• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Valley of the Wood Apes

Status
Not open for further replies.
FAQ in the manual
Q: Is the traffic counter able to count Elusive Upright Hairy Man beasts?

A: No. If they are elusive, they won't be walking in front of the counters.

Q: What if they aren't really elusive, and they huck rocks at us, and do bluff charges to warn us of their presence?

A: Why would they huck rocks at you, and alert you to their presence if they were elusive?
Click to expand...
 
jerrywayne said:
If I understand NAWAC's photo on their Facebook page, which appears to show actor Rob Lowe with some team members, and with a caption that read something like "look what happened on spring break," then their posting the following web announcement makes sense:

http://deadline.com/2017/03/rob-lowe-mystery-reality-series-ordered-ae-network-1202047184/
Click to expand...

This^^^^^
I guess they'll have to come with a location for the show, since according to Jodie it's all a fantasy world.
 
Last edited:
Resume said:
Is your claim that the NAWACers made up area x out of whole cloth and never spent any time at all looking for wood monkey's in OK?
Click to expand...

Yes, that's exactly what I think. Rob Lowe's interest in the area doesn't change my opinion. Lowe is only a high school graduate whose career has mostly been as an actor, how would he know if what they tell him is real, accurate, or true? Would it really matter when it comes to making a TV show? Fantasy will work just as well.
 
Last edited:
Jodie said:
Yes, Rob Lowe aside, we'll see if Area X makes the editing cut. I seriously doubt it unless some of the members get out there and throw rocks at the roof while Rob's there, but that isn't exactly riveting television.
Click to expand...
Everyone involved with the NAWAC is lying?
 
Resume said:
Everyone involved with the NAWAC is lying?
Click to expand...

Exactly who and how many are involved? You can sit up in an office and post online as 20 different people. Who would know the difference if no one ever bothered to check to see if these people actually exist.
 
Jodie said:
Exactly who and how many are involved? You can sit up in an office and post online as 20 different people. Who would know the difference if no one ever bothered to check to see if these people actually exist.
Click to expand...

Brian Brown, Alton Higgins, Daryl Colyer and Bob and Kathy Strain all exist.

Are they all lying?
 
Last edited:
Resume said:
Brian Brown, Alton Higgins, Daryl Colyer and Bob and Kathy Strain all exist.

Are they all lying?
Click to expand...

Yes, either on purpose or as a result of self delusion. That's just 5 people, 5 people can't lie? I find it hard to believe that this hasn't occurred to anyone.
 
Last edited:
Jodie said:
Yes, either on purpose or as a result of self delusion. That's just 5 people, 5 people can't lie?
Click to expand...
Oh I'm all for the lying hypothesis. I'm just trying to understand your hypothesis as it relates to the NAWAC.

Why don't you lay the whole thing out for us?

You edited.

I find it hard to believe that this hasn't occurred to anyone.
Click to expand...
You're joking, right?
 
Last edited:
Resume said:
Oh I'm all for the lying hypothesis. I'm just trying to understand your hypothesis as it relates to the NAWAC.

Why don't you lay the whole thing out for us?
Click to expand...

I think the whole thing is made up. I don't think there is continuous "research" going on anywhere, no Operation Houdini, no Operation Skulking, no Operation Vigil, or whatever thing they are calling it at the moment, is happening. There might be a core group that visits that cabin for two weeks out of the year but that's probably the extent of it, if that, just to hunt. Other than that, nothing is happening, nothing is going on. They may have filed some kind of tax status on their group to keep from having to declare membership dues as income but I seriously doubt very many of those members ever see this supposed Area X.


You edited.
Click to expand...

Yes and?


You're joking, right?
Click to expand...

I've read ABP's posts about it but I don't recall anyone saying that they absolutely thought there was no Area X, no research, etc....other than talking about how small the area in the pics happened to be despite NAWAC's claims about the research area's remoteness.
 
Jodie said:
I think the whole thing is made up.
Click to expand...
What evidence can you provide for this hypothesis?


I've read ABP's posts about it but I don't recall anyone saying that they absolutely thought there was no Area X, no research, etc....other than talking about how small the area in the pics happened to be despite NAWAC's claims about the research area's remoteness.
Click to expand...

Pretty much everyone posting here doubts many NAWACer claims; these doubts are usually addressed in specific posts regarding those specific claims. What specifically leads you to claim there is no area x and what evidence can you provide to bolster your claim?
 
Last edited:
Resume said:
What evidence can you provide for this hypothesis?
Click to expand...

Why would I need evidence of bigfoot research?

Pretty much everyone posting here doubts many NAWACer claims; these doubts are usually addressed in specific posts regarding these specific claims. What specifically leads you to claim there is no area x and what evidence can you provide to bolster your claim?
Click to expand...

My proof wouldn't be any better than theirs' even if I had proof. How many times have you people argued that pics, video, and story telling isn't proof? Bigfoot doesn't exist so the only conclusion I could draw is that the entire thing is some kind of tax evasion scheme having to do with the income produced by the organization.

The only way to prove it is to actually drive out to the area and walk back to the location to know for sure. That would only amount to personal proof since nothing one could provide in the way of photos or video would stand up to scrutiny here on the forum. I don't care enough to bother because it's about whether someone is lying about their bigfoot research. I think that's a given.
 
Resume said:
I asked if you could provide evidence for your claim:

Because if you could, then /thread.
Click to expand...

Well maybe one day someone will have the time, the means, and the inclination to check it out. I don't know that we need another Wood Ape thread, it would fit nicely here.
 
Jodie said:
Well maybe one day someone will have the time, the means, and the inclination to check it out. I don't know that we need another Wood Ape thread, it would fit nicely here.
Click to expand...

No, I meant [/thread].

Too bad, I was counting on you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom