• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bowling Green Massacre

Yuppers?!! The article you posted said nothing about a planned attack in Bowling Green. The guys arrested in Bowling Green were trying to send weapons TO IRAQ. They weren't planning an attack within the US.

They were trying to provide weapons to attack US soldiers.
 
They were trying to provide weapons to attack US soldiers.

Which is vastly different than her claim about a massacre carried out in Bowling Green, KY which the press didn't cover.
 
Last edited:
They were trying to provide weapons to attack US soldiers.

Yes. Attack invading soldiers in wartime in the country those soldiers had invaded. Not civilians in the country that did the invading.

Trying to argue for the accuracy of her stupid and false "Bowling Green Massacre" comments when there was no massacre in Bowling Green and no plans to even commit a massacre in Bowling Green is even stupider and more false than the initial claim.

Because at least there's a chance she merely doesn't know any better, whereas we KNOW you have had the actual facts explained to you and yet you're still pretending like she was telling the truth.
 
Last edited:
Yuppers?!! The article you posted said nothing about a planned attack in Bowling Green. The guys arrested in Bowling Green were trying to send weapons TO IRAQ. They weren't planning an attack within the US.

I believe Dancing David was acknowledging that.
 
She wasn't even telling the truth about the press not covering the actual events. She lied about the whole thing and is now attempting to walk-back the mess as a mis-speak.
 
Last edited:
Which seems altogether different from being the masterminds of something known as the Bowling Green Massacre.

Oh indeed. I was just pointing out that the comment "They weren't planning an attack within the US." didn't mean that they weren't planning on attacking the US.
 
It's all the fault of the Press for reporting what she says and not what she is thinking.
 
Which is vastly different than her claim about a massacre carried out in Bowling Green, KY which the press didn't cover.
I suppose it's the same thing if you adopt Stalinist principles of jurisprudence. Here's part of a show trial transcript.
“Vishinsky: Does that mean against comrades Stalin, Voroshilov, Kaganovich? Was it your Center that organized the assassination of comrade Kirov? Was the murder of Sergey Mironovich Kirov organized by your Center or by some other organization?

“Zinoviev: Yes, by our Center.

“Vishinsky: You, Kamenev, Smirnov, Mrachkovsky and Ter-Vaganian belonged to this Center?

“Zinoviev: Yes.

“Vishinsky: That means that all of you organized the killing of comrade Kirov?

“Zinoviev: Yes.

“Vishinsky: So then all of you murdered comrade Kirov?

“Zinoviev: Yes.​
The Bowling Green Massacre is like the joint killing of Comrade Kirov by Zinoviev, Kamenev, Smirnov, Mrachkovsky and Ter-Vaganian. It happened "objectively" because plots by enemies of the people.
 
Last edited:
Trying to argue for the accuracy of her stupid and false "Bowling Green Massacre" comments when there was no massacre in Bowling Green and no plans to even commit a massacre in Bowling Green is even stupider and more false than the initial claim.

I'm not, and have never, argued that her comments were accurate. What I did, was point out that bonzombiekitty's post didn't mean that they weren't planning an attack on the US.

You are jumping into emotive false facts as fast as a.... kellyanne conway.
 
They were trying to provide weapons to attack US soldiers.

Yes. I know. I posted that earlier. That has nothing to do with a massacre, planned or carried out, in Bowling Greene, KY.

Conway claimed there was a massacre in Bowling Green, KY. There wasn't. Some people have tried to defend her statements as her meaning that two guys were arrested for planning one. They weren't.

There was no Bowling Green massacre. There was no planned Bowling Green massacre. Bowling Green has nothing to do with any massacre outside of getting its ass handed to it in some sports.
 
Oh indeed. I was just pointing out that the comment "They weren't planning an attack within the US." didn't mean that they weren't planning on attacking the US.

It does, however, mean that there was not only no such thing as a "Bowling Green Massacre", but there were not even any plans for a "Bowling Green Massacre", and so trying to defend for her making up the entirely fictional and utterly nonexistent "Bowling Green Massacre" by saying "but there was a plan to attack US troops in Iraq" is nothing more than unmitigated ********.
 
Oh indeed. I was just pointing out that the comment "They weren't planning an attack within the US." didn't mean that they weren't planning on attacking the US.

Was that "planned attack on the US" in Bowling Green? Did it involve a massacre in Bowling Green?

Because if your answer to either of those questions is "no", then you were merely providing a red herring to distract from the completely fictional nature of her claimed "Bowling Green Massacre".
 
It does, however, mean that there was not only no such thing as a "Bowling Green Massacre", but there were not even any plans for a "Bowling Green Massacre", and so trying to defend for her making up the entirely fictional and utterly nonexistent "Bowling Green Massacre" by saying "but there was a plan to attack US troops in Iraq" is nothing more than unmitigated ********.

Which I didn't do (thanks in advance for your apology... kellyanne).

I responded to
"They weren't planning an attack within the US."
with the clarification:
"They were planning an attack on the US. "
That's all.

You are reading waaaay to much into this and going off tilting at strawmen of your own imagination.

btw, when you respond to my comment:
"They were planning an attack on the US. "
with this:
"Attack invading soldiers in wartime in the country those soldiers had invaded."
Do you think that makes what they did, OK?
 
This massacre is nearly as tragic as the Bosnian sniper fire incident.
 
Oh indeed. I was just pointing out that the comment "They weren't planning an attack within the US." didn't mean that they weren't planning on attacking the US.

A mere point of technicality but is attacking a US soldier engaged in operations overseas considered an attack on the US?

It seems like what these guys were doing was the equivalent of the Americans who were supporting the IRA during the troubles? Would that be fair?
 

Back
Top Bottom