Hillary Clinton is Done: part 3

[Crossbow]

Everything ok?

I'm referring to what I think the public needs to know. I don't think the public needs to know every little sickness that she gets. As I said before - if it affects her performance, yes. But this didn't live up to that standard.


Obviously you need to know about every little zit she may get or if she stubbed her toe on a coffee table. Personally I find that a bit excessive, but then again I don't suffer from HDS.

Thanks much.

I tried to point out to him that a very active person in the late 60's is quite likely to have health problems. I have known several people of that age and a few of the health problems that I have often seen are: headaches, arthritis, sore knees, lethargy, poor sleeping, poor sexual performance, and on, and on, and on.

However, as long as those problems do not adversely impact the job performance, then I really do not want to hear all of those various details. Furthermore, I do not even care if the details have been photographed or not.

By the way, is Hillary Clinton done yet?

 

[Megalodon]

Wait, what?

She released the transcripts for the the speeches she gave to Goldman Sachs?

Wow, that is unbelievable!!

Yup, couldn't stop her with that one either...

 

[The Big Dog]

Yup, couldn't stop her with that one either...

that is because she did not release them, and her fanatic followers don't care that she sold her soul to the Devil (nor for how cheap she let it go)

 

[Dog Town]

Everything ok?

I'm referring to what I think the public needs to know. I don't think the public needs to know every little sickness that she gets. As I said before - if it affects her performance, yes. But this didn't live up to that standard.


Obviously you need to know about every little zit she may get or if she stubbed her toe on a coffee table. Personally I find that a bit excessive, but then again I don't suffer from HDS.

STRIKE TWO! This is too easy!

Try to follow.
No one, especially ME, claimed the highlight above!
She could not get through, speeches, and rare interaction with press, with out a coughing fit! Speculation was made & denials ensued, by many here.
Then she collapsed, more speculation as to why. The HDS sufferers here, denied any issues of it mattered. Then HRC campaign was forced to come clean! Transparency MATTERS, when it comes to obvious health issues, and other things! All of which the HRC campaign, and her followers suffering from HDS SUCK at!
HDS indeed!

SWING...batter...batter...SWING!
One strike left!

 

[The Big Dog]

Right.

we know, Armani, to the tune of $12,500.00, which she wore while giving a speech on income "inequality"

Good catch!

$12,500.00!

 

[logger]

Bombshell!

https://theconservativetreehouse.co...uy-requesting-tech-help-to-strip-vips-emails/

Here's the correct one.
https://theconservativetreehouse.co...ta-aka-stonetear-the-reddit-and-the-timeline/

 

[NoahFence]

STRIKE TWO! This is too easy!

Try to follow.
No one, especially ME, claimed the highlight above!
She could not get through, speeches, and rare interaction with press, with out a coughing fit! Speculation was made & denials ensued, by many here.
Then she collapsed, more speculation as to why. The HDS sufferers here, denied any issues of it mattered. Then HRC campaign was forced to come clean! Transparency MATTERS, when it comes to obvious health issues, and other things! All of which the HRC campaign, and her followers suffering from HDS SUCK at!
HDS indeed!

SWING...batter...batter...SWING!
One strike left!

When do we start adulting in this election cycle? Someone wake me when we do.

 

[Dog Town]

When do we start adulting in this election cycle? Someone wake me when we do.

Evasion noted!

STRIKE THREE!
Back to the dugout!

 

[The Atheist]

What a bunch of nonsense. Tell me, what are your medical credentials.

What part is nonsense? The communique from the State Department, or the fact that 'flu and colds are far more prevalent during winter?

I have no medical credentials, or any need of any - facts tend to speak for themselves.

Also, to answer your last question, you should study up on government and the role of Vice President.

I'm well aware of the responsibilities of the Veep.

I take it the method of government will be that he is never more than a step away from Hillary 24 hours a day, because if he's on holiday or in Australia, you'll be screwed when she falls over.

Here is some evidence that support your theory.

Oh god, don't do that! Evidence counts for nothing in the face of bluster and blind faith.

I thought the fact that 'flu vaccines are given at the start of winter as a good guide, but let's see if actual evidence does the trick.

 

[plague311]

we know, Armani, to the tune of $12,500.00, which she wore while giving a speech on income "inequality"

Good catch!

$12,500.00!

Since you're bringing up her clothes, we should be able to compare that to Trump. After all, he's given several speeches on inequality. What kind of suits was he wearing? Do you know? Do you give a ****** No? Because it's only a Hillary thing?

Please let me see you cry, "Tu quo que!" Even though it isn't a tu quo que at all, and you apparently have no idea what that even means. It's just a buzz word for you to say to get out of answering for your clear and blatant double standard. I'll be waiting.

*psst, don't do the "he's not the subject of the thread" thing either. It's appropriate thread drift since you're dogging on one politician, and there are two in the race at this point. It's called a comparison*

 

[phiwum]

Where did I claim to have evidence?

