Are all Trump supporters racists?

[varwoche]

... The free press has been less than truthful, I do enjoy Bill O'Reilly though. Seems like O'Reilly is the only no spin outlet available these days. I guess that's why his show rates as #1 out of all cable news. Fox is certainly to the Right and CNN on the Left.
I like Bill though, he calls it like it is whether you like it or not. Chris B.

So, if I point you to O'Reilly challenging Trump regarding Trump propagating lies emanating from a neo-nazi source, will you finally acknowledge that Trump propagated lies emanating from a neo-nazi source? And that he failed to retract?

Spoon-feeding facts to you for the last time, enjoy your bubble.

 

[Resume]

I like Bill though, he calls it like it is whether you like it or not. Chris B.

Tide goes in, tide goes out. Can't explain that.

Well, he can't explain it. He called it all right.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

So, if I point you to O'Reilly challenging Trump regarding Trump propagating lies emanating from a neo-nazi source, will you finally acknowledge that Trump propagated lies emanating from a neo-nazi source? And that he failed to retract?

Spoon-feeding facts to you for the last time, enjoy your bubble.

I know about the retweets. I know Trump admitted it was a mistake and he now was correcting the tendency to retweet things. Was that all you had for me?
I watched the interview,my favorite part: “Bill, am I gonna check every statistic?” he asked Fox News host Bill O’Reilly at the time. “All it was is a retweet. It wasn’t from me.” Trump.

Is the retweet issue the only issue you have with Trump?

Chris B.

 

[uke2se]

I know about the retweets. I know Trump admitted it was a mistake and he now was correcting the tendency to retweet things. Was that all you had for me?
I watched the interview,my favorite part: “Bill, am I gonna check every statistic?” he asked Fox News host Bill O’Reilly at the time. “All it was is a retweet. It wasn’t from me.” Trump.

Is the retweet issue the only issue you have with Trump?

Chris B.

It's a pretty ******* big issue, but not the only one.

It's a big issue because this is the person who has designs on leading the US and thus being the most powerful person on Earth. Everything he says is important, and will be weighed and measured, by a domestic audience, but more importantly, by an international one, including politicians. If Trump is careless enough to retweet a white nationalist not once, but twice, despite being called on it the first time, he's unfit for presidency.

We're also talking about retweeting bogus statistics. There is really only reason for Trump to do this, if we discount the possibility that he did it despite knowing they were false. Trump retweeted this because it rhymes with what he believes.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

By showing what actually happened. What evidence do you have that WaPo and NYT made up the story?



Most of the press coverage about Trump is very honest. Too honest for Trump's thin skin.



Are you being intentionally dishonest or do you really not understand that when I ask for evidence that a newspaper lied, asserting that a tv network lied doesn't cut it?

OK, Easy peasy.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/trump-girlfriend-new-york-times-lied/2016/05/16/id/728981/
The hit piece the NYT did on Trump that featured Rowanne Brewer Lane.

From a fox and friends interview:
"They promised several times that they would do it accurately. They told me several times and my manager several times that it would not be a hit piece and that my story would come across the way that I was telling it and honestly, and it absolutely was not."

"She said the newspaper used her quotes but "put a negative connotation on it. They spun it where it appeared negative."

"I did not have a negative experience with Donald Trump, and I don't appreciate them making it look like I was saying that it was a negative experience, because it was not," she said on Fox.

Next. Chris B.

 

[varwoche]

I know about the retweets. I know Trump admitted it was a mistake and he now was correcting the tendency to retweet things. Was that all you had for me?
I watched the interview,my favorite part: “Bill, am I gonna check every statistic?” he asked Fox News host Bill O’Reilly at the time. “All it was is a retweet. It wasn’t from me.” Trump.

Evidence?

Is the retweet issue the only issue you have with Trump?

Hardly. But given how time consuming it was to get you to almost acknowledge this one fact, I surrender to your impermeability.

 

[uke2se]

OK, Easy peasy.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/trump-girlfriend-new-york-times-lied/2016/05/16/id/728981/
The hit piece the NYT did on Trump that featured Rowanne Brewer Lane.

From a fox and friends interview:
"They promised several times that they would do it accurately. They told me several times and my manager several times that it would not be a hit piece and that my story would come across the way that I was telling it and honestly, and it absolutely was not."

"She said the newspaper used her quotes but "put a negative connotation on it. They spun it where it appeared negative."

"I did not have a negative experience with Donald Trump, and I don't appreciate them making it look like I was saying that it was a negative experience, because it was not," she said on Fox.

Next. Chris B.

Quote the lie, please.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

It's a pretty ******* big issue, but not the only one.

It's a big issue because this is the person who has designs on leading the US and thus being the most powerful person on Earth. Everything he says is important, and will be weighed and measured, by a domestic audience, but more importantly, by an international one, including politicians. If Trump is careless enough to retweet a white nationalist not once, but twice, despite being called on it the first time, he's unfit for presidency.

We're also talking about retweeting bogus statistics. There is really only reason for Trump to do this, if we discount the possibility that he did it despite knowing they were false. Trump retweeted this because it rhymes with what he believes.

This is a non-issue. He retweeted some false crap and was called on it. Sure it may have destroyed any other Republican candidate, but Trump was not a politician so the political correctness rules don't apply.

Trump is definitely NOT PC. That's part of what got him elected. Throw the political strategy book away, nothing worked on Trump and they threw the book at him. Nothing worked. Think about why that was and you'll begin to understand where the Country is now. Chris B.

 

[logger]

If Trump is careless enough to retweet a white nationalist not once, but twice, despite being called on it the first time, he's unfit for presidency.

.

That is the most desperate post I've seen all day. Good thing you don't set laws.

 

[uke2se]

This is a non-issue. He retweeted some false crap and was called on it. Sure it may have destroyed any other Republican candidate, but Trump was not a politician so the political correctness rules don't apply.

Look, I know facts and reality isn't really your playground, but could you try to define what you mean by politician? I'm having a hard time understanding how Trump isn't one, given that what he has been doing, at least since he announced his candidacy, is playing politics.

Trump is definitely NOT PC. That's part of what got him elected.

I agree. Because, for some reason, some people apparently need to be able to say racist and sexist things to make other people feel bad. I can't understand it myself.

Throw the political strategy book away, nothing worked on Trump and they threw the book at him. Nothing worked. Think about why that was and you'll begin to understand where the Country is now. Chris B.

It's in the crapper, that's where it is, and the big flush is coming January 20th. It's down the drains from there on out.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

Quote the lie, please.

The entire article is a hit piece. As evidenced by Rowanne Brewer Lane, the woman interviewed. What else do you require? Can you provide proof she is lying? Chris B.

 

[kookbreaker]

This is a non-issue. He retweeted some false crap and was called on it. Sure it may have destroyed any other Republican candidate, but Trump was not a politician so the political correctness rules don't apply.

It is a sad and sickening world that you want where *not* tweeting vile, white supremacists' lies is considered "politically correct" rather than 'basic decent human behavior'.

 

[uke2se]

The entire article is a hit piece. As evidenced by Rowanne Brewer Lane, the woman interviewed. What else do you require? Can you provide proof she is lying? Chris B.

That's not the point. She says she feels that the newspaper took her quotes and put a spin on them. The newspaper says she was quoted fairly. Other people appearing in the same article say they were quoted fairly.

You claim they lied. Now quote the lie, or retract your claim.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

Look, I know facts and reality isn't really your playground, but could you try to define what you mean by politician? I'm having a hard time understanding how Trump isn't one, given that what he has been doing, at least since he announced his candidacy, is playing politics.



I agree. Because, for some reason, some people apparently need to be able to say racist and sexist things to make other people feel bad. I can't understand it myself.



It's in the crapper, that's where it is, and the big flush is coming January 20th. It's down the drains from there on out.

It's ok that you don't get Trump. There's no need to support him. Many of the Republicans did not support Trump or Obama in 2008 or 2012. It's healthy to disagree.

We had an election, Trump won fair and square. He'll only be around 8 years at the most and 4 at the least. Everything will be alright and it's not the end of the World. Chris B.

 

[ponderingturtle]

It's ok that you don't get Trump. There's no need to support him. Many of the Republicans did not support Trump or Obama in 2008 or 2012. It's healthy to disagree.

We had an election, Trump won fair and square. He'll only be around 8 years at the most and 4 at the least. Everything will be alright and it's not the end of the World. Chris B.

Unless he gets offended and nukes Iran that might well be the end of the world.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

That's not the point. She says she feels that the newspaper took her quotes and put a spin on them. The newspaper says she was quoted fairly. Other people appearing in the same article say they were quoted fairly.

You claim they lied. Now quote the lie, or retract your claim.

I am convinced by her testimony, the article is a hit piece designed to hurt Donald Trump. Spinning it to suit that purpose. By definition the entire piece is a lie as it portrays something to be sexist that was clearly not as is claimed by the subject interviewed.

This treatment of Trump by the press actually helped him though. Isn't that ironic?
Chris B.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

It is a sad and sickening world that you want where *not* tweeting vile, white supremacists' lies is considered "politically correct" rather than 'basic decent human behavior'.

I looked into the re-Tweet issue in detail. To me it was innocent enough. Donald Trump's repeated disavowal of the White supremies says much more about him than these re-tweets. I'm not into making mountains out of mole hills. Chris B.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

Evidence?

Hardly. But given how time consuming it was to get you to almost acknowledge this one fact, I surrender to your impermeability.

He's talked about the re-tweets several times in different interviews on Fox. I think he also talked about the re-tweets during the Kelly interview as well.

You did notice that once he was called on the re-tweets, he stopped doing that. Was re-tweeting those 2 things a mistake? Obviously as it gave ammo to the folks claiming Trump was a racist with connections to White supremies.

It did force him to disavow such people and activities though, which was a good thing. Chris B.

 

[varwoche]

He's talked about the re-tweets several times in different interviews on Fox. I think he also talked about the re-tweets during the Kelly interview as well.

Your unsupported comments don't qualify as credible evidence by any stretch of the imagination.

You did notice that once he was called on the re-tweets, he stopped doing that.

No. But even if you're right, that doesn't qualify as a retraction by any stretch of the imagination. The turd remains in the punch bowl.

 

[ponderingturtle]

I looked into the re-Tweet issue in detail. To me it was innocent enough. Donald Trump's repeated disavowal of the White supremies says much more about him than these re-tweets. I'm not into making mountains out of mole hills. Chris B.

Yet he clearly isn't as against them to anywhere near the extent he will express his views about a negative review of one of his restaurants. He only disavows them when called on it.