Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
cripes, seeing an electronic version of an email to or from an @clintonemails.com account stored on an unauthorized device automatically makes it new evidence.

This is not brain surgery, hell it ain't even trading cattle futures.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
No, again, not if you call a particular Pubbie first. Not to mention, Comey was not yet aware if there was new evidence. He only knew there was a new place to look.

I suppose if Comey admitted he couldn't control leaks from his department (ironic given how he railed on Clinton for how she did her job) and he wanted to clear things up before it was leaked that a new warrant was issued, and had he not called Chaffetz first, I could agree he didn't act in a Partisan way.
Click to expand...
The thing is that FBI agents knew about it for weeks and it didn't leak. And then they tell him and he sends the letter the next day.
 
Stacko said:
If there was new evidence and Comey failed to inform congress, he would be in dereliction of his duties. Sending a letter that says effectively, "I dunno, maybe?" serves no functional purpose for the case. Once the FBI confirmed if there was new evidence or not, he would then have cause to act or not.
Click to expand...

No, that is not accurate. It is not the Director's job to inform Congress on every piece of evidence on every investigation. In fact, almost all investigations are conducted as privately as possible. That there could be no actionable reason for the letter demonstrates how highly questionable sending it was.

That saId, Obama is now defending him, although I'm not sure why.
 
BobTheCoward said:
And who is influenced by.this? There isn't s single person here we can point to.

Plus, everything about it is neutral. It is the equivalent of saying what color of pants suit she is wearing.
Click to expand...

Virtually all of Donald Trump's supporters are not reasonable people. They are easily manipulated (Like their dictator wanna be).
 
White House says Comey is not trying to influence the election.

That should put an end to that nonsense.
 
Tony Stark said:
It is not necessary to prove that it does influence the election, just that it could.

He had no good reason to send the letter at all and he definitely knew the Republicans would use it to attempt to influence the election and that it would be all over the news.

If Comey didn't have election timing problems with this, why did he have one regarding Russia?
Click to expand...

The Russian thing is a negative. This email story is neutral.
 
The Big Dog said:
White House says Comey is not trying to influence the election.

That should put an end to that nonsense.
Click to expand...
I can see why they would prefer not to believe that the guy they picked for the job is trying to influence the election. Or maybe they're just saying that because otherwise would demand that they fire him right away, and they would rather do it after the election. Or let Hillary do it.
 
BobTheCoward said:
The Russian thing is a negative. This email story is neutral.
Click to expand...

Not according to the election betting odds, which dropped Clinton's odds by 6% overnight, nor according to places like 538 (who admittedly say the cause isn't clear) who have Clinton's odds of winning also dropping by 6%, nor the poll averages, in which Clinton's lead dropped.
 
Tony Stark said:
I can see why they would prefer not to believe that the guy they picked for the job is trying to influence the election. Or maybe they're just saying that because otherwise would demand that they fire him right away, and they would rather do it after the election. Or let Hillary do it.
Click to expand...

Noe you sound like logger.
 
The Big Dog said:
cripes, seeing an electronic version of an email to or from an @clintonemails.com account stored on an unauthorized device automatically makes it new evidence.

This is not brain surgery, hell it ain't even trading cattle futures.
Click to expand...

This has already been pointed out but at the time Commey sent the letter the FBI didn't even have legal authority to view the emails. They didn't get the warrant until Sunday evening! No one saw an electronic version of anything. The FBI made the director aware of a laptop (IIRC) that Wiener's wife MAY have used to view emails and thus could contain emails relevant to the closed investigation into Hillary Clinton. However Commey has admitted any email on there might just be a copy of emails the FBI already accessed.

At the time the letter was sent to congress, possibly to a republican first, the FBI had no idea what might be found, if anything, that relates to Clinton, and lacked the legal authority to even look.

Just common sense would tell you that if someone uses multiple devices to view the same email account you won't find different emails on each device.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom