Ed Clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham Part 3

[Ziggurat]

Why the specifics?

Because they demonstrate the point. Obviously.

You know as well as I do that every single knock on her has already "been approved" by the electorate. We've had presidents that weren't charismatic before.

That's not the way things work. A lack of charisma isn't always a deal breaker, but it's always a negative. Collect too many negatives and not enough positives, and a candidate will lose, regardless of whether someone with any one of those specific qualities has won before.

The only real thing that separates her is her gender.

You still have yet to provide any evidence that this hurt her. You waive it around as the answer because you can't think of anything else. But that isn't evidence.

 

[Skeptic Ginger]

MSNBC of all things was playing in the gym of Mom's old folks home and a lady sitting on a recumbent cross-trainer was badmouthing Trump. She didn't like anything he did. But then she said she wouldn't have voted for Hillary if she was the last person on Earth. I didn't have the patience to draw her out, (too noisy anyway) but I was curious. She said she didn't vote, so it wasn't about preferring a 3rd-party candidate.

I wonder how many Bernie supporters refused to back Clinton.

All the ones who underestimated just how bad Trump was going to be.

 

[NoahFence]

That's not the way things work. A lack of charisma isn't always a deal breaker, but it's always a negative. Collect too many negatives and not enough positives, and a candidate will lose

Yea I'm still trying to figure out how anyone of sane mind could look at the two and see the positives in Trump's favor.
He's an admitted sexual predator who was in far more real hot water than Hillary Clinton ever was, and that's before he announced his candidacy.

Aside from Clinton being female i don't see it. And not one of you has even attempted to explain it.

 

[thaiboxerken]

You kids can piss and moan all you want about emails, the fact remains she did nothing many other presidents have done - and not a word about it. You know for a face that Trump is in every possible way, worse. But that's ok.

The only thing you people couldn't stomach was that she was a woman.

Some fools so don't understand that the mission of having the hearings was fulfilled. Hillary lost. She was never got of breaking any law. This is why the Repugnants have not made a deal of it.

 

[The Big Dog]

Some fools so don't understand that the mission of having the hearings was fulfilled. Hillary lost. She was never got of breaking any law. This is why the Repugnants have not made a deal of it.

Yeah, the purpose was fulfilled. The despicable liar was exposed.

Cannot believe this lying loser douchebag still has defenders.

Wise up, I told you five years ago she was a *********** total loser.

 

[NoahFence]

Yeah, the purpose was fulfilled. The despicable liar was exposed.

Man up.

Why is she despicable because of her lies, while your boy Trump isn't?

 

[Ziggurat]

Yea I'm still trying to figure out how anyone of sane mind could look at the two and see the positives in Trump's favor.

That's precisely the problem: you can't figure out why someone would think differently than you.

Aside from Clinton being female i don't see it. And not one of you has even attempted to explain it.

You have yet to provide any evidence that her being female had anything to do with anything. Your inability to imagine other reasons isn't proof of anything except your own lack of imagination.

And this isn't a new issue. Nobody is trying to explain it because at this point, why bother? Nobody can make you see what you don't want to see.

 

[Ziggurat]

Man up.

Wow, that's really sexist of you.

No wonder you think Hillary lost because of her gender.

 

[Roger Ramjets]

Yeah, the purpose was fulfilled. The despicable liar was exposed.

Trump was exposed, but the deplorables love a liar - just so long as he's on their 'side'.

Cannot believe this lying loser douchebag still has defenders.

Deplorables are masters of projection.

 

[The Great Zaganza]

Wow, that's really sexist of you.

No wonder you think Hillary lost because of her gender.

Evading the question...

 

[pgwenthold]

Man up.

Why is she despicable because of her lies, while your boy Trump isn't?

See, women are expected to be kind and nurturing. Men, otoh, are expected to be ********. Therefore, Clinton fails and Trump wins!

But don't call them sexist.

 

[The Big Dog]

Man up.

Why is she despicable because of her lies, while your boy Trump isn't?

Oh mercy, guess we ran out of sexism cards so we went 180 degrees in the opposite direction.

I was warning people about what an execrable candidate Hillary was YEARS before she lost to Donald Trump.

Trump is not my boy, he is Hillary's boy, he is Hillary's supporters boy.

This is on Hillary and her fans.

 

[NoahFence]

Evading the question...

It's what they do.

And if you answer theirs, they ignore it and pretend you never did.

Vey dishonest. But with no moral compass, eh...who cares?

 

[Ziggurat]

It's what they do.

And if you answer theirs, they ignore it and pretend you never did.

Vey dishonest. But with no moral compass, eh...who cares?

You aren't in any position to lecture me. You still haven't presented any evidence that Hillary's sex had anything to do with anything.

 

[NoahFence]

That's precisely the problem: you can't figure out why someone would think differently than you.

Exactly. I don't get the thought process of someone who thinks it's OK to mock POWs. I don't get the thought process of someone who thinks it's OK to grab pussy or walk in on minors in various states of undress.

Please explain it to me.

Bonus points if you can manage to refrain from mentioning Hillary

 

[The Big Dog]

It's what they do.

And if you answer theirs, they ignore it and pretend you never did.

Vey dishonest. But with no moral compass, eh...who cares?

maybe you should post a clever emoji and tell people to "man up"?

 

[NoahFence]

You aren't in any position to lecture me. You still haven't presented any evidence that Hillary's sex had anything to do with anything.

I have. You're too dishonest to notice.

 

[Ziggurat]

I have. You're too dishonest to notice.

Your "evidence" consists of an argument from incredulity. Which is a fallacy, not actual evidence.

 

[The Big Dog]

I have. You're too dishonest to notice.

false.

 

[NoahFence]

Your "evidence" consists of an argument from incredulity. Which is a fallacy, not actual evidence.

At this point you're just lying.
Why?

I've shown that the only major difference is her gender and you don't argue against it.