The All Purpose Hillary Clinton Thread

Today on CNN. Hillary in her plane. Any slight paraphrasing is incidental.

Is "paraphrasing" newspeak for "no, I never heard that but it's what I hope she'd have said". I saw the interviews from the plane. No one. Not Drudge, not Alex Jones, not Breitbart (a.k.a. his campaign management), not Trump, not Kellyanne, not Fox..... no one quotes an even similar comment.

Your sources are roughly, "stuff I heard from a guy mumbling to himself in my mirror this morning".

This is one of our critical-thinking-free zones. All you need for posting in Politics and Social Issues/Current Events is an opinion. When you make **** up,... simply because in this election season so much truly unbelievable material is being uttered... say that you're making **** up. It's one of the rare items we insist on credibility. Quotes should be quotes. We expect them to be taken out of context, but at least start with a real quote.

This one is very minor. It's just unnecessary.
 
Is "paraphrasing" newspeak for "no, I never heard that but it's what I hope she'd have said". I saw the interviews from the plane. No one. Not Drudge, not Alex Jones, not Breitbart (a.k.a. his campaign management), not Trump, not Kellyanne, not Fox..... no one quotes an even similar comment.

Your sources are roughly, "stuff I heard from a guy mumbling to himself in my mirror this morning".

This is one of our critical-thinking-free zones. All you need for posting in Politics and Social Issues/Current Events is an opinion. When you make **** up,... simply because in this election season so much truly unbelievable material is being uttered... say that you're making **** up. It's one of the rare items we insist on credibility. Quotes should be quotes. We expect them to be taken out of context, but at least start with a real quote.

This one is very minor. It's just unnecessary.


So if I saw Hillary (or Trump) kick a drunk who has passed out on the street and no-one else sees it, then I cannot report it on this forum?

I looked for the video without success. I guess the media also decided it was too bad to repeat and it is in the archives of CNN.

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited breach of rule 12


While searching I came across this video.

It is the verification that you seek, except about Hillary being nasty. I almost feel sorry for Bill when watching it. They deserve each other. Does the US deserve Hillary and Bill again the White House?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5NEmX4JGQg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So if I saw Hillary (or Trump) kick a drunk who has passed out on the street and no-one else sees it, then I cannot report it on this forum?

I looked for the video without success. I guess the media also decided it was too bad to repeat and it is in the archives of CNN.
Edited by Agatha: 
Edited breach of rule 12


While searching I came across this video.

It is the verification that you seek, except about Hillary being nasty. I almost feel sorry for Bill when watching it. They deserve each other. Does the US deserve Hillary and Bill again the White House?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5NEmX4JGQg
I'd like to see more of that sort of unscripted, feistiness from her. Thanks for sharing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So if I saw Hillary (or Trump) kick a drunk who has passed out on the street and no-one else sees it, then I cannot report it on this forum?

I looked for the video without success. I guess the media also decided it was too bad to repeat and it is in the archives of CNN.

A conspiracy, eh? She's called him a racist and a liar and they covered that. Why would all the networks and reporters on the flight ignore a story after the fact, and suppress it?

Oh, and if you claim to see Hillary or Donald doing anything, then we're going to ask you for evidence. In this case, you claim to have seen a news feature from her plane the very morning that you wrote the post. I watched all the coverage available of the morning stories. I saw WHAT SHE DID SAY about the hotel opening. What you imagine seeing was not in any feed that I get.

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited breach of rule 12

I'm not even a Hillary supporter,
Edited by Agatha: 
Edited breach of rule 12
I'm not seeking followers, but anyone in this sub-forum who reads knows exactly what my agenda is. I've stated it often enough: Stop The Republicans. Hillary happens to be the Dem candidate for President. She needs to win in order to keep the GOP out of the White House (because a GOP win would carry them to control of the three branches - Executive, Legislative, Judicial). Scoop Jackson could be running, or Bernie Sanders, or Al Gore... I'd still be out here trashing made-up stories.


Like the one below:


While searching I came across this video.

It is the verification that you seek, except about Hillary being nasty. I almost feel sorry for Bill when watching it. They deserve each other. Does the US deserve Hillary and Bill again the White House?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5NEmX4JGQg

What is this crap? What exactly is that supposed to prove? Gary, The Crazed, Franchi? He's like James O'Keefe meets Alex Jones. Have you seen his grand expose of her cursing on camera during the first debate? It's so weak that it's funny.

As to the video that you think will solidify my opinion.... We don't see the opening, but I'm guessing the kid made some sort of political speech or that it sounded to Hill like he was going classical misogynist and wanted to know what the important person in her household thought, you know, the one with the dick. She's certainly angry. Where do you see racism? Because the idiot she's reacting to happens to be black? I'd say she was ageist - disrespecting youth - at most. She's definitely condescending, but adults tend to that when they're, oh secretary of state and some oh-so-clever youngster asks them something stupid.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So if I saw Hillary (or Trump) kick a drunk who has passed out on the street and no-one else sees it, then I cannot report it on this forum?

I looked for the video without success. I guess the media also decided it was too bad to repeat and it is in the archives of CNN.

Edited by Agatha: 
Edited breach of rule 12


While searching I came across this video.

It is the verification that you seek, except about Hillary being nasty. I almost feel sorry for Bill when watching it. They deserve each other. Does the US deserve Hillary and Bill again the White House?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5NEmX4JGQg

This is idiotic! A flash of annoyance at being disrespected as Secretary of State? Trump shows more anger at his bowel movements!

In fact we saw more anger on Trump at the end of the 3rd debate knowing he'd blown it and ripping up his notes!

If this is the best you can come up with for Hillary's temperament vs all available evidence against Trump ("No puppet! No puppet! You're the puppet!") then we all have nothing to worry about when she becomes president.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That video is the worst example they have of Hillary being nasty? How pathetic. Also, what does the student being black have to do with it?
 
So if I saw Hillary (or Trump) kick a drunk who has passed out on the street and no-one else sees it, then I cannot report it on this forum?

You can "report" anything you choose (I'm looking at you, 'Squatch threads). If you hope to be believed, you should be prepared to make with evidence.

<snip>
 
Stupid - your opinion (influenced by the media and wrong)
idiotic - your opinion (influenced by the media and wrong)
greedy -your opinion (influenced by the media and wrong)
lying - your opinion (influenced by the media and wrong)

You cannot make a reasoned argument for your opinions. For a site that makes big deal of not using ad hominems, the torrent of them from supposed skeptics is incredible.

There is plenty of objective evidence that shows Trump to be stupid, idiotic, greedy, liar. Much of that evidence is from Trump himself.

By the way, since that stupid, idiotic, greedy, liar Donald J. Trump is not a Forum Member but he is a public figure, then it is quite within the Forum Rules to call Donald J. Trump a stupid, idiotic, greedy, liar.

Nice one. :thumbsup:

If it was not sarcastic I would take issue with your lack of morality.

Great! I am glad that you liked it.

And by the way, you are quite at liberty to take issue with my morality during normal business hours.

Also, if you send me $200.00, then you will be at liberty to take issue with my morality 24/7 for the rest of the year. Call now, operators are standing by!
 
I watched the news on Al Jazeera, and they gave me something to look forward to if Hillary wins.

Elizabeth Warren. Really disliked her campaigning for Hillary. But she will be a force in the Clinton admin against the Big Banks. Nasty with a capital "N".

Bernie Sanders. He will have clout and influence.

Maybe Hillary will do as she promised - go into the White House and not be heard from for 4 years. Sit at her phone selling inside information.
 
I watched the news on Al Jazeera, and they gave me something to look forward to if Hillary wins.

Elizabeth Warren. Really disliked her campaigning for Hillary. But she will be a force in the Clinton admin against the Big Banks. Nasty with a capital "N".

Bernie Sanders. He will have clout and influence.

Maybe Hillary will do as she promised - go into the White House and not be heard from for 4 years. Sit at her phone selling inside information.

This is getting to be like talking to Ronald Reagan, who famously got all teary-eyed when he and Pat O'Brian(his co-star in Knut Rockne, All American) paid a return visit to Notre Dame.... their alma mater... in a movie. They'd never been there; all the Notre Dame scenes were filmed at Warner Brothers Burbank studio. But there they were sucking in the memories and holding back the tears.

The hilited part: That was SNL. That was an actress playing the part of Hillary Clinton.... NOT Hillary Clinton.
 
Do not accuse other posters of being trolls or shills. It is both uncivil and a breach of rule 12.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Agatha
 
(snip)

The hilited part: That was SNL. That was an actress playing the part of Hillary Clinton.... NOT Hillary Clinton.


Oh yes. Right. The actress was probably more real than Hillary.

(I have started cutting back a lot on food intake to drop my blood pressure and lose a little weight before a knee replacement operation on Tuesday 8 November. I am a little light headed.)

FBI to re-open email probe. Breaking news.
 
Yeah, that was a good response. Seriously. :thumbsup:

The Alt-Right-Net has been abuzz for about two weeks that there was a video out there "coming soon to a conspiracy site near you" showing Hillary's racism. I think this is it. As usual, it's one of those "If you tilt your head this way, put the monitor on low resolution and put a banana in your ear, you can see that it's clearly Behavior X" videos. Franchi is a clown.
 
Democrats should ask Clinton to step aside

As secretary of state she kept classified documents on the home-brew server in her basement, which is against the law. She lied about it to the American people. She couldn't remember details dozens of times when questioned by the FBI. Her aides destroyed evidence by BleachBit and hammers. Her husband, Bill, met secretly on an airport tarmac with Attorney General Loretta Lynch for about a half-hour, and they said all they talked about was golf and the grandkids.

And there was no prosecution of Hillary.

That isn't merely wrong and unethical. It is poisonous.

Read more:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...clinton-emails-kass-1030-20161028-column.html (October 29, 2016)


Yep, the tide has finally turned. Even the left-leaning publication "The Chicago Tribune" can no longer defend the neverending lies and corruption that is part and parcel of the Clinton crime family.
 
Last edited:
Yep, the tide has finally turned. Even the left-leaning publication "The Chicago Tribune" can no longer defend the neverending lies and corruption that is part and parcel of the Clinton crime family.

That isn't the opinion of the paper. Notice that it isn't an editorial. It is the opinion of a conservative columnist that doesn't like the Clintons.
 

Back
Top Bottom