• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator

Status
Not open for further replies.
All joking aside, I gave up on trying to get hydrino samples from BLP and decided to make my own. The basic reactor design is pretty easy to build without violating any of BLP's few valid patents. They really screwed themselves by never hiring a competent patent attorney. Whoever the idiot is they DID hire exposed their tech without protecting it.

My test reactor is capturing the hydrino gas into a combustion chamber fed with oxygen to produce a form of heavy water.

Inert my ass. This stuff reacts with glass if you don't chemically bond it. Even the hydrino water is more corrosive than regular water. Iron frigging fizzes when exposed to this stuff. I've paused development on the reactor while I work on ways to process the hydrino waste. The messed up electron shells mean chemical reactivity seems to vary from hydrino to hydrino. I scavenged the Americium-241 from an old smoke detector and put it in a compression chamber with some of the hydrino gas. At about 30 PSI the whole thing melted down.

I borrowed a few pages from my late grandfather's fusion reactor work. He worked on the liquid sodium phase of the experimental fusion reactor's coolant system. I'm using liquid aluminum as an intermediary between the reactor core and the steam generator I'll use for actual power generation. This has the added benefit of shielding the water from Hydrinos.
 
Last edited:
All very impressive and all, but once I stuck a pocket knife into a multi powerpoint adapter while it was plugged in. There were sparks and everything. You will be relieved to know I did not die. I wasn't even injured although I got a shock. Must have been the hydrinos.

Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk
 
halleyscomet said:
All joking aside, I gave up on trying to get hydrino samples from BLP and decided to make my own. The basic reactor design is pretty easy to build without violating any of BLP's few valid patents. They really screwed themselves by never hiring a competent patent attorney. Whoever the idiot is they DID hire exposed their tech without protecting it.

My test reactor is capturing the hydrino gas into a combustion chamber fed with oxygen to produce a form of heavy water.

Inert my ass. This stuff reacts with glass if you don't chemically bond it. Even the hydrino water is more corrosive than regular water. Iron frigging fizzes when exposed to this stuff. I've paused development on the reactor while I work on ways to process the hydrino waste. The messed up electron shells mean chemical reactivity seems to vary from hydrino to hydrino. I scavenged the Americium-241 from an old smoke detector and put it in a compression chamber with some of the hydrino gas. At about 30 PSI the whole thing melted down.

I borrowed a few pages from my late grandfather's fusion reactor work. He worked on the liquid sodium phase of the experimental fusion reactor's coolant system. I'm using liquid aluminum as an intermediary between the reactor core and the steam generator I'll use for actual power generation. This has the added benefit of shielding the water from Hydrinos.
Click to expand...



Brilliant work, I applaud you!
 
Horatius said:
Brilliant work, I applaud you!
Click to expand...


Thank you. I think my major advantage over Mills and his team is I'm looking towards rapid commercialization as opposed to chasing one idealized "just right" fantasy deployment after another. Solar panels to get energy from a massive heat source? Seriously? I'm going to harness the heat directly for a much higher electrical output.
 
Darat said:
They've had the photovoltaic array for a month now any sign of that public demonstration?
Click to expand...



"Soon."

c63b2479ae8b8211b5e59666ca04c3c6.jpg
 
aleCcowaN said:
Again michaelsuede is taming vocabulary.
Click to expand...

Lying. :)

There are a number of forms lying takes, and only the simplest (the direct lie) is well-known popularly.

Two more covert types of lying are the exclusion of relevant information (what you call "taming") and the inclusion of irrelevant extraneous information (the side-shows with laughably stupid welding-type bursts of light).

It is no accident they can't make a simple statement about what the thing actualy does. It's pretty stupid when you're direct about it - running solar panels with a light bulb.

The vocabulary is deceptive and not even very sophisticated. How can it be with imaginary processes. Creating energy by running solar panels with light bulbs. Use Hoover Dam to power an elementary school.

All the sophomoric poof-making machinery is extraneous and also intentionally diversionary.

Entertaining. For me, anyway.
 
AlaskaBushPilot said:
It is no accident they can't make a simple statement about what the thing actualy does. It's pretty stupid when you're direct about it - running solar panels with a light bulb.
Click to expand...

All what I've read from them describes some small space and thingamajig getting heat and/or electricity from the outside, and when it reaches certain conditions an extremely short burst of energy in the form of radiation is gotten, with calculation giving a greater than one output/input ratio for that burst. Sometimes the burst lasts more but there are no figures about that ratio, which perfectly could have dropped from 1,000 for some milliseconds to 1.001 for hours (that is, the same total output of attowatts, I suppose).

Burnt electrodes are shown as proof of the "power" of the stunt, when more likely their oxidation at high temperature is indeed the source of energy: light a pile of paper with a match, use higher temperatures to light tungsten electrodes (and olde Edison legacy lightbulb would burn in an explosion if there were oxygen instead of argon inside the bulb).

And the solar-panel speculation is laughable: the technical limit for cell is not that high and you'll need a bunch of panels covering a large area (at least tens of square metres) just to manage the so publicized 1,000 Kw generator that is soon to be boxed and shipped if some little last moment investments are made.

Soooo saaaaad ....
 
aleCcowaN said:
All what I've read from them describes some small space and thingamajig getting heat and/or electricity from the outside, and when it reaches certain conditions an extremely short burst of energy in the form of radiation is gotten, ......
Soooo saaaaad ....
Click to expand...

Probably the out put form the charges up Flux Capacitors. Available in junkyards full of crashed De Loreans, some times.
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
The whole idea of needing "a commercial power source" is a red herring anyway. Where are these "experiments" taking place? In a building either designed for experimentation or in a warehouse-type environment. That means that there almost certainly is 32/64A power already on-site, and 125A mains isn't exactly unusual - and could easily be installed for some of that $100m.
Click to expand...

Just to be clear, the power source is a couple (?) of common, commercial capacitors. They deliver very short bursts or pulses of power, in magnitude comparable to a hair drier. Most of that is current. Voltage is only 3V or thereabouts. The power release spike from hydrino formation lasts much longer than the input power pulse, and is of considerably greater magnitude.

Mark
 
markie said:
Just to be clear, the power source is a couple (?) of common, commercial capacitors. They deliver very short bursts or pulses of power, in magnitude comparable to a hair drier. Most of that is current. Voltage is only 3V or thereabouts. The power release spike from hydrino formation lasts much longer than the input power pulse, and is of considerably greater magnitude.

Mark
Click to expand...

I can do that with a sparkler. Short burst of energy to ignite the firework and then an extended period where it burns the fuel. Makes a pretty bright light too.

Is there any reason to think there's more here than a redox reaction, i.e. simple chemistry?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom