the tiniest pieces of bones to plant, while forgetting the largest and most obvious."
6. When officers returned to the garage to perform a thorough search and found two bullet fragments, one was not a 'small, partially destroyed fragment in a crack in the cement', and the other was not 'under an air compressor in the back of the garage' - they were actually both planted.
7. The bullet was not matched to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty to have been fired from Avery's exact rifle, or if it was then the State Crime Lab or Calumet County did participate in the frame-job by providing Manitowoc County officers with a bullet and DNA to plant.
8. If Teresa was shot in the back of the head while kneeling or laying on the ground, blood would not have been confined to the area below her head, but in fact would have splattered all over the garage.
9. When blood is transferred into a vial, a needle is not inserted through the rubber cap, so there is no legitimate explanation for a hole being there.
10. The evidence tape on the vial box was not cut in a meeting with Avery's own lawyers.
11. The results of the EDTA test do not make it extremely improbable that Avery's preserved blood was planted in six places in the car.
12. Lenk actually did have the access code to the room where the blood vial was stored, and there are indications that he knew the blood vial existed and he did personally go to the Clerk of Courts office to collect evidence for transfer.
13. In the call between Colborn and the dispatcher, one or both of them did sound 'excited, nervous, or confused' - suggesting that Colborn was looking right at the missing vehicle (and thinking of how it could be used to frame Avery).
14. The car was found on the Avery lot with plates, or even if it wasn't they were not 'folded and stashed in another car on the lot' (because that would indicate a serious effort to hide the identity of the vehicle).
15. Avery actually had plenty of time to crush the car without arousing suspicion.
16. It is not 'highly unlikely' that the police found the car almost immediately after Teresa was reported missing, took an unnoticeable amount of blood from Avery's vial and planted it in six spots in the car, removed the plates, drove it onto the Avery lot without detection, covered it with a car hood and tree branches, and ran across the yard near the residences to hide the plates in another vehicle. In fact this is the most likely scenario (and here's why...).
Last edited:
