ChristianProgressive
Master Poster
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2014
- Messages
- 2,860
His duty is to report it when it happens, not when he's been fired.
Not when doing so would jeopardize an ongoing investigation.
His duty is to report it when it happens, not when he's been fired.
The subject should never had been broached.Expressing any desire (beyond following the law) regarding a particular ongoing investigation by the FBI is at least inappropriate for a sitting President.
Firing Comey certainly hurts Trump's case should this progress further.Expressing the desire that the FBI director end the investigation is a clear attempt to obstruct justice given that the occupant of the Oval Office has the power to fire that person.
Just the kind of person Trump is looking for.
Are you suggesting that failure to report obstruction violates some law or something? If so, what law?
I'm sure we will. Comey is legendary with this stuff. George W. felt Comey's sting with the Ashcroft hospital incidentLol
Okay, fine lets see it then.
His duty is to report it when it happens, not when he's been fired.
Not once said FBI director has indeed been fired with the flimsiest excuse possible.No, it's a bit more difficult to prove obstruction that that.
Help who's case? Comey's no longer part of the investigation. I'm sure the appropriate FBI officials have all Comey's notes. They are proceeding where Comey left offI'm not a lawyer, but the way he's presenting it now seems to hurt his case tremendously.
The leak could be a trial balloon. Shake the tree and see what falls out.If it was part of the larger case, why is it coming out now?
We pretty much are.Be interesting if we could be privy to the battle between his narcissism and paranoia!
Joe Lieberman? A doddering old sellout? What nonsense.
It seems like the most reasonable conclusion.Why does Flynn matter so much to Trump anyway? Why does Trump need to go out on a limb for a guy whom he fired for lying to the VP?! Makes me think Flynn has dirt on Trump.
It's obstruction in any reasonable spirit of the law; whether there's a defensive technicality, I don't know.No, it's a bit more difficult to prove obstruction that that.
Trump has certainly made FBI Director an attractive job! I can just imagine a long line of well-respected, highly talented people queuing up for the opportunity! What a great chance to destroy one's life-long career and reputation after a few weeks of absolute hell in office.
Nope. I just watched a segment of Fox News for as long as tolerable, and they proved it's all a Liberal plot.
Or maybe there is plenty to this, and it can hurt him.Yeah, and I would wager that reason was a combination of it making him feel powerful to be able to fire the FBI director and him being irritated with the investigation drawing on. I think he got frustrated with the endless stuff about Russia and impulsively fired Comey because he thought of it as a way to lash out at the whole Russia narrative, throw his power around, and he stupidly thought the dems would not react like this because "they don't like Comey either" and thought this would be a freebie.
But I think all of that is entirely compatible with the Russia thing being 100% BS. Because Trump isn't restrained or calm enough to think to himself "there's nothing to this, and in time that will be revealed, or at least nothing particularly devastating to me can result from this because there's nothing to it. I'll just let them spin their wheels on this as long as they want to."
Nope. I just watched a segment of Fox News for as long as tolerable, and they proved it's all a Liberal plot.
There is now a Special Council on the case.
A "council" is a grouping of people. A "counsel" is an advisor or, more commonly, an attorney (the word can also be used for the advice such a person might offer).There is now a Special Council on the case.
Vast left wing conspiracy!Nope. I just watched a segment of Fox News for as long as tolerable, and they proved it's all a Liberal plot.