Presidential Debates

[Shalamar]

The Sid blumenthal thread is thataway >>

'k.

 

[Fast Eddie B]

deleted

 

[Foolmewunz]

Trump was in the debate hall

That's debatable. I think he was on the mother ship and this was Donny 5, their malfunctioning clone-droid.

 

[PhantomWolf]

I didn't say anything about in this thread. I mentioned Rosie, and perhaps people who knowing that she thinks the US Government was complicit in killing thousands of people on the basis that 9/11 was the first time steel ever melted think that Hillary's opponent was a "thousand times" worse than a trurther.

Must always defend Hillary and attack her opponent!

9/11 was an inside jobby job!

/lolz.

Nice Attitude, if you don't agree with a persons opinions then you believe it is acceptable to ridicule their appearance and disparage them personally. Also that anyone that defends such personal Ad Hominem attacks must believe the same things as the person being attacked. An here I thought you considered yourself a skeptic. I guess I was wrong there because such is the antithesis of skepticism.

 

[SezMe]

I actually found it quite disturbing that he would not immediately say he would accept the election results. Did anyone else find this disturbing?

It was a foolish question. I did not find Trump's answer disturbing because one cannot rely on ANYTHING he says. If he promised on penalty of death to support HRC, there's a good possibility that tomorrow he'd go back on that promise.

 

[SezMe]

Yeah, we are sticking up for *********** truthers now.

Vomit.

Now the Shillaries have gone full truther.

Hilarious!

There types of "arguments" are going to backfire. During future campaigns you will not be able to comment negatively on the other side without being rightly held as a complete hypocrite for supporting what you do in this election.

 

[SezMe]

the company? you mean Guilianni? One of the guys she claims was in on it?

It's impossible to sham Rosie for being a truther without double shaming Trump with the same words. Logic: A mere bagatelle.

 

[SezMe]

Huh, did not realize that so many Hillary fans were truthers too until tonight.

I'm with lionking: Name 'em or withdraw the comment.

 

[cullennz]

I have a confession. My dad is a truther. He goes into deep detail when he is drunk. That is when I call my brother over and say dad wanted to say something. And giggle. Good bloke though

 

[lionking]

I have a confession. My dad is a truther. He goes into deep detail when he is drunk. That is when I call my brother over and say dad wanted to say something. And giggle. Good bloke though

Any real chance that you could occasionally post on topic?

Never mind. A hopeless thought.

 

[cullennz]

Any real chance that you could occasionally post on topic?

Never mind. A hopeless thought.

Everyone is talking about truthers and no the election

 

[lionking]

Everyone is talking about truthers and no the election

"Mum, mum, everyone else is doing it! Not fair!"

 

[cullennz]

"Mum, mum, everyone else is doing it! Not fair!"

??

The posters are talking about a tweet argument with the potential prez.

Am I supposed to ignore it?

 

[Mader Levap]

Your posts have become very childish.

When reality and facts are against you, your only and last resort is trolling, as seen here with certain ****poster.

 

[theprestige]

Are we sure he just didn't lose a connection to advisors feeding info to his ear?

Pretty sure. The debate commission has confirmed that there were problems with Trump's audio during the debate.

 

[Darat]

In the debate hall, but there is no admission that it prevented him speaking or interfered with hearing and responding to Clinton and the moderator. So no matter what the problem was it doesn't seem to be able to excuse his performance.

 

[William Parcher]

The situation inside the stadium was that the volume of his voice was lower than Clinton's but still fully audible. There was nothing wrong with his microphone.

 

[Foolmewunz]

It was a foolish question. I did not find Trump's answer disturbing because one cannot rely on ANYTHING he says. If he promised on penalty of death to support HRC, there's a good possibility that tomorrow he'd go back on that promise.

It's actually not so foolish considering it's Trump. He's directly stated in the primaries that if he wasn't given the nomination when he was leading his supporters would riot. The whole "pledge" thing was created for him in the GOP, too. Why isn't it a logical extrapolation after he's been telling the rabble that he'll only lose if it's rigged to ask if he'll accept the results.

Further, he needs to be asked if he'll accept the election night results. Some of his advisors (some people are saying) are suggesting that they have enough "evidence" to contest the results in court.

Fair question. Unfairly presented in a debate because it was truly a Trump question.

 

[William Parcher]

Trump has been telling the press that the world only heard half of his potential brilliance during the debate because half of his mind was distracted by the audio issue during the debate. He actually said that!

 

[Foolmewunz]

Trump has been telling the press that the world only heard half of his potential brilliance during the debate because half of his mind was distracted by the audio issue during the debate. He actually said that!

Yeah, instead of "Wrong!" "Wrong!" "Wrong!" It was "Wrong, poopyhead!" "Wrong, granny!" and "Wrong, crooked one!"