You do realize that a claim without evidence is also called baseless, yes?

 

[The Big Dog]

Please let me see you cry, "Tu quo que!" Even though it isn't a tu quo que at all, and you apparently have no idea what that even means. It's just a buzz word for you to say to get out of answering for your clear and blatant double standard. I'll be waiting.

Oh mercy, you know that when someone spends several lines on why his fallacy is not a tu quoque that in fact it is going to be one HELL of a tu quoque!

Plague, whether Trump does something or not, or whether I comment on Trump or not does not change the fact that Hillary wore a $12,500 Armani jacket while giving a speech on income inequality.

Changing the subject ain't gonna help either.

 

[sunmaster14]

You do realize that a claim without evidence is also called baseless, yes?

Where is your evidence?

 

[phiwum]

First of all, Trump is not officially obese. He is officially below the BMI threshold (although by a smidge). Second, how do you know that Hillary is not officially obese? Unlike Trump, she didn't release her height and weight measurements. Third, I don't know if that picture has been photoshopped or not, or from how long ago it was taken, but Hillary is most definitely obese in that picture. Putting a Hillary of that size on a beach is not good imagery for her campaign. It reminds too many of this.

A fine example of political discourse! Congrats on persuading me to vote for Trump!

Hillary looks like a beached whale! Ha ha!

 

[phiwum]

Where is your evidence?

My evidence for what?

My evidence that a claim without evidence is called baseless? If you'd like, I can provide you with that. Is this actually your question?

If not, then what are you asking me for?

 

[sunmaster14]

My evidence for what?

My evidence that a claim without evidence is called baseless? If you'd like, I can provide you with that. Is this actually your question?

If not, then what are you asking me for?

Now you know how I feel.

 

[The_Animus]

Since you're bringing up her clothes, we should be able to compare that to Trump. After all, he's given several speeches on inequality. What kind of suits was he wearing? Do you know? Do you give a ****** No? Because it's only a Hillary thing?

Please let me see you cry, "Tu quo que!" Even though it isn't a tu quo que at all, and you apparently have no idea what that even means. It's just a buzz word for you to say to get out of answering for your clear and blatant double standard. I'll be waiting.

*psst, don't do the "he's not the subject of the thread" thing either. It's appropriate thread drift since you're dogging on one politician, and there are two in the race at this point. It's called a comparison*

This is the Hillary is Done thread. Not the let's compare and contrast Trump and Clinton thread. Further no one is making a pro Trump argument regarding income inequality nor claiming that Clinton is worse on that issue than Trump.

The only thing you've done is avoid the argument by making a completely different one based on a comparison no one objected to in the first place. Given the topic of this thread you have pro-Clinton posters and anti-Clinton posters in this thread. Most of the pro-Clinton and many of the anti-Clinton posters are also Anti-Trump.

The expectation that they post Anti-Trump stuff to the anti-Trump/Pro-Clinton people in a Clinton thread is just bizarre.

I'm anti-trump and anti-clinton, and even though I'm actually more anti-trump than anti-clinton I post almost nothing about Trump and much negative stuff about Clinton. Why? Because I've completely written off Trump as a 100% joke, and I've generally written off the people who support him as well. I'm not disappointed in them because I have such low expectations of them and any attempt to convince them otherwise is likely a waste of time and so is posting anti-Trump stuff to anti-Trump posters.

I do have higher expectations of those on the left, both who do and do not support Clinton. Personally I feel she is a terrible candidate, and posting negative stuff serves two purposes. First it gets pro-Clinton arguments which I like to read and evaluate in case I find it convincing enough to change my view. Granted this is rarely the case but that's just the way people are. Second, it might just make someone who is pro-Clinton reevaluate her as well.

I've explained this more than once but it's repeatedly ignored and the "You're a secret Trump supporter", "Trump does it too, and worse!", and "Why don't you ever complain about Trump" arguments are in every page of every thread here.

This election has really made me sick to death of the biased partisanship on both sides.

 

[Dog Town]

...and many of the anti-Clinton posters are also Anti-Trump...

Hard to get this through the hero worship!
But, soooo TRUE!

 

[Foolmewunz]

Oh mercy, you know that when someone spends several lines on why his fallacy is not a tu quoque that in fact it is going to be one HELL of a tu quoque!

Plague, whether Trump does something or not, or whether I comment on Trump or not does not change the fact that Hillary wore a $12,500 Armani jacket while giving a speech on income inequality.

Changing the subject ain't gonna help either.

Do you repeat any lie you read on Hang The Bitch Dot Com?

Do some research.

 

[Foolmewunz]

Hard to get this through the hero worship!
But, soooo TRUE!

.... but are just too busy Hillary-Hatin' to find time to express any problems with Trump?

Explain.