johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Messages
- 18,821
Here's a simpler version of the logical flaw in play:
1) I found a gun in his house, therefore he's a criminal.
2) Yeah, but lots of people have guns in their houses. The gun doesn't distinguish between criminal and not.
3) Wait a moment. I found stolen goods in the house too.
4) OK, that's evidence of criminality.
5) And, don't forget, he had a gun!
Your reasoning would be valid if your analogy wasn't so poor.
The "gun" and the "stolen goods" are not completely unrelated to each other nor merely cobbled together to create an appearance of guilt.
They directly inform one another as part of a bigger picture.
