• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

2016 Presidential Debate II

If the seizures don't help there's always a Second Amendment solution. :boxedin: Seriously: you suggest Obama for Chief Justice? That would guaranteed have all of the GOP in a seizure.

(of course, there's first Scalia's vacancy to fill)
Well there's the precedent of Taft, so let Obama be chief justice.
 
Hey now, we should be used to this kind of behavior. When a person is trying to defend the indefensible, they will post nonsense.

There is evidence that they did it. It doesn't outweigh the coerced confessions, and it isn't enough for a conviction, but there is evidence.
 
He was claiming Trump's opinion was wholly unreasonable, and I was claiming that Trump's opinion was reasonable. How could you not understand this?
It is reasonable to believe that people should be in prison because the police say they are merely probably guilty?
 
Actually, it's debatable.
:rolleyes:

I think it's quite likely that her affidavit (p. 34) is a lie.
But, of course, you have no evidence for this, other than your need for it to be a lie.

...laughing about the guy being obviously guilty (in describing him passing a lie detector test) was a violation of decent human behavior.
This didn't happen as you, and the other Trumpettes, claim.

Snopes is lying in order to call something a lie.
So you've finally gone full-on conspiracy nut.
 
You apparently think the answer is obvious. Please explain, with evidence.

On May 1, 1989,Donald Trump published an ad in the New York Daily News calling for the death penalty on*five schoolchildren. None of the “Central Park Five” were older than 16
 
Last edited:
Yeah, it was totally coincidental that he bought the ad right after it happened.

*********** please.

His ad called for reinstatement of the death penalty for murder. The Central Park Five, even if guilty, did not murder anybody. Also, he is calling for reinstatement of the death penalty in order to bring law and order to the city. He is not advocating for the death penalty to be administered ex post facto.

It's truly amazing how many liberal memes are rooted in falsehoods.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom