Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Argumemnon said:
Yeah, I really do. You think that the other side of "bad" is "great". You have a pathetic understanding of logic and reason.
Click to expand...

IT certainly pales against your astute sense of sarcasm.

Hillary is awesome! I have got to start calling her Madame President now, that is gonna be tough to remember.

Because that is what skeptics said about 736 times before the election!
 
Argumemnon said:
No, it wouldn't. It only would if the only possible explanation for the loss is that her campaign was bad. That was exactly what I was trying to explain to Dog, but so far neither of you seem to be able to grasp that.



Yeah but that runs counter to reality so we can discard it.
Click to expand...

No it means your opinion is wrong, your clue would be his very narrow path. He seems to have run a very good campaign, as he got many democrats to vote for him.
 
The Big Dog said:
IT certainly pales against your astute sense of sarcasm.
Click to expand...

My sense of sarcasm has no equal.

Hillary is awesome!
Click to expand...

No, she really isn't. But then, that has nothing to do with anything I've said, and you know it. You can stop pretending now.

logger said:
No it means your opinion is wrong, your clue would be his very narrow path. He seems to have run a very good campaign, as he got many democrats to vote for him.
Click to expand...

Only because you believe that the only reason a candidate can win is because they run a good campaign, which is obviously nonsense.
 
wareyin said:
Of course, the vast majority of the ways you chose to "show" that Clinton was a garbage candidate were simply not true (alcoholic ring a bell?)
Click to expand...

The vast majority? I have just been re-reading the Benghazi and Clinton Email threads.

Oh man, it was *********** glorious.
 
Argumemnon said:
Oh, I agree that the perception would be thus, but I'd like to remind you that reality is not a popularity contest. Pardoning someone doesn't make them a criminal unless they've already been convicted (and even then).
Click to expand...

Ahh, now you're not in reality.

Maybe Obama would see the ongoing investigation as picking on poor sick hillary. What do you think that would look like? Suppose they find some really awful things, how would that look? I'll tell you, its why she was rejected, people accuse her of being above the law, therefore, another reason she lost. ;)
 
Argumemnon said:
Only because you believe that the only reason a candidate can win is because they run a good campaign, which is obviously nonsense.
Click to expand...

Lol

No not really at all!
He clearly won on two issues, immigration, and trade.
Hillary being a corrupt rat certainly didn't hurt.

Dude, you're the one claiming Trump ran a terrible campaign and yet he cleared some amazing hurdles. You move goal post like most leftists on here.
 
The Big Dog said:
I am blown away by the fact that the Shillaries seem unable to realize that they should be looking for what went wrong and desperately trying to fix it, but instead they appear to want to just call people "stupid"
Click to expand...

Its this place, lots of lost income has come about. :)
 
The Big Dog said:
The vast majority? I have just been re-reading the Benghazi and Clinton Email threads.

Oh man, it was *********** glorious.
Click to expand...

I was being generous. I honestly can't remember a single valid, true complaint from you, just nonstop throwing whatever you had against the wall to see what stuck.

Benghazi and Email, yeah, both times where Clinton was repeatedly accused, investigated, and there was nothing there. But The Big Dog just kept on repeating the big lie for Trump. Glorious
 
logger said:
Ahh, now you're not in reality.

Maybe Obama would see the ongoing investigation as picking on poor sick hillary. What do you think that would look like? Suppose they find some really awful things, how would that look? I'll tell you, its why she was rejected, people accuse her of being above the law, therefore, another reason she lost. ;)
Click to expand...

None of this addresses the fact that a pardon is not, in and of itself, an admission of guilt.

No not really at all!
Click to expand...

Then your previous post on the issue makes no sense at all.

Dude, you're the one claiming Trump ran a terrible campaign and yet he cleared some amazing hurdles.
Click to expand...

The two are not mutually-exclusive.

You move goal post like most leftists on here.
Click to expand...

I'm not a leftist. I'm to the left of you, if that means anything.
 
wareyin said:
I was being generous. I honestly can't remember a single valid, true complaint from you, just nonstop throwing whatever you had against the wall to see what stuck.

Benghazi and Email, yeah, both times where Clinton was repeatedly accused, investigated, and there was nothing there. But The Big Dog just kept on repeating the big lie for Trump. Glorious
Click to expand...

Well, the good news is that Hillary's supporters are learning nothing.
 
The Big Dog said:
Well, the good news is that Hillary's supporters are learning nothing.
Click to expand...

I learned a long time ago that The Big Dog was just going to keep on throwing crap at the wall to see what stuck, and if nothing stuck, he was just going to keep throwing the same things over and over. Eventually, even if nothing sticks, the wall still smells bad, so the crap thrower declares victory.
 
Fast Eddie B said:
I've been seeing it everywhere. Forums, FaceBook, Twitter, TV.

Blame it on the horribleness of Trump supporters.

Blame it on sexism.

Blame it on the Electoral College.

Blame it on third party candidates.

Blame it on a vast right wing conspiracy.

Blame it on voter suppression.

Hillary, to her credit, did none of that in her concession speech. But her supporters, much to their discredit, can't see where the blame really lies.
Click to expand...

This thread isn't a concession speech. Those factors listed above (some of them, anyway) played important parts in making Dump president. The defeat was razor thin, a small shift in any of these factors could have turned it.
 
I've spent a lot of time chastizing Clinton folks for being melodramatic and.... sorry if I find the gloating of the win deplorable. I had enough of the stereotyping during the cycle and even now following the elections. Stereotyping doesnt know party lines. Consider this fact if a Democrat wins in 4 to 8 years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom