Trump's Little Stormtroopers....

[logger]

I would be just as pissed if you called me a conservative, because I support private gun ownership and a few other "anti-lib" positions.

Labels are tools for ignorant people to avoid thinking.

Says the one who can't stand labels. Labels are tools for people to show their core values, many would like to hide from what they are.

 

[snoop_doxie]

Says the one who can't stand labels. Labels are tools for people to show their core values, many would like to hide from what they are.

Were you raised by your mother?

What label do you give to those raised by their mothers?

 

[Shalamar]

Were you raised by your mother?

What label do you give to those raised by their mothers?

logger seems to be triggered by certain labels. Like fascist. He should accept the label for what he is.

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

If a one word label can summarize your core values, I'm very sorry. Most of us get at least a bit of nuance and independent thought out of our education.

But that explains so much. Enjoy your label.

 

[logger]

I consider myself a true conservative, I am for minimal government. Trump is not a conservative, in my opinion. He is an opportunistic demagogue, a populist. I will vote for Gary Johnson, because I don't want a proto dictator as leader of my country. I would not be sad to see Trump lose to Clinton, who I could not vote for. Some true conservatives are also social conservatives or hawks, and would not vote for Johnson. Clinton as a Hawk and anti full pot legalization could get their vote.

Trump is a real Rino.

But you aren't voting for Clinton directly.

By you saying you would not be sad to see him lose to her is suspect. Everything she stands for goes against your supposed beliefs. If you mean that her election will somehow wake the country up, that might be true with Obama not her. Think of this, for the first time in your lifetime we will have a leftist court, once that happens it is truly over. Your conservatism will not have a chance once the left gets control of the court. They can completely remake this country and legislators will be able to do nothing.

 

[logger]

If a one word label can summarize your core values, I'm very sorry. Most of us get at least a bit of nuance and independent thought out of our education.

But that explains so much. Enjoy your label.

It explains much about you too.

 

[Slowvehicle]

What does the hilited part mean?

Was Trump raised by his mother?

I am missing what you are whistling at here.

It's a dog whistle for people of whom the poster feels disdain...

 

[Slowvehicle]

Phiwum I can only assume you Would realize I meant on the republican side

If you assumed I meant more than Obama, a bit of critical thought would tell you that couldn't possibly correct, then you would have realized I meant republicans, mkay

...TY for your retractions, and your "explanation".

 

[Shalamar]

It's a dog whistle for people of whom the poster feels disdain...

Which consists of everyone who does not think exactly as he does.

Hate is hate.

 

[logger]

It's a dog whistle for people of whom the poster feels disdain...

Lol

Wouldn't it be nice if we could ask the questions we would like to?

 

[Slowvehicle]

No one beats biden, his groping of women might earn him another title.

...evidence?

 

[logger]

Which consists of everyone who does not think exactly as he does.

Hate is hate.

Which would be most here, and I don't hate you, someone in deep denial doesn't deserve hate.

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

It explains much about you too.

Yes, it does: I'm overeducated for the venue.

 

[Shalamar]

Which would be most here, and I don't hate you, someone in deep denial doesn't deserve hate.

'lol' Denial about what? You know nothing about me. You do not know who I am, what I am. You are an angry ball of hate. You hate those that don't think like you. You hate those who call 'leftists', which you use as an insult against everyone.

I pity you.

 

[Slowvehicle]

Why are you concerned about the minorities not turning out?

See? This is why assuming what a poster "really meant" is a mug's game. You added a concept to the poster's words.

In context, it certainly makes you appear dishonest...

I'm willing to grant you it was a typo.

 

[acbytesla]

You do understand that people calling themselves conservative aren't always conservative?

Sure, that's always the possibility. In fact, I would argue that the so called conservative movement never has been conservative. The problem with this argument is like the question, "who is a Christian"? Who defines that? You?

Here is what conservative Charles Fried, former Solicitor General under Reagan said about his voting for Hillary. “It’s not enough to simply not support Trump, It is imperative that this man not be allowed to get anywhere near the levers of power. He must be defeated, and the only way to do that is by supporting Hillary Clinton.”

 

[Slowvehicle]

I don't need any newspaper bedding.

Inorite? All those pesky facts...

 

[Slowvehicle]

I suppose you couldn't figure out I was referring to the republican vote, as the article also states. I'll try to spell things out a little better for you next time.

Is that why you assumed you could add words to another poster's post?

 

[acbytesla]

Would you care to put a forum wager on the spread? I'll give you ten to one odds trump gets his ass waxed like a Brazilian hooker. 10 point spread, minimum, of the popular vote nationwide.

That's optimistic. I'd say 6 to 8 tops. But I would be thrilled if you were right and I was wrong.

 

[Slowvehicle]

Not usually queers, but mostly democrats.

See? I assumed you were using the dog whistle correctly (by your lights).

Thank you for your retraction.