• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator

Status
Not open for further replies.
michaelsuede said:
BrLP just released a new video today of the SunCell operating above 3000° C in a commercial design. The camera attenuation was up to a factor of 10,560 times to avoid saturation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfGgHD8e9sM

Even small increments above 3000° C drastically increase the final power output of the generator because the spectrum shifts more to the right, allowing the TPV cells to harness more of the energy.
Click to expand...

Hmmm. Big numbers, technical jargon, and a video of something really bright, that may or may not be a result of ground breaking physics.

Why don't they just boil some *********** water? :confused:
 
JeanTate said:
Here in the ISF, we are just a few people, with some common interests and, no doubt, varied backgrounds, experiences, skills, university degrees, and so on. Especially those who have posted in this thread.

Yet if we accept what's in some of the sources ms has provided, at least some academic staff in at least one university physics (?) department provided some sort of endorsement or support for at least some aspect of the core idea (fractional quantum states, say). Though I should add that I didn't thoroughly check this, so I'd appreciate being told where I'm wrong.
Click to expand...



The key here is, most people in our society assume that "scientists" are all smart. At least above-average smart, if not genius level smart.

And by and large, scientists don't complain about that perception, because why would they? :D

But here's the thing: Science is just like like any other job. No one disputes that there are bad plumbers, bad mechanics, bad waiters, bad bartenders, bad bureaucrats, bad accountants, bad lawyers, you name it. And just as with every other job, there are just some bad scientists out there. People clever enough to remember what they need to pass a test, clever enough to follow the instructions in their lab book to get the expected result, but not quite clever enough to quite grasp the essence of science, what it means to expand on knowledge, rather than just replicate previous work.

I'm willing to bet everyone who ever went through a college or university science degree could tell you stories of people like that. I know I can.

And yet, those people still often graduate with a degree, and they get jobs. Not the greatest job, but every lab out there needs bottle washers. There's value in being able to follow directions, and carry out an established procedure, if for no other reason than it frees up better scientists to work on better things.

And I suspect Mills looks for people like that: smart enough to follow his instructions and "get the expected results", but not smart enough to question any of the inconsistencies in his narrative. Mills gets his "confirmation", they get a better paying job, and everyone (other than his investors) goes home happy.
 
aleCcowaN said:
Also ... the shiny light (that is, the burning bush) ... never an image of an instrument measuring an output.
Click to expand...

I'm not a scientist, (but I am shiny) and even I thought of that. Why quote temperature and not at least show the reading on a gauge? Why show us ninety seconds of nothing? How gullible are the people who have given this guy 10's of millions of dollars?
 
Shiner said:
How gullible are the people who have given this guy 10's of millions of dollars?
Click to expand...

If you have a fishing net large enough and fine enough, you can probably catch minnows up to 10's of millions of dollars.

But if you want to catch thousands of millions you should fish for dumbus maioris which are much rare. They live in abyssal zones, and when you take them into the air, they explode.

That doesn't prevent michaelsuede for trying to catch something here. The video doesn't say the temperature is 3000°C. It's michaelsuede the one who asserted that BS in a yes-chalant, kinda I-was-there style.
 
aleCcowaN said:
. The video doesn't say the temperature is 3000°C. It's michaelsuede the one who asserted that BS in a yes-chalant, kinda I-was-there style.
Click to expand...

You're right, the blurb with the video says it's capable of 3000°, not that it achieves it in the video. I think ms just slightly reworded what was written there.

I do get the feeling that he implies inside knowledge, but am starting to think it's bluster.
 
Captain_Swoop said:
3000 degrees.
What's it made of?
Click to expand...

On the diagram I saw, I can identify a lithium ion battery. This will require mutiple layers of unobtainium insulation to protect it, I'm thinking.

I'd like to know what role the radiator plays, and how on earth it's supposed to fuction in that environment.
 
aleCcowaN said:
Could you be more specific about where is that support supposed to be?

Of four "endorsements" provided in the OP I take the time to skim through one of them looking for elements to further analyse and I found what I've already commented:

  • published in Mills' website
  • weirdly laid out -seems it was edited in haste-
  • author's field of expertise not related with the core of Mills' work
  • noticeable omissions, like who provided the samples and details about their preparation
  • size of samples so small that the effect that was supposedly measured was in the same order of the instrumental error margin for the whole time frame of the experiment
  • that instrumental error margin is not shown nor discussed
  • lack of any declaration of interest or lack thereof (so it was just BrLP works and nothing else)
  • a mute author (the author, like other authors in that list and other lists, only speaks on the subject in that paper and nowhere else, so they seem to be legally gagged to keep their mouth shut)
  • in the only place the author speaks -the "paper"- he says "I saw something".
Click to expand...
What I had most in mind, when I wrote that post, was the four sources ms provides in the OP, "Rowan University's report", ... I'll go through this, and the documents, in more detail later.

At least three of the four seem quite unambiguous about the role of "hydrinos", at the very least as a central component or feature. While not all of those who (seem to) have signed are physics professors - and one does not give his affiliation as a university (he is - head of? - a consulting company) - it'd be astonishing if they all are ignorant of how revolutionary fractional quantum states would be (or could be).
 
JeanTate said:
What I had most in mind, when I wrote that post, was the four sources ms provides in the OP, "Rowan University's report", ... I'll go through this, and the documents, in more detail later.

At least three of the four seem quite unambiguous about the role of "hydrinos", at the very least as a central component or feature. While not all of those who (seem to) have signed are physics professors - and one does not give his affiliation as a university (he is - head of? - a consulting company) - it'd be astonishing if they all are ignorant of how revolutionary fractional quantum states would be (or could be).
Click to expand...

To complete the picture, be sure to take a look at this video

 
I mean hell, 3000°C isn't really that impressive anyway, lightbulb filaments are usually around 2500°C but can easily reach that temperature. Halogen light's normal operating temp is 3000°C
 
Last edited:
michaelsuede said:
Graphite black body radiator. Electrodes are streams of molten silver.
Click to expand...

It's clearly a scam (hard to believe you haven't realised that yet :rolleyes:). No laboratory experience gets a video with bright light and noise in it unless you're aiming to get just that. The noise is mandatory when conveying the notion of "powerful" is needed. Was the noise reduced by a 10,560 factor too or was it amplified those many times to that effect?

"Graphite black body radiator. Electrodes are streams of molten silver"

That is the kind of answer prepared for morons that are at a stand in a fair looking to something they can't get their heads around. But, wait a minute! silver vaporizes at 1950°C [please, educated posters, don't warn michaelsuede about his other blunder regarding this silver thing]. Are you posting here so you can get this kind of answers and prepare the script for morons to come? It's hard to imagine your interest here being different than that.

Besides the moral implication of all this advocacy, that video boils down to more hand-waving and "look investors: we managed to get your millions into some hot, shiny and noisy thingy" :hypnotize **applause**
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom