Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Megalodon said:
All evidence obtained during countless investigations and hearings points to her being not guilty of any crimes.

All evidence of recent events points to the FBI illegally coordinating with a presidential campaign against another.
Click to expand...

All evidence obtained during countless investigations and hearings points to her being guilty of crimes.

All evidence of recent events points to the Justice Department illegally coordinating with a presidential campaign against another.

Cripes at least I have the actual email that shows it, plus the head of the justice department cozied up to the main perp's husband, and her boss is running around the country ripping her opponent and singing the perp's praises.

Organized crime on a massive scale.
 
The Big Dog said:
All evidence obtained during countless investigations and hearings points to her being guilty of crimes.

All evidence of recent events points to the Justice Department illegally coordinating with a presidential campaign against another.

Cripes at least I have the actual email that shows it, plus the head of the justice department cozied up to the main perp's husband, and her boss is running around the country ripping her opponent and singing the perp's praises.

Organized crime on a massive scale.
Click to expand...

Yes, we know that jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams... save your manure to those who will eat it.

All the evidence points to her being guilty but no indictment ever made... such organized crime, one wonders why she just didn't take over.
 
The Big Dog said:
Yeah, the first time you posted that, it didn't support that claim then either.
Click to expand...

I am not going to look for more support for that claim for you.


I want to gain information from anyone who is willing to share any knowledge
about the FBI injecting themselves into, and maybe giving information
ahead of Comey's letter to Giuliani.

Please leave the rabid partisan barking for someone else.
 
snoop_doxie said:
Would it be considered criminal for the FBI to leak information to Giuliani
two days before Comey's letter to Congress?

http://www.salon.com/2016/11/04/rud...gn-got-advance-notice-of-james-comeys-letter/

"Rudy is now openly boasting that the the Trump campaign got advance notice
of James Comey's letter."
Click to expand...

It supports, and helps Trump, while hurting Hillary. That means it's ok.

Honestly, I would just ignore TBD. I doubt he believes a word he's posting, he's just obsessed with Hillary.
 
Shalamar said:
It's.. depressing overall.

The only thing that keeps me going is that if president trump royally screws up the country, I can move back to Canada.
Click to expand...

If Trump drags the US down the drain, be guaranteed that Canada will get also get sucked down by the suction.
 
Shalamar said:
It supports, and helps Trump, while hurting Hillary. That means it's ok.

Honestly, I would just ignore TBD. I doubt he believes a word he's posting, he's just obsessed with Hillary.
Click to expand...

Yep, I got it now.

I noticed that Giuliani changed the subject to Bill meeting Loretta Lynch for
38 minutes.

He asks "what could have been said in those 38 minutes?"

Giuliani was talking to Wolf Blitzer.
Blitzer was trying to get Rudy to admit that Comey was bad, bad, bad when
he did not indict Hillary, but he has a chance to redeem himself when he
finds something indictable.

What has been said to Giuliani during this entire election cycle?
 
Argumemnon said:
I never spoke of any sort of equivalence of outrage. This is, again, your own fabrication.

"Outrage" means "an extremely strong reaction of anger, shock, or indignation." acording to the internets. I find it hard to have such a reaction when something common, though wrong, occurs again and again. Am I outraged by Trump's lies? No, since he lies pretty much all the time. If you can maintain outrage after such repetition, I guess we react differently to this sort of thing.

ETA: Of course it also depends on where this ad comes from. If it's a random internet douchebag, meh. If it's straight from the Trump campaign, that's an entirely different matter.
Click to expand...
I knew you would ignore the facts. You are the one that asked, "What outrage?" You brought it up. You asked and I, among others answered. Then instead of addressing our answers to YOUR QUESTION, you went off telling us your opinion which had nothing to do with YOUR QUESTION and OUR ANSWERS.

I think we're done here.
 
quadraginta said:
Doesn't that involve doing obscene and disgusting things to poor innocent french fries?

It doesn't seem right to use "decent" in the same phrase.
Click to expand...

How dare you good sir!

French Fries, Cheese Curds and gravy are naught but mere perfection!

(My wife thinks it's disgusting as well.)
 
The Big Dog said:
All evidence obtained during countless investigations and hearings points to her being guilty of crimes.
Click to expand...
NO IT DOESN'T. IN FACT THE OPPOSITE IS TRUE.
The Big Dog said:
All evidence of recent events points to the Justice Department illegally coordinating with a presidential campaign against another.

Cripes at least I have the actual email that shows it, plus the head of the justice department cozied up to the main perp's husband, and her boss is running around the country ripping her opponent and singing the perp's praises.

Organized crime on a massive scale.
Click to expand...

YEA, AND I HAVE CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE, THAT SANTA, THE EASTER BUNNY AND JESUS IS REAL.:rolleyes:
 
eerok said:
...Almost as remarkable as the unsuitability of Trump as a presidential candidate is the fervent demonizing of Clinton, who's fairly boring and centrist. Politics loves drama.
Click to expand...

Very true, Hillary Clinton is pretty much a moderate Democrat.

She was my U.S. senator for about eight years. The first time around I seriously considered not voting for her, voting for the Republican candidate instead. I had read so many negative things about her and I really disliked her. I couldn't really put my finger on why I disliked her so much...I just did.

However as U.S. senator she changed my mind. I thought she was excellent. She's a hard worker, was always there when something happened and was always the voice of reason. Not adding fuel to the fire. And in fact her husband says, Hillary always believes that problems can be solved. That attitude really came across when she was senator. She was also very willing to work with Republicans, she didn't play party politics.

I think she'll make a good president. If elected I think a lot of her detractors -- the ones who are capable of reason -- will be pleasantly surprised. Except there has been so much animosity created I think the Republicans will never support her and will do everything they can to fight her. And the hell with the rest of the country.
 
Last edited:
newyorkguy said:
Very true, Hillary Clinton is pretty much a moderate Democrat.

She was my U.S. senator for about eight years. The first time around I seriously considered not voting for her, voting for the Republican candidate instead. I had read so many negative things about her and I really disliked her. I couldn't really put my finger on why I disliked her so much...I just did.

However as U.S. senator she changed my mind. I thought she was excellent. She's a hard worker, was always there when something happened and was always the voice of reason. Not adding fuel to the fire. And in fact her husband says, Hillary always believes that problems can be solved. That attitude really came across when she was senator. She was also very willing to work with Republicans, she didn't play party politics.

I think she'll make a good president. If elected I think a lot of her detractors -- the ones who are capable of reason -- will be pleasantly surprised.

<snip>
Click to expand...


No they won't, That would involve admitting that they might have been wrong ... and gullible.

Reason be damned.

They are way too invested in the 'Evil Hillary' meme to be able to back down gracefully.

So they won't back down at all.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
I knew you would ignore the facts. You are the one that asked, "What outrage?" You brought it up. You asked and I, among others answered. Then instead of addressing our answers to YOUR QUESTION, you went off telling us your opinion which had nothing to do with YOUR QUESTION and OUR ANSWERS.
Click to expand...

No, that's not what I did at all. Yes, the question was answered but then people got pissed off that I didn't find it outrageous, and then thought I meant it was equivalent to just any other con. You guys just keep making stuff up as you go, don't you?

I think we're done here.
Click to expand...

So there!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom