The facts doesn't matter to logger.
If Trump somehow loses and the dems take the senate, you think hillary isn't going to do anything with guns?
The facts doesn't matter to logger.
If Trump somehow loses and the dems take the senate, you think hillary isn't going to do anything with guns?

If Trump somehow loses and the dems take the senate, you think hillary isn't going to do anything with guns?
I have to wonder if Trump has ever heard of the case NY Times v Sullivan?
Clearly sexual frustration.You know you are worried when you start dreaming about Trump...
And what better place to discuss dream interpretation than a forum where most members think dreams are meaningless!
So...my dream this morning, in which I was a passive observer and non participant:
President (I guess this is a prophetic dream..) Trump is visiting this prison in some foreign country (Syria??) because his two sons are imprisoned there for war crimes. A band of inmates kidnap him and are complaining to him about their treatment (torture) at the hands of jail guards. They refer to him using the epithet "Billionaire!" He responds, "I know, I hired one of them!"
Then, one of the guards, who is in cahoots with the inmates, and is apparently George W Bush, seizes Trump and begins to carry him down a long tunnel into the bowels of the prison. Trump seizes the opportunity and reaches upward to grab a ceiling panel. He uses the panel to knock Bush to the ground--then, he does a handstand (which he has been practicing for months) on the panel to increase the downwards force on Bush, who then suffocates and dies...
Unfortunately, this is when I woke up...
Discuss!![]()
Why is it difficult for you to understand you don't agree to rules that restrict your argument. That is hilarious. Liberals are always trying to stack the deck in their favor.
Debate rules ALWAYS restrict your argument. That's the point.
And of course all the libs run ut and say she won't. Everyone knows she will ban some while severely restrictions others. She'd never admit to it being the known liar she is.
My lawyers want to sue the failing @nytimes so badly for irresponsible intent. I said no (for now),...
Just like Obama did.
Did the story of "the boy who cried wolf" seem meaningless to you?
No. Never could get it through the House.
I like the idea that both participants in the debate being bound by the same rules is somehow an advantage for "the liberal". I wonder what logger thinks that says about the conservative participant's ability or knowledge.
What a ludicrous tweet, lawyers don't ring up out of the blue and tell their clients that the lawyers want to sue!
Now it's "anything"? Does this mean you agree her stormtroopers won't be kicking down your doors in the middle of the night to grab your guns?If Trump somehow loses and the dems take the senate, you think hillary isn't going to do anything with guns?
Well if there is one thing Trump is an expert on it is running failing businesses!Why do I get the feeling that it's the other way around? "Um, sir? There's this little thing called Freedom of the Press."
And why is it taking so long for the failing NYT to go belly up? It's like those "Going Out of Business" sales that go on for years.
Steve S
No it wouldn't gun control legislation and enactment in countries like the UK is not a left/right issue.I wouldn't be proud of that if I was a liberal. If American liberalism doesn't want to take guns, or elect a president that does, that would mean the American left is to the right of European or Australian moderates. That is embarrassing. I would be ashamed to have my candidate in public.
That's because you don't remember the history of it. Many dropped the issue but there were folks who thought it was and is a fake.
I think we all know this is in the "NFL sent me a letter" ("No, we didn't") category of Trumpian invention. Even logger must think it's fake.What a ludicrous tweet, lawyers don't ring up out of the blue and tell their clients that the lawyers want to sue!