abaddon
Penultimate Amazing
But -have you seen one full of eels?
I've heard of one. Does that count?
But -have you seen one full of eels?
I fully agree with Dave... Neither of us is telepathic.
Well, Michel's claim is that we we all hear his thoughts. If we all deny that we do, he claims we are lying about it.Another thing that EVERY SINGLE PERSON in this thread has in common.
....... along with everyone else on the planet.
HovercraftsHow on on earth does he know in the first place that we hear his thoughts?
Well, Michel's claim is that we we all hear his thoughts. If we all deny that we do, he claims we are lying about it.
Yes.... That was the point of my post. I don't interject a declaration that no-one is telepathic into conversation at random you know.![]()
No, but we all know that's what you were thinking.
Dave
Budum tish!
I think that my real motivation for doing all these extra-sensory tests is to try to achieve a better acceptance and recognition of my real telepathic property, by all if possible.From what I can tell, he isn't doing these "tests" to actually demonstrate he has telepathy. He is doing them because he hopes that good results will quiet the disturbing voices in his head. ...
I am hearing Michel H's thoughts. ...
... I do indeed have ESP, and know for a fact that he wrote 2!
And you fail every time. Why?I think that my real motivation for doing all these extra-sensory tests is to try to achieve a better acceptance and recognition of my real telepathic property, by all if possible.
Those are imaginary.This seems desirable to me for good Science, and, ideally, it might allow to tackle more honestly and efficiently my problem of nasty voices and persecution (though this seems really still very far off as of now).
Of course not. You want to cling to the delusion at all costs. The fact remains that nobody hears your thoughts.I am not much impressed by the noise of people who say that telepathy does not exist, and that I am just a mentally ill, nothing else, because I think I have understood how dishonest people can sometimes be, particularly in a group.
It seems to me that you are now beginning to contradict yourself, like some previous posters in these telepathy threads:... You want to cling to the delusion at all costs. The fact remains that nobody hears your thoughts.
It is wrong to assume that results of telepathy tests should be completely obvious, a common mistake made by skeptics (in my opinion). Some work of interpretation is necessary, as I have tried to explain.Well, Michel's claim is that we we all hear his thoughts. If we all deny that we do, he claims we are lying about it.
How on on earth does he know in the first place that we hear his thoughts?
...
Congratulations on once again proving telepathy.
...
Bravo. I salute you.
...
You are the vanguard of the next Golden Age of psychic testing.
If you are ever invited to speak at a conference for psychic powers and phenomena, will you post the dates on this board? I really want to be there when you say, "OK, all you remote viewing folks and precognition folks - I want to say that you've got nothing; so quit wasting our time with something that has no possible mechanism. Now, I'd like to speak about my unimpeachable ESP evidence."
...
Michel H said:…I am not much impressed by the noise of people who say that telepathy does not exist, and that I am just a mentally ill, nothing else, because I think I have understood how dishonest people can sometimes be, particularly in a group.
I am hearing Michel H's thoughts. ...... I do indeed have ESP, and know for a fact that he wrote 2!
You really don't understand sarcasm, Michel.
I think that my real motivation for doing all these extra-sensory tests is to try to achieve a better acceptance and recognition of my real telepathic property, by all if possible.
As you admit, it is you hearing voices in your head and suffering a persecution complex. We don't hear these voices at all. You are attempting to project your illness on to us.it might allow to tackle more honestly and efficiently my problem of nasty voices and persecution
And you would be plain flat out wrong. I have not contradicted myself, I pointed out yet another flaw in your wild claims. If you happen to randomly get a hit, you take that as proof of your telepathy. If you get a reply that you can warp into a hit with eye-watering results, you take that as proof of your telepathy. If you get a response which you cannot warp into a hit, you don't take it as a miss, you take it as proof the we heard you telepathically but lie about it, in other words another hit.It seems to me that you are now beginning to contradict yourself, like some previous posters in these telepathy threads:... You want to cling to the delusion at all costs. The fact remains that nobody hears your thoughts.
Well, Michel's claim is that we we all hear his thoughts. If we all deny that we do, he claims we are lying about it.
How on on earth does he know in the first place that we hear his thoughts?
You claim the exact opposite. You claim that everyone worldwide hears your thoughts clearly and obviously and then lies about it. Are you now changing your claim? Of course you are. Having painted yourself into a corner, you now have to fudge pretty much everything in order to prop up your delusion that we all hear your thoughts.It is wrong to assume that results of telepathy tests should be completely obvious, a common mistake made by skeptics (in my opinion). Some work of interpretation is necessary, as I have tried to explain.
And I bet you don't need a microwave oven with all that radiation pouring out of your brain....
Congratulations on once again proving telepathy.
...
Bravo. I salute you.
...
You are the vanguard of the next Golden Age of psychic testing.
If you are ever invited to speak at a conference for psychic powers and phenomena, will you post the dates on this board? I really want to be there when you say, "OK, all you remote viewing folks and precognition folks - I want to say that you've got nothing; so quit wasting our time with something that has no possible mechanism. Now, I'd like to speak about my unimpeachable ESP evidence."
...
It seems to me that you are now beginning to contradict yourself, like some previous posters in these telepathy threads:
It is wrong to assume that results of telepathy tests should be completely obvious, a common mistake made by skeptics (in my opinion). Some work of interpretation is necessary, as I have tried to explain.
This is why you don't say these things to people that are most likely suffering mental health issues. Even if they understand sarcasm, they will ignore it the way they suspend other rational thoughts in order to make their delusions fit.
Anyone planning to post anything, please reread this first. Anything you post, however clear you think you are being, will be twisted to fit Michel's delusion.