Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
My apologies because I know I asked this previously but is the house being voted on in this election?
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
I think it is pending on Kelly Ayotte's and Roy Blunt's shifting in the wind.
Click to expand...

Richard Burr is in a tight race as well. The Rs have a distinct problem of every senate candidate bigly front running their nominee which might not materialize in the booth. Going to be interesting to see how all these tight races go down.
 
cantonear1968 said:
My apologies because I know I asked this previously but is the house being voted on in this election?
Click to expand...

Yes. The House has two year terms,so they are voted on in every national election. The Senate is getting all the publicity because the Dems have a real chance of taking it back, whereas the chances of them taking back the House are very low.. Senators have Six Year Terms,and One Third of the Senate is up every national election.
 
Last edited:
Stacko said:
Richard Burr is in a tight race as well. The Rs have a distinct problem of every senate candidate bigly front running their nominee which might not materialize in the booth. Going to be interesting to see how all these tight races go down.
Click to expand...

Ticket Splitting will be important. Republicans who cannot stomach Trump and will vote Clinton or Johnson for President, but will vote GOP for the Senate.
 
Stacko said:
Richard Burr is in a tight race as well. The Rs have a distinct problem of every senate candidate bigly front running their nominee which might not materialize in the booth. Going to be interesting to see how all these tight races go down.
Click to expand...

If Hillary wins, 50 is the magic number for the Dems since the Veep can cast a deciding vote in a tied Senate vote.
 
Last edited:
cantonear1968 said:
My apologies because I know I asked this previously but is the house being voted on in this election?
Click to expand...

There are elections for ALL House members every 2 years. The Senators are elected to 6 year terms and it is staggered so 1/3rd of the Senators are elected every 2 years. The problem for the Democrats is the gerrymandering which creates the boundaries for each district. So despite that millions more voted for Democrats in the last election the number of Republican congressmen out number the Democrats.
 
acbytesla said:
This is typical. Doesn't quote from the links, just posts from links to biased sources which have so little that it is absurd.
Click to expand...

He just called the actual emails on wikileaks "biased sources."

You literally cannot make this stuff up. Facts are biased against Hillary and the Clinton Crime Commission!

And I thought the nadir was the lie that I had misquoted the "sober her up" email.

Oh well, they got a shovel out, they might as well dig deeper.

"biased sources..."
 
The Big Dog said:
Wait Doug Band saying that Chelsea used funds for her wedding is a nonstory, and you think it prudent to wait until CNN, or HuffPo, or CNBC tells you what to think?

'k.
Click to expand...

Doug Band hates Chelsea and they've butted heads on several occasions, how does that make him more reliable? If anything it would give him a reason to be more vengeful and spiteful.

I think it's absolutely and entirely reasonable to wait for more information and corroboration, how doesn't that make sense?
 
The Big Dog said:
He just called the actual emails on wikileaks "biased sources."

You literally cannot make this stuff up. Facts are biased against Hillary and the Clinton Crime Commission!

And I thought the nadir was the lie that I had misquoted the "sober her up" email.

Oh well, they got a shovel out, they might as well dig deeper.

"biased sources..."
Click to expand...

...just because people say things in emails doesn't make them true. If you're going to repetitiously harp on this being a "skeptics forum", then you can't have it both ways. You can't just accept things at face value when they support your theory, but not at any other time. Well, I mean, you can, but it doesn't help the point you're trying to make.
 
plague311 said:
...just because people say things in emails doesn't make them true. If you're going to repetitiously harp on this being a "skeptics forum", then you can't have it both ways. You can't just accept things at face value when they support your theory, but not at any other time. Well, I mean, you can, but it doesn't help the point you're trying to make.
Click to expand...

:eye-poppi

It is almost as if Shillaries don't read the emails....

He asked the Clinton Campaign what he should ask Jeb, how in the world did you come up with the silly spin that it "doesn't make it true."

The act of emailing is appalling enough.

Oh why bother... her very low information voters (does De Hosue get voted on every two years?? actual emails are "biased" against the mutts that wrote them) will never understand anything more than Vote Hillary!
 
The Big Dog said:
:eye-poppi

It is almost as if Shillaries don't read the emails....

He asked the Clinton Campaign what he should ask Jeb, how in the world did you come up with the silly spin that it "doesn't make it true."

The act of emailing is appalling enough.

Oh why bother... her very low information voters (does De Hosue get voted on every two years?? actual emails are "biased" against the mutts that wrote them) will never understand anything more than Vote Hillary!
Click to expand...

Wait, I'm low information because I don't suck the teat of Wikileaks every chance I get? They've even admitted to openly making **** up:

WikiLeaks, the whistleblowing site set up by Julian Assange, has claimed that it was behind the fake opinion piece circulating on the internet under the name of Bill Keller, columnist and former executive editor of the New York Times.
Click to expand...

The admission

They've ********** up more than their fair share in the past, and to think that every single thing they release is proven true, or even from the place they say it's from, is a stretch. Just because you'll believe them no matter what, ESPECIALLY when they're saying something negative about Hillary, doesn't mean other people should.

You can insult me with your vague ******** statement about "low information voters", and I'll take it because I know it's not true. My participation in these threads and in general prove it's not. That being said, I'd rather be a "low information voter" than someone who believe anything I hear because my hyper-partisan blinders require me to do so.
 
dudalb said:
Ticket Splitting will be important. Republicans who cannot stomach Trump and will vote Clinton or Johnson for President, but will vote GOP for the Senate.
Click to expand...

Vs extra voters Clinton brings out to vote against racism and sexism.
 
plague311 said:
Wait, I'm low information because I don't suck the teat of Wikileaks every chance I get? They've even admitted to openly making **** up:



The admission

They've ********** up more than their fair share in the past, and to think that every single thing they release is proven true, or even from the place they say it's from, is a stretch. Just because you'll believe them no matter what, ESPECIALLY when they're saying something negative about Hillary, doesn't mean other people should.

You can insult me with your vague ******** statement about "low information voters", and I'll take it because I know it's not true. My participation in these threads and in general prove it's not. That being said, I'd rather be a "low information voter" than someone who believe anything I hear because my hyper-partisan blinders require me to do so.
Click to expand...

They are not saying anything about Hillary, they are publishing authentic emails from Hillary and her craven gang of thugs and lick-spittles, none of whom have been able to contradict any of those authenticated emails.

By the way, huge irony on the hyper-partisan comment!
 
acbytesla said:
There are elections for ALL House members every 2 years. The Senators are elected to 6 year terms and it is staggered so 1/3rd of the Senators are elected every 2 years. The problem for the Democrats is the gerrymandering which creates the boundaries for each district. So despite that millions more voted for Democrats in the last election the number of Republican congressmen out number the Democrats.
Click to expand...

Thank you for the information. And that's really messed. I remember The Daily Show doing a story on how Republicans redrew district lines to be more Right friendly. The system IS rigged. Just not in the way Trump fantasizes.
 
Last edited:
The Big Dog said:
:eye-poppi

It is almost as if Shillaries don't read the emails....

He asked the Clinton Campaign what he should ask Jeb, how in the world did you come up with the silly spin that it "doesn't make it true."

The act of emailing is appalling enough.

Oh why bother... her very low information voters (does De Hosue get voted on every two years?? actual emails are "biased" against the mutts that wrote them) will never understand anything more than Vote Hillary!
Click to expand...


Still waiting for the bombshell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom