“This is what tolerance looks like at UC Berkeley”

Arrests were made. Well it's about bloody time these left-wing criminals are carted off to jail. If they can't act civilized, then put them in prison and throw away the keys.

Gee, that sounds like something that would sound right in place in Germany or Italy or Russia in the 1930's.....

I am now convinced you are not even a sincere conservative. You are somebody who has drunk the Trump Kool Aid,probably because you find him "Anti Establishment and Edgy "and your only political belief is Donald J. Trump. If Trump were to do a 180, and start spouting liberal dogma,you would swing right along with him.
 
Last edited:
It was reported that some of them were arrested and they were not students of the university. True, we can't know about all of them, but that's why I put my caveat. The university statement claimed they were outsiders.

Here's that article again:

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/02/01/us/milo-yiannopoulos-berkeley/

The only arrests mentioned in the article are those of attackers who attacked two Berkeley College Republicans. It is those attackers the story says are not affiliated with the University. How many attackers? We don't know. It could be as few as two, which would leave a sizeable number of possible university-affiliated attackers to produce the $100,000 in property damage to the University and a much larger amount of monetary damage throughout the city. Again, we don't know the affiliation of other attackers or Black Blocs. Yet, based on that article, you concluded the $100,000 in damage to the University was caused by people not affiliated with the University. Moreover, you concluded that at least most of the agitators came from the outside and started riots. You do this by equating the victim status of the University with the victim status of the College Republicans and therefore conclude that both sets of attackers and rabble-rousers must be the same group of people. That is quite a bit of strained logic.

The fact is, we have absolutely no idea if the monetary damage was caused by university-affiliated knuckleheads or not. Yet you concluded otherwise. Puppycow, I went to the doctor and told him it hurts when I lift my arm. He said, "Don't do that."
 
Argumemnon asked your for a source for this a couple of pages ago. I second his request.
Here he is telling an audience why he postponed his planned speech about pizzagate.

I imagine the purpose of this speech was to explain that pizzagate was fake news. Right? :rolleyes:

It's rather stunning that a lying conspiracy theorist such as Milo is held in such high esteem. Welcome to Trump alt-reality folks.

(Dangit, I was trumped by Resume)
 
Last edited:
Any evidence? In theory this is a forum for skeptics, so I'd like more than a link to a facebook post of some person I don't know.

This is one of the most fantastically weak citations I've ever seen on this forum, and that's no small feat.

Well maybe it will change your mind when I tell you that the original person who tweeted this said that it comes from "reliable sources" (multiple) and when challenged said that there was no way these sources could ever be named. :rolleyes:

You had me at "fantastical"

Everyone can look at the comments under the linked facebook post, where sources are provided as well as sources establishing a prior pattern where Milo outs students during his speeches.

The real question is though, why should anyone consider liberals allies? Leftists such as anarchists will take action to stop Milo outing undocumented students, successfully since his speech was cancelled because of it. Liberals on the other hand are the ones who stand there whining about Milo's freedom to out students being suppressed by those evil anarchists in black bloc outfit.

"I may not agree with outing undocumented people, but I'll defend your right to do so."
"I may not agree with genocide, but I'll defend your right to organize it".
"I may not agree with telling the SS officer where the local Jews are hiding, but I'll defend your right to tell him."
... aka why everyone hates liberals.
 
There's some interesting video from the incident. Especially informative was this segment where an NYU "professor" was upset at police for not protecting "anti-fascist" members from College Republicans debating them.



I just right-clicked and went to "Copy video URL at current time" and it seemed to work. The copied URL seemed to append something more like t=270 instead of start=270. YMMV.


Yeah, although I wanted it to work between YT tags.



At least using "?t=" doesn't barf, but it also doesn't start it at the right place.
 
Milo and the Rioters are both world class jerks,and deserve each other.

I don't get why so many people here who despise Trump here...and put me at the head of the line as a Trump Despiser...don't get that the crap like what happened in Berkeley HELPS Trump.
 
Everyone can look at the comments under the linked facebook post, where sources are provided as well as sources establishing a prior pattern where Milo outs students during his speeches.

The real question is though, why should anyone consider liberals allies? Leftists such as anarchists will take action to stop Milo outing undocumented students, successfully since his speech was cancelled because of it. Liberals on the other hand are the ones who stand there whining about Milo's freedom to out students being suppressed by those evil anarchists in black bloc outfit.

"I may not agree with outing undocumented people, but I'll defend your right to do so."
.

You got that on your iPhone from your Anarchist pal's facebook who took a screen shot of a Twiiter?

Lolz, sounds totally legit my man.

"I may not agree with fake news, but I will defend Anarchist's right to make it up because Fascist."

Get yer labels here!
 
Milo and the Rioters are both world class jerks,and deserve each other.

I don't get why so many people here who despise Trump here...and put me at the head of the line as a Trump Despiser...don't get that the crap like what happened in Berkeley HELPS Trump.

Why does Milo deserve the rioters? Milo has never been violent. As far as I know, he's never hurt anybody except perhaps for witty bitty feelings. Furthermore, Milo stands ready to debate anybody anytime about his views and the claims he has made. He allows antagonistic questions at his talks and responds in good faith (albeit with some snark).
 
Milo and the Rioters are both world class jerks,and deserve each other.

I don't get why so many people here who despise Trump here...and put me at the head of the line as a Trump Despiser...don't get that the crap like what happened in Berkeley HELPS Trump.

Don't suppose you'd care to support that claim with evidence?
 
Gee, that sounds like something that would sound right in place in Germany or Italy or Russia in the 1930's.....

I am now convinced you are not even a sincere conservative. You are somebody who has drunk the Trump Kool Aid,probably because you find him "Anti Establishment and Edgy "and your only political belief is Donald J. Trump. If Trump were to do a 180, and start spouting liberal dogma,you would swing right along with him.

Lol so ridiculous:

You do understand the rule of law?
Slings comes up with a statement of reality and he just couldn't possibly believe that people breaking the law should go to jail, oh my!
 
There's some interesting video from the incident. Especially informative was this segment where an NYU "professor" was upset at police for not protecting "anti-fascist" members from College Republicans debating them.



I just right-clicked and went to "Copy video URL at current time" and it seemed to work. The copied URL seemed to append something more like t=270 instead of start=270. YMMV.

I AM A PROFESSOR!

Thanks for the chuckle.
 
Why does Milo deserve the rioters? Milo has never been violent. As far as I know, he's never hurt anybody except perhaps for witty bitty feelings. Furthermore, Milo stands ready to debate anybody anytime about his views and the claims he has made. He allows antagonistic questions at his talks and responds in good faith (albeit with some snark).

Once again you're showing how the left is anti-speech, and the left here dutifully ignores it.
 
Everyone can look at the comments under the linked facebook post, where sources are provided as well as sources establishing a prior pattern where Milo outs students during his speeches.
I see not so much as one solitary source other than comments from random, anonymous bozos. This is the sort of data source that Trump is infamous for. "People say..."

If I'm overlooking something, by all means be more specific.
 
Once again you're showing how the left is anti-speech, and the left here dutifully ignores it.

I'll address it right now: I'm not anti-speech. I often disagree with Milo but I agree with him on a few points. Regardless, he's definitely a troll, but that doesn't mean that what he has to say isn't worth listening to, and I disagree with those who try to use intimidation and violence to silence him. Good or bad, let him talk and challenge what he says with more free speech. Fight ignorance with knowledge.

As usual, extremists love to silence their opposition, whether they be on the left or the right, and I oppose both.
 
Using your own tortured logic, it appears that you also believe in pizzagate. After all, you've been talking about it.
Yeah, discussing the metadata on a skeptics forum is exactly the same as having a planned speech dedicated to the topic.

Tortured logic?!? Indeed.
 

Back
Top Bottom