philkensebben
Illuminator
This morning, for the first time in ages, I ate two TWO TWO slices of toast.
Oh.....my........god.
Oh.....my........god.
This latest iteration must surely be the ultimate proof that there is no reply that Michel cannot wilfully misinterpret as support for his delusions.I cannot stress enough; DO NOT REPLY!
Michel does not pick up on sarcasm. He will interpret this as support.This morning, for the first time in ages, I ate two TWO TWO slices of toast.
Oh.....my........god.
This latest iteration must surely be the ultimate proof that there is no reply that Michel cannot wilfully misinterpret as support for his delusions.
Michel does not pick up on sarcasm. He will interpret this as support.
Please guys. The next time Michel posts one of his ******** tests simply ignore it. Any response at all will be counterproductive. We cannot help him.
At most a few minutes after I posted the analysis quoted above, the forum went down (it remained down for about seven and a half hours).I would like to give now some results of my latest telepathy test, ...
(PEBCAK is an acronym which seems to mean "user error": https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/PEBCAK)fixed. PEBCAK bug.
But this is not possible (though nobody objected to rjh01's post), because Oystein's message was posted four minutes after mine.Your wish is my command
This is the last post before the crash.
The current summary on the German Wikipedia - my translation:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansch...Dortmund#Festnahme_eines_Tatverd.C3.A4chtigen
I would like to give now some results of my latest telepathy test, which I started about eleven days ago:
The answer to the test was "two" (i.e. the fourth word; I chose it simply because the random number generator I used told me "4", so I wrote and circled the fourth word of the list of choices on my paper, this is my usual method). Note that, because of the relatively large number of possible choices, and because of a possible confusion between "four" and "two", this was a difficult test.
Superficially, no one participated in this test on this forum. However, many people replied (somewhat oddly - I have already done about 20 telepathy tests on this forum in the past 5 years, and I have never seen anything like this) "No", which is obviously a two-letter word:
Interestingly, Nay_Sayer commented:
Even Bashar al-Assad, the President of Syria, seems to have loosely participated in this test:
[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/9t3YUG7.jpg?1[/qimg]
This picture seems to have been taken on April 12 (Damascus time):
http://pulse.ng/world/in-syria-assad-says-chemical-attack-100-percent-fabrication-id6526803.html.
I started my test on April 10 (Belgium time).
if your replies were a series of four letter words, would you have called it a hit?I would like to give now some results of my latest telepathy test, which I started about eleven days ago:
The answer to the test was "two" (i.e. the fourth word; I chose it simply because the random number generator I used told me "4", so I wrote and circled the fourth word of the list of choices on my paper, this is my usual method). Note that, because of the relatively large number of possible choices, and because of a possible confusion between "four" and "two", this was a difficult test.
Superficially, no one participated in this test on this forum. However, many people replied (somewhat oddly - I have already done about 20 telepathy tests on this forum in the past 5 years, and I have never seen anything like this) "No", which is obviously a two-letter word:
Interestingly, Nay_Sayer commented:
Even Bashar al-Assad, the President of Syria, seems to have loosely participated in this test:
[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/9t3YUG7.jpg?1[/qimg]
This picture seems to have been taken on April 12 (Damascus time):
http://pulse.ng/world/in-syria-assad-says-chemical-attack-100-percent-fabrication-id6526803.html.
I started my test on April 10 (Belgium time).
At most a few minutes after I posted the analysis quoted above, the forum went down (it remained down for about seven and a half hours).
On its facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/internationalskeptics/ , the forum owner replied to a question about this incident with:
(PEBCAK is an acronym which seems to mean "user error": https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/PEBCAK)
But, which user was he talking about? I don't know.
So, why do you think did this little incident happen? Do you think it was related to my post? (warning: honest answers are always more interesting than lies, of course) Or was it, in your opinion, just purely fortuitous coincidence, that this downtime began very shortly after my latest post?
Note: rjh01 said, about this crash
But this is not possible (though nobody objected to rjh01's post), because Oystein's message was posted four minutes after mine.
The time of Oystein's post:The forum went down because someone (Icerat or someone in his employ) did something wrong. It had nothing to do with you, nor was it any way related to you or your posts. The last post before the downtime was Oystein's, not yours.
is 21st April 2017, 06:19 PM UTC.The current summary on the German Wikipedia - my translation:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansch...Dortmund#Festnahme_eines_Tatverd.C3.A4chtigen
is 21st April 2017, 06:23 PM UTC.I would like to give now some results of my latest telepathy test, ...
...
But this is not possible (though nobody objected to rjh01's post), becauseOystein's message was posted four minutes after mine.
(error correction, sorry about this)...
But this is not possible (though nobody objected to rjh01's post), because I posted my last message before the breakdown four minutes after Oystein posted his or her message.
The time of Oystein's post:
is 21st April 2017, 06:19 PM UTC.
The time of my post:
is 21st April 2017, 06:23 PM UTC.
So my message was posted four minutes later than Oystein's post, which was therefore not the last one before the crash.
(error correction, sorry about this)
I got the impression that rjh01 wanted to make fun of me by suggesting "I am a German" (we all know WWII, even if we did not live it).
I also had the impression that the previous crash of this forum did have a certain telepathic nature as well.
Well, I am in a tough struggle to have my apparent telepathic nature recognized by society, I cannot neglect possibly interesting evidence.You think everything is telepathic in nature, What difference does a forum crash make?
Well, I am in a tough struggle to have my apparent telepathic nature recognized by society, I cannot neglect possibly interesting evidence.
You don't really expect your average schizophrenic to trigger a forum crash when he posts a message of a possibly somewhat politically sensitive nature.
The forum went down because someone (Icerat or someone in his employ) did something wrong. It had nothing to do with you, nor was it any way related to you or your posts. The last post before the downtime was Oystein's, not yours.



Well, I am in a tough struggle to have my apparent telepathic nature recognized by society, I cannot neglect possibly interesting evidence.
You don't really expect your average schizophrenic to trigger a forum crash when he posts a message of a possibly somewhat politically sensitive nature.
Today, 04:44 AM #646
Agatha
See- indisputable proof!!!
Agatha posted at 4.44am.....
thats 22.2222
and the post numbaer was 646
222 22 222
thats twice (2!!) times that a string of 2's appeared in a post about the forum crash- by a mod no less!!!
INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE!!!!1!!!!
![]()
Well, I am in a tough struggle to have my apparent telepathic nature recognized by society[...]
Sarcasm doesn't work here.