• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

RIP Castro

I don't joke with leftists, its rather painful to do so.

If you think Papa Doc is the same as a republican or conservative republican, I won't waste anymore time. ;)
If I said he was the same as a Republican, you will show me where I stated that. I stated that limited government doesn't preclude even the most outrageous despotism. And that Duvalier was an exponent of both principles. But you are simply retreating from a discussion in which your arguments have been exploded. Which is your sacred right.

You say that Trump simply can't follow his own criminal predispositions when he is president of the USA.

I think you are right. What will stop him? Democratic government - not the absence of government - will stop him. As it limited his activities in Scotland once the First Minister realised he had been stung big time, and stopped crawling up Trump's arse.
 
Careful, folks. We're going to get another thread split and an AAH dump if we're not careful. :(
 
Genuinely can't tell if serious. You are joking right?

You may have missed this but the UK itself and UK territory has either been invaded or the attempt repelled twice since 1939 by dictators and the US didn't help either time. Is it that you keep the world free unless you think you can make money from it? You'll need to clarify your interesting world view because it's not marrying up with actual world events at the moment.
 
You may have missed this but the UK itself and UK territory has either been invaded or the attempt repelled twice since 1939 by dictators and the US didn't help either time. Is it that you keep the world free unless you thinkv you can make money from it? You'll need to clarify your interesting world view because it's not marrying up with actual world events at the moment.

:confused:
 

Battle of Britain prevented the German invasion in 1940 and we retook the Falklands after the Argentine invasion in 1982. The US did not assist with either.

Both Hitler and Galtieri are pretty much textbook dictators last time I checked.

Eta: quoted the wrong post in my last reply. I was replying to this
Most who believe in freedom would agree with my post. That doesn't include the extreme left, socialists and communists. They are usually regarded as the enemy that needs to be defeated.
 
Last edited:
Battle of Britain prevented the German invasion in 1940
True. But equally, Britain had no means to open a European front without US assistance (and, to be fair, vice versa).
[/QUOTE]

we retook the Falklands after the Argentine invasion in 1982. The US did not assist with either.
"Margaret Thatcher would have lost the Falklands war in 1982 if America had failed to provide crucial missiles to bolster British air defences, according to an adviser to the former prime minister."

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/sep/06/falklands.world
 
Battle of Britain prevented the German invasion in 1940 and we retook the Falklands after the Argentine invasion in 1982. The US did not assist with either.

Both Hitler and Galtieri are pretty much textbook dictators last time I checked.

Eta: quoted the wrong post in my last reply. I was replying to this

While the Battle of Britain was an awesome victory of British aviation against Germany, it was a tactical success that required international assistance to follow through to strategic victory. I'm not positive, I'll have to look it up in Wikipedia, but I seem to recall the US helped a bit.

And I'm pretty sure the US helped the UK with new weapons after the British dropped rifles and ran from Dunkirk, a retreat strangely considered a "victory" of some form.
 
True. But equally, Britain had no means to open a European front without US assistance (and, to be fair, vice versa).



"Margaret Thatcher would have lost the Falklands war in 1982 if America had failed to provide crucial missiles to bolster British air defences, according to an adviser to the former prime minister."

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/sep/06/falklands.world

I never said the US didn't assist in WW2. I said you didn't assist when we were about to be invaded by a dictator. This would be the thing that could never happen according to Logger.

With regards to the Falklands those missiles were free were they? I don't think selling arms was what Logger had in mind when he was beating his chest about how no dictator could ever invade a country whilst the US is about. Also by that metric France must have been allies with the Argentinians as they'd supplied them with the Exocets that caused us so much trouble.

Im not even knocking the US that much to be fair. As a country you don't like to get involved if there's nothing in it for you and that's fine. I just find Loggers view that the US is incapable of sitting on its hands when dictators cause trouble around the world laughable. Although it's less funny when you realise how many people seem to believe it.
 
Last edited:
Has another latin american dictator turned tits up? Well la de da, Buffalo Bob.

Wake me when it's the last one.
 
Im not even knocking the US that much to be fair. As a country you don't like to get involved if there's nothing in it for you and that's fine. I just find Loggers view that the US is incapable of sitting on its hands when dictators cause trouble around the world laughable. Although it's less funny when you realise how many people seem to believe it.

I'm sure when the dictators come to take over your island we'll be there once again to save your ass. We can't be there for every little skirmish.
 
That should have been your first clue that it wasn't Obama.
Obama was responsible for the auto bailout. You can't even get the clues right.

No, that's why I never vote conservative. Your education obviously didn't include dictionary usage.

Yours obviously included insults, too bad they didn't teach you insulting is when your losing. ;)


It doesn't surprise me you are happy with a lying, racist, misogynistic, billionaire playing you for a fool and bringing in his friends to help him fleece you but I don't think you "won" anything even though your candidate got in.
I'll remind you then of how much we're winning.
We have the presidency, both houses, the court, the vast majority of state houses and governorships. You've been beaten so badly and you're in complete denial.

Thanks for giving me the best laugh of the day. Its a wonderful feeling when your side gets beaten so badly. ;)
 
Last edited:
I'm sure when the dictators come to take over your island we'll be there once again to save your ass. We can't be there for every little skirmish.

Apart from the only two times it's happened since the USA was founded when you didn't? Also what with the once again. You've never saved us from invasion once?
 
Dude, I really have no answer for this one.

Yes I know.

You realize where all this started? Craig B expects Trump to become a dictator. I told him it was impossible because being "right" in the US and/or conservative doesn't fit with being a dictator, not to mention our laws of checks and balances. And then you started in with yours. So, just to review, Trump isn't like Papa doc, Castro or any other dictator that has come about, further, the US left OWNS any similarities to dictators from the left or right dictators around the world.
This is all nonsense. But I stated that Trump probably would not become a dictator, and that is because of the presemce of government, not its absence. Where government is absent, democracy is absent, and what takes its place is big boss authoritarianism and corporate excess.

ETA Or military or police dictatorship.
 
Last edited:
Obama was responsible for the auto bailout. You can't even get the clues right.

Obama's power over the Bush administration is fascinating. Can you explain how he did this to us muggles?

wiki said:
December 19, 2008: President Bush approved a bailout plan and gave General Motors and Chrysler $13.4 billion in financing from TARP (Troubled Assets Relief Program) funds, as well as $4 billion to be "withdrawn later".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_Chapter_11_reorganization
 
Obama was responsible for the auto bailout. You can't even get the clues right.

You doubled down on your ignorance. Your hero, Bush the Lesser, did that. He also bailed out the banks. But like a good conservative, you wouldn't let the truth get in the way of your delusions.

Yours obviously included insults . . .

Certainly did. But then again, when someone is so ignorant as to assign a bailout to the wrong president, what other entertainment can one hope for.

I'll remind you then of how much we're winning.

Didn't Charlie Sheen brag about how much he was winning just before his career ended and he announced he had AIDS? Yeah, you're winning like that. :)

Can't wait for your next post!
 
You doubled down on your ignorance. Your hero, Bush the Lesser, did that. He also bailed out the banks. But like a good conservative, you wouldn't let the truth get in the way of your delusions.

Lol, you have no idea what you're talking about. I'm not surprised you haven't noticed Obama taking full credit for the auto bailout.

Here is a bit of history for you. ;)
http://prospect.org/article/unpopular-successful-auto-bailout


Certainly did. But then again, when someone is so ignorant as to assign a bailout to the wrong president, what other entertainment can one hope for.
What's ignorant is your doubling down on being completely wrong, its also quite hilarious.




Didn't Charlie Sheen brag about how much he was winning just before his career ended and he announced he had AIDS? Yeah, you're winning like that. :)

Can't wait for your next post!
No not really, interesting choice for an analogy. Lol


Its more like this.
We have the Presidency, the House, the Senate, the Supreme Court, the majority of governorships, the majority of state houses. Your side has exactly what? You've lost so bad and you don't even know it. That is extreme denial and I love it!!!
 
Lol, you have no idea what you're talking about. I'm not surprised you haven't noticed Obama taking full credit for the auto bailout.

Here is a bit of history for you. ;)
http://prospect.org/article/unpopular-successful-auto-bailout



What's ignorant is your doubling down on being completely wrong, its also quite hilarious.





No not really, interesting choice for an analogy. Lol


Its more like this.
We have the Presidency, the House, the Senate, the Supreme Court, the majority of governorships, the majority of state houses. Your side has exactly what? You've lost so bad and you don't even know it. That is extreme denial and I love it!!!


So, Bush didn't announce the $17 billion bailout in December of 2008?

http://www.politico.com/story/2008

The Obama administration held the automakers to the deal but other than being in power when the final payment was made, Bush bailed them out. Your ignorance is becoming embarrassing.

Bush started two wars and left taxpayers to pay for them under Obama. Bush bailed out the banks resulting in millions of American taxpayers losing their homes. Bush sent the U.S. into one of their worst resessions in history. Bush took a record surplus under Clinton and turned it into a record debt in less than two years.

Your bragging about Republican control of the White House, House, and Senate is rather premature if you look back in history. The results of that the last two times were disasterous.

My side has the knowledge that we didn't support a racist, misogynistic, bigot for the Presidency of the U.S., making us douchebags by association.

But I am Canadian and very happy about this. Everytime the U.S. elects a Republican president the U.S. becomes less competitive in areas of science, technology, and medicine. The last time Canada made up a lot of ground to become leaders in those areas. I think once Trump and tge good old boys return the U.S. to the 1600s, you will have fallen so far behind you will never catch up.
 

Back
Top Bottom