• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Yet to be disproven AFAIK

I love how you put the isolated periods above and below your text. It's like art. No, it is art. I can't even focus on the profound message that is contained within because the artistry has taken control of me. Bravo my dear man.
 
Bubba;11485361[URL="http://thespiritscience.net/2015/12/13/http://thespiritscience.net/2015/12/13/this-telepathic-child-was-tested-by-scientists-and-the-results-will-amaze-you/" said:
Telepathic child tested by scientists. [/URL]
Click to expand...

Do you really believe every clickbait you click on?

"Yet to be disproven AFAIK"
Click to expand...

Shifting the burden of proof. Before you expect serious attention you need to have a more reliable source than fourth-hand, year-old clickbait.
 
Last edited:
I believe Dr. Diane Powell's work with savant children has already been discussed on this forum:
Lukas1986 said:
Here is Dr. Diane Powell who claims she will go after the James Randi Prize:



Taken from: http://www.presidentialufo.com/comp...ticles-a-papers/546-a-nobel-prize-for-woo-woo

Her research, tests and results in a abstract. This is all I could find:



Taken from: http://www.parapsych.org/uploaded_f..._convention_abstracts_of_presented_papers.pdf
Pages: 25-26 in the pdf.

Tell me what you think of it. I am also skeptical of it but I would like to know your opinions on this. Thanks.
Click to expand...
 
by J U

Do you really believe every clickbait you click on?
Click to expand...


Of course not, silly boo boo.

You may recall my friend who knew I was having eggplant for dinner that night a couple yrs back 3K miles away. I did not even ask her. She says its routine for her. I know she abhors lying. Her friends/family say its routine with her. How many anectodes like that ?

Can you dismiss them?
 
William Parcher said:
I love how you put the isolated periods above and below your text. It's like art. No, it is art. I can't even focus on the profound message that is contained within because the artistry has taken control of me. Bravo my dear man.
Click to expand...


Bingo. Art. Good one. I may refrain now that you can visualize it.

You may as well wish to note....
Since a Certain Great Almighty All Knowing Psychic Smarty Pants Magic Wizard, (pathetically desperately) accused me of lying for editing spacing/punctuating, a gate opened and more bigotry has reared its ugly head.

Ideologies will clash.

Other deranged bigoted smarty pants of the universe seemed determined to carry on bashing nonetheless
.
 
John Jones said:
Let me guess: You are Just Asking Questions.

Your claim, your burden of proof.Your surrogate's claim, his burden of proof.
Click to expand...

No claim was made.


Why must you pretend a claim was made?

Really Mr Jones. Think on that.
You kinda flew off the handle there.
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
Why must you pretend a claim was made?
Click to expand...

No pretense necessary. It was the indirectly stated premise of your post. You can't say "if true" without establishing a premise. The fact that you phrase your posts in such a way as to put the cart before the horse doesn't relieve the premise. You're really not as clever a troll as you think you are. "Converting the conditional" was a thing long before you were born.
 
Edited by kmortis: 
Removed to comply with Rule 12 and Rule 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bubba said:
Of course not, silly boo boo.

You may recall my friend who knew I was having eggplant for dinner that night a couple yrs back 3K miles away. I did not even ask her. She says its routine for her. I know she abhors lying. Her friends/family say its routine with her. How many anectodes like that ?

Can you dismiss them?
Click to expand...

Without any evidence? Surely.

Just like 'Squatch; just like the crucifiction.
 
JayUtah said:
No pretense necessary. It was the indirectly stated premise of your post. You can't say "if true" without establishing a premise. The fact that you phrase your posts in such a way as to put the cart before the horse doesn't relieve the premise. You're really not as clever a troll as you think you are. "Converting the conditional" was a thing long before you were born.
Click to expand...

QFT, since I could not have said it this well.
 
You can't say "if true" without establishing a premise.
Click to expand...

Grip: Premise is in OP video and it is not my premise. Its just a video.

Discuss. Debunk. Ignore. Your call.


:wackygoofy:
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
Grip: Premise is in OP video...
Click to expand...

Nope. You invited discussion based on the premise that the claim in the link was true. The premise for the discussion here is yours. Further you claimed the video had not been disproven, in the title.

And as usual, you don't care one whit about the actual claim you've reported. At least you haven't posted at all about it. All your posts in this thread following the original are your all-too-predictable gloating over having once more trolled the forum. How childish.
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
Of course not, silly boo boo.

You may recall my friend who knew I was having eggplant for dinner that night a couple yrs back 3K miles away. I did not even ask her. She says its routine for her. I know she abhors lying. Her friends/family say its routine with her. How many anectodes like that ?
Can you dismiss them?
Click to expand...

All anecdotes lacking real proof are dismissable. I am sure even you can figure out why!!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom