Ed Clintonemails.com: Who is Eric Hoteham Part 3

[TheL8Elvis]

Sure enough to provide a couple of examples?

I'll dig through the thread and look, when
I get some time . I'll sound like sunmaster here though - it won't change anyone's mind and just be a bunch of work for me....

 

[The Big Dog]

John Podesta <[email protected]> wrote to Cheyl Mills:

On another matter....and not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have > to dump all those emails so better to do so sooner than later

The Date? March 2, 2015. What else happened on March 2, 2015? NYT bombshell report on the existence of the private cowboy server.

There is your intent FBI, go get them.

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/41841#searchresult

 

[NoahFence]

John Podesta <[email protected]> wrote to Cheyl Mills:



The Date? March 2, 2015. What else happened on March 2, 2015? NYT bombshell report on the existence of the private cowboy server.

There is your intent FBI, go get them.

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/41841#searchresult

Wow. That's hard hitting stuff.

If only you people didn't nominate a Russian puppet dictator wannabe, xenophobic, small handed womanizing idiot who can't read, pay attention for more than 10 minutes, or accept any kind of criticism.

 

[plague311]

John Podesta <[email protected]> wrote to Cheyl Mills:



The Date? March 2, 2015. What else happened on March 2, 2015? NYT bombshell report on the existence of the private cowboy server.

There is your intent FBI, go get them.

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/41841#searchresult

That means nothing in the IT world. The word "dump" can refer to a thousand things, and only someone that knows nothing about it would imply it's immediately nefarious. I do data dumps all of the time and nothing gets deleted.

****, every time I update the source code for my sons' Minecraft server I do a data dump to see if people have been using hack commands.

 

[The Big Dog]

That means nothing in the IT world. The word "dump" can refer to a thousand things, and only someone that knows nothing about it would imply it's immediately nefarious. I do data dumps all of the time and nothing gets deleted.

****, every time I update the source code for my sons' Minecraft server I do a data dump to see if people have been using hack commands.

Cheryl Mills and John Podesta are not in the IT world.

 

[plague311]

Cheryl Mills and John Podesta are not in the IT world.

...right, but best case scenario you're just projecting. Just like you've done with every single release that has ever come out with regards to Hillary, you're assuming the most nefarious of reasons. I was merely pointing out that they could be referring to a lot of things. In fact, he could have just heard that from an IT individual that same day, which is why he brought it up.

Anyway, I know you won't ever change your opinion. I just wanted other people to know that there are more reasonable explanations that don't involve the implied, without any evidence, dastardly deeds from Hillary.

ETA: Not to mention your implication flies in the face of reality. They wanted to "dump" the emails but still held on to some 60k of them? So many of your theories contradict each other. It's nonsensical.

 

[The Big Dog]

...right, but best case scenario you're just projecting. Just like you've done with every single release that has ever come out with regards to Hillary, you're assuming the most nefarious of reasons. I was merely pointing out that they could be referring to a lot of things. In fact, he could have just heard that from an IT individual that same day, which is why he brought it up.

Anyway, I know you won't ever change your opinion. I just wanted other people to know that there are more reasonable explanations that don't involve the implied, without any evidence, dastardly deeds from Hillary.

Podesta and Mills are lawyers, not IT geeks.

 

[plague311]

Podesta and Mills are lawyers, not IT geeks.

Yeah, I caught that when you said that same **** the first time. It holds no more relevance just because you repeat it. You have no idea what either of them do in their own time, or their level of technical savvy.

I worked at Space Aliens Bar and Grill when I programmed my first "snake" style video game. Which in 2002 was pretty impressive for me. Just because they're lawyers doesn't mean they are mentally challenged when it comes to computers. Again, they could have heard it from someone in IT. Even if they didn't, it never happened, so it's a lot to do about nothing.

 

[The Big Dog]

Yeah, I caught that when you said that same **** the first time. It holds no more relevance just because you repeat it. You have no idea what either of them do in their own time, or their level of technical savvy.

I worked at Space Aliens Bar and Grill when I programmed my first "snake" style video game. Which in 2002 was pretty impressive for me. Just because they're lawyers doesn't mean they are mentally challenged when it comes to computers. Again, they could have heard it from someone in IT. Even if they didn't, it never happened, so it's a lot to do about nothing.

cool story bro.

Two lawyers being dumb enough to talk about dumping emails knowing that they have been requested by State, the Benghazi Committee and numerous FOIA requests are not using technical jargon they might have heard from the "IT guy."

 

[wareyin]

cool story bro.

Two lawyers being dumb enough to talk about dumping emails knowing that they have been requested by State, the Benghazi Committee and numerous FOIA requests are not using technical jargon they might have heard from the "IT guy."

Evidence for the highlighted other than your speculation? Because so far your speculation has a less than stellar track record.


Oh, who am I kidding, why would you start providing evidence for your baseless accusations and smears now, after all these years?

 

[The Big Dog]

John Podesta <[email protected]> wrote to Cheyl Mills:



The Date? March 2, 2015. What else happened on March 2, 2015? NYT bombshell report on the existence of the private cowboy server.

There is your intent FBI, go get them.

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/41841#searchresult

Evidence for the highlighted other than your speculation? Because so far your speculation has a less than stellar track record.


Oh, who am I kidding, why would you start providing evidence for your baseless accusations and smears now, after all these years?

Perhaps one should read the thread before starting personal attacks? Oh who am i kidding?

Oh by the way, later that month the Platte River IT guy had an "oh ****" moment and wiped the server.

He took the Fifth when asked about it.

Sounds totes innocent

 

[plague311]

cool story bro.

Two lawyers being dumb enough to talk about dumping emails knowing that they have been requested by State, the Benghazi Committee and numerous FOIA requests are not using technical jargon they might have heard from the "IT guy."

Not really technical jargon, man. Kind of the point I'm trying to make here. A "dump" can mean literally anything. Couple that with the fact that the emails weren't actually deleted and she turned over a ton of emails.

Just another situation where all parties involved are extremely nefarious and really stupid at the same time.

 

[The Big Dog]

Not really technical jargon, man. Kind of the point I'm trying to make here. A "dump" can mean literally anything. Couple that with the fact that the emails weren't actually deleted and she turned over a ton of emails.

Just another situation where all parties involved are extremely nefarious and really stupid at the same time.

No the emails were actually deleted, the fact that the FBI was able to recover some was because Hillary's gang is both nefarious and really stupid.

You should really try to understand the basic facts

 

[wareyin]

Perhaps one should read the thread before starting personal attacks? Oh who am i kidding?

Oh by the way, later that month the Platte River IT guy had an "oh ****" moment and wiped the server.

He took the Fifth when asked about it.

Sounds totes innocent

My bad, highlighted the wrong bit. Your evidence that the emails they were "dumping" were the ones "requested by State, the Benghazi Committee and numerous FOIA requests"? Your evidence that "dumping" didn't refer to, say, a mass email campaign they wanted to shoot out, since non-tech people might use the word "delete" rather than "dump" if they are trying to delete emails?

And, in case you are capable of doing that critical thinking thing, something not "sound[ing] totes innocent" is not actually evidence that it is not innocent. Especially so after it is run through the patented The-Big-Dog-smear-and-innuendo-o-matic.

 

[The Big Dog]

My bad, highlighted the wrong bit. Your evidence that the emails they were "dumping" were the ones "requested by State, the Benghazi Committee and numerous FOIA requests"? Your evidence that "dumping" didn't refer to, say, a mass email campaign they wanted to shoot out, since non-tech people might use the word "delete" rather than "dump" if they are trying to delete emails?

And, in case you are capable of doing that critical thinking thing, something not "sound[ing] totes innocent" is not actually evidence that it is not innocent. Especially so after it is run through the patented The-Big-Dog-smear-and-innuendo-o-matic.

But we KNOW they "dumped" the electronic versions.

It is odd, you guys keep speculating innocent explanations based on wishful thinking, and I'll keep pointing to actual emails ("dump all those emails") and actual facts (the clintonemails were in fact dumped).

 

[wareyin]

But we KNOW they "dumped" the electronic versions.

It is odd, you guys keep speculating innocent explanations based on wishful thinking, and I'll keep pointing to actual emails ("dump all those emails") and actual facts (the clintonemails were in fact dumped).

"They" dumped them? Podesta or Mills?

And "we guys" are pointing out that your patented The-Big-Dog-smear-and-innuendo-o-matic is not the only way of interpreting the vague, out of context statements that you keep, well, smearing with innuendo.

 

[The Big Dog]

"They" dumped them? Podesta or Mills?

And "we guys" are pointing out that your patented The-Big-Dog-smear-and-innuendo-o-matic is not the only way of interpreting the vague, out of context statements that you keep, well, smearing with innuendo.

"dump the emails" is vague? lolz.

"Or." Hillary's gang that is who dumped them. You do know that Mills was acting as Clinton's attorney with regard to returning the emails to State, right?

That Mills was the lead attorney on that, right? And Podesta is in charge of Hillary's campaign?

March 2. Damn....

 

[NoahFence]

No the emails were actually deleted, the fact that the FBI was able to recover some was because Hillary's gang is both nefarious and really stupid.

You should really try to understand the basic facts

I agree with the big dog here - the emails were deleted.

Follow up:

Who gives a **** when the alternative is documented to be working for the Russians, has an unhealthy fixation with his daughter, is on trial for massive fraud, fails to pay his debts (See: Russia), is on trial for child rape, and has the attention span of a toddler and the temper to go with it?

Seriously TBD - can you picture Trump addressing the UN? Seriously?

 

[wareyin]

"dump the emails" is vague? lolz.

"Or." Hillary's gang that is who dumped them. You do know that Mills was acting as Clinton's attorney with regard to returning the emails to State, right?

That Mills was the lead attorney on that, right? And Podesta is in charge of Hillary's campaign?

March 2. Damn....

Yes, "dump the emails" is vague. "Dump" has more than one meaning, and "the emails" certainly isn't specific. One wonders if you really aren't capable of looking at anything without "evil Clinton" filters on.

Yeah, Mills was lead attorney, and Podesta is in charge of Clinton's campaign. Now, who deleted the emails at Platte River: Mills, Podesta, or someone under their command? And, I'm sure you'll correct me if I'm wrong, but Platte River wasn't even supposed to be storing emails past, what, 60 days? So Mills and Podesta are discussing deleting emails that they weren't even aware of because Platte River wasn't supposed to be storing them? Yeah, sounds "totes" legit, bro.

 

[plague311]

I agree with the big dog here - the emails were deleted.

I'm not contesting that emails were deleted, I'm contesting WHAT emails were deleted. As the big dog just said, they recovered the deleted emails. Hell, he spells it out in his post. What did they recover in the deleted emails? Jack ****. So why would Podesta bother to have irrelevant emails "dumped", per his nefarious plan? It makes no sense at all. It's just reaching at straws. Not that straw grasping is strange for this.

It should also be noted that Hillary willfully turned over the backup from Datto. Something she had no requirement to do. She could have fought it and probably won, since the backup was illegally stored.

It's just another red herring. Implying that Hillary was trying to cover things up, but couldn't find anyone to do it properly. They've found .PST files, they've found the extra data backup, they've now found more emails. I agree though, The Big Dog has found something in this nonsense. More **** to grasp to.