Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Big Dog said:
Explain exactly how all that nonsense you just wrote deals with the DNC and the Clinton campaign conspiring to screw Bernie Sanders at the Town Hall Debate?
Click to expand...
When did it become a "thing" where you can demand someone answere off topic questions rather than respond to what is said to you? That's called a "red herring".
 
Mycroft said:
When did it become a "thing" where you can demand someone answere off topic questions rather than respond to what is said to you? That's called a "red herring".
Click to expand...

Oh dear, you really did not know that Brazile leaked those questions for a DNC debate against Sanders.

But it is a private organization that can put its thumb on the scale just as hard as it damn well pleases in favor of a politically corrupt insider, and a big old **** you to all the dopes who voted for Sanders.

Fantastic.
 
Say, I am not a member of the Department of Justice either, I guess that means it is OK that a mole inside the DoJ leaked a head's up too?

Thoroughly Corrupt Hilly, the breakout musical of 2016.
 
The Big Dog said:
Oh dear, you really did not know that Brazile leaked those questions for a DNC debate against Sanders.

But it is a private organization that can put its thumb on the scale just as hard as it damn well pleases in favor of a politically corrupt insider, and a big old **** you to all the dopes who voted for Sanders.

Fantastic.
Click to expand...

Please respond to my post rather than tangentially commenting on it.
 
The Big Dog said:
Say, I am not a member of the Department of Justice either, I guess that means it is OK that a mole inside the DoJ leaked a head's up too?

Thoroughly Corrupt Hilly, the breakout musical of 2016.
Click to expand...

DoJ is a government agency, not a private group.
 
The Big Dog said:
I tried to, it is just so ridiculous that I realized that I will never understand that corruption is OK because it is a private group mindset.
Click to expand...

It is not corruption in the context of private group. Their membership and the organization itself is allowed to treat one group more favorable than others.
 
BobTheCoward said:
It is not corruption in the context of private group. Their membership and the organization itself is allowed to treat one group more favorable than others.
Click to expand...

That is utterly false:

In the conduct and management of the affairs and procedures of the Democratic National Committee, particularly as they apply to the preparation and conduct of the Presidential nomination process, the Chairperson shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process.”
Click to expand...

Donna Brazile Debate Question Leak May Help DNC Class Action Lawsuit

Oh well, it isn't often that you see an argument as frivolous as the DNC can screw on of its primary candidates and I thank you for persisting with it.

Hillary 2016, The Fix Was In!
 
The Big Dog said:
That is utterly false:



Donna Brazile Debate Question Leak May Help DNC Class Action Lawsuit

Oh well, it isn't often that you see an argument as frivolous as the DNC can screw on of its primary candidates and I thank you for persisting with it.

Hillary 2016, The Fix Was In!
Click to expand...

The class action won't win because generic voters dont have any right to a private groups own rules. I didn't say they had no rules written on the subject. Their adherence to them is up to the group to decide internally. Let a member sue if they feel the chairperson violated their duty.
 
BobTheCoward said:
The class action won't win because generic voters dont have any right to a private groups own rules. I didn't say they had no rules written on the subject. Their adherence to them is up to the group to decide internally. Let a member sue if they feel the chairperson violated their duty.
Click to expand...

they did.

Thanks for posting.
 
BobTheCoward said:
Which is why I said solely accountable to their members. They owe their members something. They owe you nothing.
Click to expand...

They owe me nothing? That is an odd bit of a derail, not sure why you think the focus is on me instead of the DNC/Clinton Gang's despicable conduct.

Odd.

By the way, I am a Cook County Democrat
 
The Big Dog said:
They owe me nothing? That is an odd bit of a derail, not sure why you think the focus is on me instead of the DNC/Clinton Gang's despicable conduct.

Odd.

By the way, I am a Cook County Democrat
Click to expand...

Not a derail. That was the whole point of post 818. You are not a member of the DNC.
 
Originally Posted by eeyore1954 View Post
You don't think secretly accepting a question in advance of the debate is wrong?
Click to expand...
BobTheCoward said:
No.
Click to expand...

Suppose I am interviewing two candidates for a job and am going to ask them a specific accounting question. A member of my staff is friendly with one of them and tells him/her the question in advance. That person doesn’t tell me about this when I ask them the question.
Do you feel there is nothing wrong with that?
 
eeyore1954 said:
Suppose I am interviewing two candidates for a job and am going to ask them a specific accounting question. A member of my staff is friendly with one of them and tells him/her the question in advance. That person doesn’t tell me about this when I ask them the question.
Do you feel there is nothing wrong with that?
Click to expand...

Wrong for who? The interviewee? I think that is the equivalent person here.

No.
 
eeyore1954 said:
Suppose I am interviewing two candidates for a job and am going to ask them a specific accounting question. A member of my staff is friendly with one of them and tells him/her the question in advance. That person doesn’t tell me about this when I ask them the question.
Do you feel there is nothing wrong with that?
Click to expand...

Suppose you are interviewing 2 candidates for a job treating water in Flint, Michigan. One of those candidates is doing prep work, and in the course of that preparation, is told that an obvious question about your business (like how to filter lead) might get asked. Do you make a big deal and pretend that the question was unexpected and was "leaked" to the applicant?
 
Last edited:
The Big Dog said:
They owe me nothing? That is an odd bit of a derail, not sure why you think the focus is on me instead of the DNC/Clinton Gang's despicable conduct.

Odd.

By the way, I am a Cook County Democrat
Click to expand...

By the way, do you just mean you are registered, or are you someone in the party?
 
A bit about the release of the Marc Rich documents by the FBI. They say in a statement that it's standard procedure following an FOIA request, therefore coincidence. Today there was some disinformation circulating on twitter that they also released documents about Vince Foster, but a simple search with the wayback machine proved that those documents were released in May 2011.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom