New telepathy test, the sequel.

Perhaps, but you've been at this for years with no satisfying results. Why not give a different methodology a try?



Then you should definitely give one of the methods that ensures all participants are necessarily fully cooperative a go, rather than repeating the same flawed test over and over again.

I think the answer would be obvious to all but one of the posters in this thread: any reasonable test would remove bias and show that Michel has no telepathy. He ran shrieking from the room the last time such a test was proposed.
 
He should include "no" as one of the options next time, and claim all of the nopes here as evidence of future telepathy.
 
...
Then you should definitely give one of the methods that ensures all participants are necessarily fully cooperative a go, rather than repeating the same flawed test over and over again.
This is why I introduced my simple credibility method: when people seem to be serious and reliable, then their answers seem to be more closely related to the correct one.
I remind you that you should in principle reply one of the following seven words:
... "gas", "illegal", "bombs", "two", "sides", "same", and "coin" ...
in this test.
Don't be afraid of trying, even if you are incorrect, your fellow skeptics won't be able to eat you, if you do ;). Those who are too scared of failing will never encounter success, because they've not at least tried.
 
This is why I introduced my simple credibility method: when people seem to be serious and reliable, then their answers seem to be more closely related to the correct one.
I remind you that you should in principle reply one of the following seven words:

in this test.
Don't be afraid of trying, even if you are incorrect, your fellow skeptics won't be able to eat you, if you do ;). Those who are too scared of failing will never encounter success, because they've not at least tried.
And everyone is telling you "No" because we all know what you will do with any answer. You will simply make things up.

Sent from my SM-A300FU using Tapatalk
 
Don't give the para parrot ideas.
I doubt anything we say here is capable of dislodging whatever's currently in his head.

Writing and circling "telepathy is hogwash" should also receive an above-chance hit rate.
 
This is why I introduced my simple credibility method: when people seem to be serious and reliable, then their answers seem to be more closely related to the correct one.
I remind you that you should in principle reply one of the following seven words:

in this test.
Don't be afraid of trying, even if you are incorrect, your fellow skeptics won't be able to eat you, if you do ;). Those who are too scared of failing will never encounter success, because they've not at least tried.


Again I say no to you! No!
 
We are the Knights of Nay.
On this One Subject we agray.
Nivver to feed facts to folly,
Or follow Michel's fallacious way.
 
Last edited:
I doubt anything we say here is capable of dislodging whatever's currently in his head.

Writing and circling "telepathy is hogwash" should also receive an above-chance hit rate.

Worse yet any and I do mean any reply has, can, and will be twisted into an answer.

A simple no can be read as the numbers: 2, 29, 11, 1, 7

Character or not he will reply quoting several or more of you and show why your responses were answers.

Short and sweet. Do Not Reply. Period.
 
Last edited:
This is why I introduced my simple credibility method: when people seem to be serious and reliable, then their answers seem to be more closely related to the correct one.

This is nonsense, as you know. You should use one of the suggested methods which ensures that the only people who can participate are necessarily fully cooperative.

Don't be afraid of trying, even if you are incorrect, your fellow skeptics won't be able to eat you, if you do ;). Those who are too scared of failing will never encounter success, because they've not at least tried.

I'm not going to help feed your delusion, only suggest that you try a real test of your abilities, rather than repeating the same unreliable, easily gamed "test" you've been running sporadically for the last 4 years. If you truly believe in your abilities then you have no reason not to. Even if just to shut other people up doing a proper test once in 4 years isn't going to hurt, is it? If you don't truly believe in your abilities, then what are you doing?
 
I recently wrote and circled one of the seven words: "gas", "illegal", "bombs", "two", "sides", "same", and "coin" on my paper.

I ask you to write it here (if you think you might know it).

Thank you for participating.
At least you said "if". It seems unlikely anyone would think they might know it.
 
I would like to give now some results of my latest telepathy test, which I started about eleven days ago:
I recently wrote and circled one of the seven words: "gas", "illegal", "bombs", "two", "sides", "same", and "coin" on my paper.

I ask you to write it here (if you think you might know it).

Thank you for participating.
The answer to the test was "two" (i.e. the fourth word; I chose it simply because the random number generator I used told me "4", so I wrote and circled the fourth word of the list of choices on my paper, this is my usual method). Note that, because of the relatively large number of possible choices, and because of a possible confusion between "four" and "two", this was a difficult test.

Superficially, no one participated in this test on this forum. However, many people replied (somewhat oddly - I have already done about 20 telepathy tests on this forum in the past 5 years, and I have never seen anything like this) "No", which is obviously a two-letter word:
Not no, but hell no.

Not This Again!
Again I say no to you! No!
Interestingly, Nay_Sayer commented:
A simple no can be read as the numbers: 2, ...
Even Bashar al-Assad, the President of Syria, seems to have loosely participated in this test:

9t3YUG7.jpg


This picture seems to have been taken on April 12 (Damascus time):
http://pulse.ng/world/in-syria-assad-says-chemical-attack-100-percent-fabrication-id6526803.html.
I started my test on April 10 (Belgium time).
 
I would like to give now some results of my latest telepathy test, which I started about eleven days ago:

The answer to the test was "two" (i.e. the fourth word; I chose it simply because the random number generator I used told me "4", so I wrote and circled the fourth word of the list of choices on my paper, this is my usual method). Note that, because of the relatively large number of possible choices, and because of a possible confusion between "four" and "two", this was a difficult test.

Superficially, no one participated in this test on this forum. However, many people replied (somewhat oddly - I have already done about 20 telepathy tests on this forum in the past 5 years, and I have never seen anything like this) "No", which is obviously a two-letter word:


Interestingly, Nay_Sayer commented:

Even Bashar al-Assad, the President of Syria, seems to have loosely participated in this test:

[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/9t3YUG7.jpg?1[/qimg]

This picture seems to have been taken on April 12 (Damascus time):
http://pulse.ng/world/in-syria-assad-says-chemical-attack-100-percent-fabrication-id6526803.html.
I started my test on April 10 (Belgium time).

And this is why you run shrieking from any semblance of a valid test, and why we refuse to be enablers for your delusions.
 
I called this, Actually I call it correctly every time.

my hit percentage is 100%

I cannot stress enough; DO NOT REPLY!
 

Back
Top Bottom