The medium did say "hospital" and she did say "equipment" but I cannot remember all the exact words of the sentence.
Again, even if I grant this, the memory bit is key. You don't remember it all; that's not me critiquing you, it's pointing out how your honesty in admitting it should inform your analysis. Not only do you not remember the exact words the medium said, what you remember right now is not the same as you remembered when you told your mom of it, and what you told your mom may or may not have been an accurate representation of what was actually said. I am sorry, but regardless how strongly you feel otherwise, your memory is simply not reliable enough to claim that this was a miraculous hit. And even if it were, the circumstances of the reading are not sufficient to rule out non-medium methods.
Scorpion said:
I no longer attend spiritualist churches and have not done so for years, So I have lost touch, and I do doubt my own beliefs. I have to keep reminding myself of what I experienced in the past to keep my faith alive.
That's progress, actually, and I mean it seriously, but it further undermines your analysis. Every time you remind yourself of what you experience you are reconstructing the memory anew; you are not rewinding the tape and reviewing a non-changing event. It is precisely what you are doing that results in what we know about memory now, i.e., that it gets rebuilt and changed every time we remember something. Maybe the changes are inconsequential, maybe not, but the intensity of the memory does not guard against them, and even inconsequential changes add up to mountains over time.
Scorpion said:
I am aware there are fake mediums,
How do you distinguish them from the real ones?
Scorpion said:
and on occasions I may have been fooled.
How do you distinguish those times from the ones you weren't fooled?
Scorpion said:
But most of the mediums that circulate the churches are genuine,
By what criteria did you come to this conclusion?
Scorpion said:
because the churches are largely run by psychic people who would not ask a fake medium to return.
How did you determine that (a) the churches are run by legitimate psychics, and (b) that genuine psychics would not ask a fake medium to come back?
More importantly, this new bit of information (that the churches are fun by psychic people) brings back the whole "Psychic Mafia" thing in spades. With that set up it would not matter if the visiting mediums ever repeat at all.
In the sense of mathematical certainty or uncertainty, it is conceivable that you ran across real mediums there, but every single aspect of what you have said is completely indistinguishable from fraud, even if some of the fraud is unintentional.