Way to miss the point...
If you really think a vote for Labour is worse than a vote for Tory then I can only despair but let's not try to hide the decision behind such nonsense. If you would prefer TM to JC in charge then go for it. But those people who make that decision are 100% to blame for their decision and its implications.
Of course there have always been Welsh Tories but my point was that its not an honest comparison when people talking about how the Tories winning in Wales was unthinkable a while ago. It's a very different situation now.
It's not about 'blame' necessarily as it is about acknowledging the causes and having an honest discussion.
The idea that solid Labour voters are suddenly turning to Tory or UKIP because of Jeremy Corbyn or that they can be won back by a 'centre left' politician in a nice suit (and by centre left we of course mean centre right) is a convenient narrative but not necessarily one that makes a hell of a lot of sense.
Of course it could be that the Welsh people are really that stupid but I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt.
Yeah, you didn't really have a point. You had a soundbite. A cheap attempt at a gotcha. Nobody was got however.
Have I ever said this ?
No, there was a point, and you still haven't got it, despite how basic it was.
Well, England is supposed to have a civil war every odd century or so anyway, the 19th was an exception, the 21st could well be a return to the norm.
McHrozni
Not directly but you have very carefully danced around it.
You have said you could never vote Labour because of Corbyn.
I don't think you have ever said you could never vote Tory.
And your logic for why these Welsh voters are voting Tory was because the other options are all so bad but again conveniently missed out that the Tory option is worse.
So there are only a limited number of conclusions there - either you do think that Tory is a better outcome than Labour, or you disagree with these voters who are voting Tory and don't actually think they have a good reason for doing so.
Scuttlebut within the Labour party (I don't know how reliable it is) is that the troubles in Wales are arising from a confluence of three things: Jermery Corbyn, the problems of the Welsh Labour party and Welsh leave voters who traditionally voted Labour but feel that current MPs who voted against Brexit need to be "punished" for not accepting the will of the people.
Scuttlebut within the Labour party (I don't know how reliable it is) is that the troubles in Wales are arising from a confluence of three things: Jermery Corbyn, the problems of the Welsh Labour party and Welsh leave voters who traditionally voted Labour but feel that current MPs who voted against Brexit need to be "punished" for not accepting the will of the people.
That's your opinion and one I do not share
Well strictly speaking I cannot currently vote Labour because of its stance on Brexit but that's largely to the influence of the Corbynites
I've also probably never said that I couldn't drown a sackful of puppies just for gits and shiggles - because it's not even something I'd consider.
Errrr no. I was pointing out the logic for not voting Labour. I was saying that I couldn't blame the Welsh for not voting Labour given the direction in which Corbyn and his cronies have taken the party.
Who to vote for instead of Labour is an entirely different question and in my case it comes down to three options.
- Plaid - whose central policy, independence for Wales, I'm not in favour of
- LibDems - Under the FPTP system a wasted vote in many constituencies
- Spoil the paper - actually a wasted vote
Right now I'd still judge that voting Labour is a less bad outcome than Tory but given that both parties are pro-Brexit then on the single most important issue the UK has faced in my lifetime and likely the most important in what remains of it, they are both counter to my own views.
With the Tories we have a bunch where their hearts are IMO in the wrong place but at least they have pockets of competence when it comes to governing (though they are rapidly shrinking as they cave to certain vested interests). With Labour we have a bunch where their hearts are largely in the right place (though I agree that recent anti-immigrant rhetoric is worrying) but who appear to be wholly unfit to govern. In a choice where these are the only two options I cannot honestly tell you where I would cast my vote. Fortunately I have more options than that.
In another masterstroke from the political Titan The Guardian are reporting that Corbyn will apparently not take part in any TV debates if his good friend Mrs May won't:
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...b0e81396c86de5#block-59009dbee4b0e81396c86de5
I assume there must be some logic behind turning down the good publicity of doing a debate that the PM refuses to deign to do, but for the life of me I can't think of any reason not to do it beyond staggering political incompetence.
Can anyone answer: "If Jeremy were actually in the pay of the Conservatives, what would he be doing differently?"