LTC8K6
Penultimate Amazing
2010 Seven companies are licensed to produce energy using the Blacklight Power process.
http://www.businesswire.com/news/ho...nnounces-Commercial-License-Europe-GEOENERGIE
2010 This whole deal is ready to go. Reactors are operating and have been ordered. All the critics have been put in their place.
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-402579
Even competitors are having success with hydrinos in 2010.
Note also that in this piece from 2010, the possibility of harm from hydrinos is mentioned.
Now we go to 2012, and what do we have?
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-793467
The hydrino reactor is stalled and we have working CIHT cells. The reactor needed a "bipolar plate" which hadn't been invented yet. Which seems odd given the 2010 report.
In 2014 we now have the new SF-CIHT cell that has been validated and replicated and maybe the state and federal governments are going to adopt it.
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1075351
http://www.businesswire.com/news/ho...nnounces-Commercial-License-Europe-GEOENERGIE
2010 This whole deal is ready to go. Reactors are operating and have been ordered. All the critics have been put in their place.
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-402579
Six utilities using conventional fuel to serve up 7.6 megawatts of power to their 1 million customers have ordered hydrino reactors - in deals worth up to $500 million - to generate 8 megawatts at about one cent per kilowatt.
While major utilities are already poring over engineering plans to build the plants they've ordered from BlackLight Power, energy officials and the President are promoting the construction of hundreds of new, unneeded and extremely expensive nuclear plants.
His BlackLight Process, already well-established in roughly 20 test-bed prototype 50- and 75-kilowatt reactors, promises power plants that will produce unlimited power but cost only as much as a gas-fired plant to build, about $1,500 a kilowatt, and then will have no further cost for fuel. None. Zero. Zip. Not a penny for solar, wind, plutonium, uranium, gas, coal or oil or any other fuel.
The hydrino, thankfully, has not cooperated with Mills' critics. In test after test, and now with operating reactors and contracts - albeit one in which no money changes hands until the technology is delivered, according to one utility spokesman - for much larger ones, Mills has left them gaping.
Even competitors are having success with hydrinos in 2010.
The American Reporter has learned that a hydrino-driven HHO cell is in development, and a hydrino-fueled automotive engine - known as SPICE - that optimally would self-regenerate (thus needing no fueling station) is in the works, according to a Sebastopol, Calif.-based BlackLight competitor called Chava Energy, which contacted us to comment on this article. Chava says the HHO-hydrino device, would cost $5 million to develop and be available in less than 18 months. The SPICE engine prototype, costing about $200 million, would be finished in three years, the company said.
Note also that in this piece from 2010, the possibility of harm from hydrinos is mentioned.
Now we go to 2012, and what do we have?
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-793467
The hydrino reactor is stalled and we have working CIHT cells. The reactor needed a "bipolar plate" which hadn't been invented yet. Which seems odd given the 2010 report.
A report on the hydrino reactor by MIT scientist Terry Copeland, PhD., said a 10-watt demonstration model should be "achievable near term", and 100-watt, 1,000-watt and larger systems would follow that, Goodwin suggested.
The invention of a "bipolar plate" that allows power output to be scaled up was key to the commercial viability of the reactors, Copeland said. The company said a 1.5 kW plant to power the average-size home should be operational in 2013, it said. BLP has failed to meet deadlines for demonstrations in the past, but the devices demonstrated in December and January by the reporting scientists - in some cases as they watched their construction - seem capable of reaching that goal.
"BLP has successfully fabricated and tested CIHT cells capable of producing net electrical output up to 50 times that input to maintain the process,” according to Dr. Copeland, who has served as a product development specialist for DuPont and Duracell. "Some cells have produced steady power for over one month. The power generation is consistent with Dr. Mills’ theory of energy release resulting from Hydrino formation. No other source of energy could be identified.
"The CIHT cell will use cheap, abundant, nontoxic, commodity chemicals, with no apparent long-term supply issues that might preclude commercial, high volume manufacturing," Copekland added. "The capital cost of the CIHT cell based on optimization of the cell dimensions is estimated to be under $100/kW compared to at least ten times that for fuel cells that further require a source of hydrogen or hydrogen gas and a fuel infrastructure.”
In 2014 we now have the new SF-CIHT cell that has been validated and replicated and maybe the state and federal governments are going to adopt it.
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1075351