Are all Trump supporters racists?

A personal conflict with one man does not a denigrator make. He doesn't get along with McCain so what. Lets see what happens for Veterans in this Country. I didn't see Hillary having any benefit to raise money for Veteran's Groups.....Did you? Chris B.

"I like people who weren't caught"

It wasn't just about McCain and you know it. Stop lying. Both to us and yourself.
 
LOL spoken like the perfect Leftist, they could not ask for a better follower.

I'm not a leftist. I vote center-right.

What if, and this is just a thought, but what if someone wrote something that was untrue about a political candidate? Possible? LMAO
Chris B.

Yep. That's not the case here though. Unless you have evidence that the newspapers in question were lying. Tall order.
 
1) Because he's a racist.

2) Because he's a moron.

I've said this a few times now - Trump did not campaign to win over black people, or any other non-white group, ever. He campaigned as an obvious attempt to convince prejudiced white people that he's not a racist, the people who whine that black people are "the real racists" when they point out racial discrimination, and the resulting disparities in wealth, education, unemployment, and so forth.

If you want to see what campaigning for minority votes actually looks like, one need look no further than Hillary Clinton - actual discussion of issues that affect them, including police violence, aid for starting small businesses, and so forth, addressed and stated directly to nonwhite, non-christian groups.

So are you going to address the fact that trump gets his information from racist sources or just going to ignore that after it has been shown to be unambiguously true?

Trump does consider @whitegenocideTM to be a reputable source. That is why he retweeted it and why he later defended it as being true because it was on the internet.

As a matter of fact, the entire "white Genocide" thing refers to the idea that there's some conspiracy to move nonwhite people into white countries (ironically including North America the fact that Europeans are themselves an immigrant group goes over their heads) in order to breed with white women, and thus somehow "destroy" the "white race". Note the assumption that whiteness can be tainted by nonwhite DNA, but not the other way around. Standard white supremacist crap.
 
Simple facts? You mean facts from the Left that are not researched and are to be taken for granted? I don't follow those.

If you have some evidence to provide for me to consider please by all means, but don't link a New York Times or Washington Post piece and reference as "fact". Chris B.
Ya sure.

 
That isn't the only time trump retweeted @whitegenocideTM

That is where he got his numbers for this claim.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/nov/23/donald-trump/trump-tweet-blacks-white-homicide-victims/

Again a retweet, Trump had said in a interview on Fox that he was getting into trouble on some of the retweets and he stopped doing those. Easy peasy, done deal.

I think retweeting some random tweet you like is innocent enough but evidently not, so he stopped doing those. Should he have retweeted those without fact checking them? Obviously not but we're talking about a non-politician. So perhaps he didn't know any better.

If you can't forgive a few mistakes then the candidate for you would be Jesus.
Chris B.
 
"I like people who weren't caught"

It wasn't just about McCain and you know it. Stop lying. Both to us and yourself.

So in your version his statement had nothing to do with McCain and was an attack on Veterans? Oh, that's making me dizzy.......Chris B.
 
I'm not a leftist. I vote center-right.



Yep. That's not the case here though. Unless you have evidence that the newspapers in question were lying. Tall order.

Congratulations.



Evidence of tampering with the press exists in the Wikileaks emails. Have you bothered to read any of those? I liked the ones that had writers having their articles looked at by Clinton staffers prior to publication.

Oh and CNN staff giving the debate questions to Hillary in advance. Thank you Donna!

One of the funniest moments was when the CNN reporter got caught on camera coaching an undecided voter in their "focus group" on what to say for the camera word for word....Hilarious!

Chris B.
 
Again a retweet, Trump had said in a interview on Fox that he was getting into trouble on some of the retweets and he stopped doing those. Easy peasy, done deal.

And citing them and defending their lies is clearly not a big deal for you and other trump supporters. So what if he was citing white supremecists when he said 81% of white murder victims are killed by blacks. No one could possibly believe any thing he ever says in the first place, so why would they believe that?
 
Again a retweet, Trump had said in a interview on Fox that he was getting into trouble on some of the retweets and he stopped doing those. Easy peasy, done deal.

I think retweeting some random tweet you like is innocent enough but evidently not, so he stopped doing those. Should he have retweeted those without fact checking them? Obviously not but we're talking about a non-politician. So perhaps he didn't know any better.

If you can't forgive a few mistakes then the candidate for you would be Jesus.
Chris B.

Retweets a white supremacist not once, but twice, but it's no big deal. He's not a politician after all. He's just a candidate for the Presidency of the US.

No big deal, amirite?
 
Congratulations.



Evidence of tampering with the press exists in the Wikileaks emails. Have you bothered to read any of those? I liked the ones that had writers having their articles looked at by Clinton staffers prior to publication.

Oh and CNN staff giving the debate questions to Hillary in advance. Thank you Donna!

One of the funniest moments was when the CNN reporter got caught on camera coaching an undecided voter in their "focus group" on what to say for the camera word for word....Hilarious!

Chris B.

Goal-posts are all over the place. I ask you for evidence that the WaPo and NY-Times lied, and you start waffling about CNN.

Are you sure you think before you post?
 
So you know what the Washington Post writes, I'll bet you also know what the New York Times writes, but do you know the truth or what that is? Funny the story you link to uses fact checks from the Washington Post........I suppose you believe everything you read about Trump as long as it's negative coverage.

A little fact checking of your own would serve the truth better. I thought you guys claim to be skeptics? I'm not seeing it. Chris B.

Your devotion is strong, young Padawan.

That article links to the WSJ article when the documentation was first uncovered. You know, that uber left wing journal owned by Rupert Murdoch?

I believe what I read about Trump that is borne out by the evidence. Your source of information? Trump, himself? A proven pathological liar. His spokespersons? Godparents to The New Truth: Facts don't matter, it's what people believe that matters.

You're entitled to your faith. Just don't try to pass it of as factual.
 
Your devotion is strong, young Padawan.

That article links to the WSJ article when the documentation was first uncovered. You know, that uber left wing journal owned by Rupert Murdoch?
I believe what I read about Trump that is borne out by the evidence. Your source of information? Trump, himself? A proven pathological liar. His spokespersons? Godparents to The New Truth: Facts don't matter, it's what people believe that matters.

You're entitled to your faith. Just don't try to pass it of as factual.

This is what I love most about our new breed of ignorant trolls. They can't even keep straight what and who is actually liberal or conservative.

All they see is an argument that could be construed as "other" and POOF! Instant liberal.

Like those liberals McCain, McConnell and Graham who want in investigation into the most obvious thing about the election (Russian involvement)
 
Goal-posts are all over the place. I ask you for evidence that the WaPo and NY-Times lied, and you start waffling about CNN.

Are you sure you think before you post?

So, I'm supposed to do a homework assignment to prove the WP and NYT lies?
How does one disprove a made up story?

CNN is not another example of the dishonest campaign press coverage about Trump? They're not an example of a media outlet laying out the red carpet for the other side? Even though they gave Clinton the debate questions in advance? Really? LMAO! Thank you, this much entertainment shouldn't be free. Do those Leftist blinders interfere with your driving? Chris B.
 
So, I'm supposed to do a homework assignment to prove the WP and NYT lies?
How does one disprove a made up story?

CNN is not another example of the dishonest campaign press coverage about Trump? They're not an example of a media outlet laying out the red carpet for the other side? Even though they gave Clinton the debate questions in advance? Really? LMAO! Thank you, this much entertainment shouldn't be free. Do those Leftist blinders interfere with your driving? Chris B.

The word you are looking for is lügenpresse.
 
The word you are looking for is lügenpresse.

Well, I don't speak German, so it never occurred to me. But that's about right. The press lies and manipulates to promote a certain agenda. The free press has been less than truthful, I do enjoy Bill O'Reilly though. Seems like O'Reilly is the only no spin outlet available these days. I guess that's why his show rates as #1 out of all cable news. Fox is certainly to the Right and CNN on the Left.
I like Bill though, he calls it like it is whether you like it or not. Chris B.
 
It helps to inherit it like trump did. If he had the net worth he inherited in a mutual fund pegged to the dow he would be worth 10 billion. So any amount less than that can be deducted as being less than 0 increase.

Trump is a great example of how if you are born into wealth, you can get rich no matter how competent or incompetent you are.

I would say he is the epitome of "privilege" in the US, except that his kids are moreso.

You really think the younger Trumpians are brilliant business minds? Or do they just been given a silver spoon?
 
So, I'm supposed to do a homework assignment to prove the WP and NYT lies?
How does one disprove a made up story?

By showing what actually happened. What evidence do you have that WaPo and NYT made up the story?

CNN is not another example of the dishonest campaign press coverage about Trump?

Most of the press coverage about Trump is very honest. Too honest for Trump's thin skin.

They're not an example of a media outlet laying out the red carpet for the other side?

Are you being intentionally dishonest or do you really not understand that when I ask for evidence that a newspaper lied, asserting that a tv network lied doesn't cut it?
 
Well, I don't speak German, so it never occurred to me. But that's about right. The press lies and manipulates to promote a certain agenda. The free press has been less than truthful, I do enjoy Bill O'Reilly though. Seems like O'Reilly is the only no spin outlet available these days. I guess that's why his show rates as #1 out of all cable news. Fox is certainly to the Right and CNN on the Left.
I like Bill though, he calls it like it is whether you like it or not. Chris B.

And conveniently enough, he always calls it as you see it.

Wonder why you like him.
 

Back
Top Bottom