Hillary Clinton is Done: part 3

[Skeptic Ginger]

Pretty sure, "we can keep Iraq's oil" plays to a fairly small audience.

 

[Bob001]

Bill and Hillary have been a busy couple:

Between the two of them, Bill and Hillary Clinton have reported earning more than $235 million since leaving the White House.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...62_story.html?utm_term=.6f89d9703ce3#comments

That would include 12 years when Hillary was a U.S. Senator and Secretary of State. It's just not unreasonable to ask where the money came from and what they did for it.

 

[Darat]

Have a look at her tax returns?

 

[caveman1917]

Brilliant analysis. Killary seems to have a weak spot there indeed. *cough cough*

*cough*

*cough cough cough cough*

Sick or not, the coughing is quite annoying. That quick succession of anticipatory excitement with disappointment when it turns out she didn't just drop dead is pretty taxing.

 

[Belz...]

So, you're saying Hillary is a lesbian.

Bisexual, actually.

 

[Childlike Empress]

It's like his claim, that the Chinese didn't respect Obama because of the plane stairs incident. In reality it had nothing to do with Obama, but rather who got to drive the stairs and that the local driver the Chinese wanted couldn't speak English and so deal with the White House Staffers. But he can put it out that "Oh the Chinese don't respect Obama and we know this because they refused to give him any stairs to get off the plane." Nice sound bite, totally incorrect, but it plays well.

LOL. You really bought that?

 

[The Great Zaganza]

LOL. You really bought that?

Of course it was a targeted insult, a gesture of superiority.

However, it was also entirely for domestic consumption and as payback for US presence in the South China Sea: it's a clear sign that Obama's strategy is frustrating the Chinese.

 

[Upchurch]

It's a little weird that you should be so impressed by such a massive strawman argument.

What exactly is the strawman argument, oh knowledgable and experienced critical thinker?

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

This thought occurred to me—and pardon me if it's already been brought up; I haven't been following this thread:

Some (many?) of Clinton's detractors imply that her lack of indictment over various activities shows a rather incredible level of control/influence over various aspects of the government, bending them to her will.

Isn't this one of the qualities that Trump claims he'll bring to the presidency, getting the government (anyone, really) to do exactly what he wants?

So we have the unproven claim of Trump's ability, and the supposedly proven fact of Clinton's ability. Yet, Trump is admired for this unproven quality and the same quality in Clinton is perceived as the epitome of corruption.

Weird.

 

[Childlike Empress]

^ Well, without going into details of your thought there, Trump claims to want to change the "rigged" system and to be able to because he knows how it works, while Killary pretends everything is just *cough* fine.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

^ Well, without going into details of your thought there, Trump claims to want to change the "rigged" system and to be able to because he knows how it works...

Except that, if it is rigged, he won't get elected. And if he does get elected, that goes against his claims of the system being rigged.

Also, that doesn't address the non-detail of Clinton already possessing and displaying a power that Trump claims he has. The best argument you have is, "Trump would use his powers for good," but that's such obvious nonsense.

 

[Childlike Empress]

Except that, if it is rigged, he won't get elected. And if he does get elected, that goes against his claims of the system being rigged.

Also, that doesn't address the non-detail of Clinton already possessing and displaying a power that Trump claims he has. The best argument you have is, "Trump would use his powers for good," but that's such obvious nonsense.

There are degrees of "riggage". Massive election fraud is quite extreme on the scale and might be dangerous to pull off (while getting away with subtle election fraud is no problem as this century has shown). Also, your "non-detail" kind of proves that she is lying about everything being fine already, if you don't want to engage in three apes delusions, which I'm sure you don't, right? While we still have the option of giving Teh Donald the benefit of the doubt.

 

[NoahFence]

Donald has done nothing to earn the benefit of the doubt.

 

[Belz...]

LOL. You really bought that?

Irony!

 

[Childlike Empress]

Irony!

Gesundheit!

 

[Belz...]

I see that that word isn't in your dictionary.

 

[Childlike Empress]

I see that that word isn't in your dictionary.

Irony would be when I would claim to be surprised to see you sitting in a glasshouse throwing stones. Not irony would be your act of sitting in a glasshouse throwing stones.

 

[Belz...]

Irony would be when I would claim to be surprised to see you sitting in a glasshouse throwing stones. Not irony would be your act of sitting in a glasshouse throwing stones.

Weren't you the one throwing stones just about now, and me pointing it out?

 

[Dr. Keith]

Bill and Hillary have been a busy couple:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...62_story.html?utm_term=.6f89d9703ce3#comments

That would include 12 years when Hillary was a U.S. Senator and Secretary of State. It's just not unreasonable to ask where the money came from and what they did for it.

Have a look at her tax returns?

And you can look at all of them, which is kinda nice.

 

[Childlike Empress]

Weren't you the one throwing stones just about now, and me pointing it out?

Actually not, but I understood that this was your perception (or more exactly a knee-jerk reaction trying to "win" one over me by reminding everybody of how I buy all kinds of silly stuff, right?). Even if it had been so, it wouldn't have been irony. So it was your glasshouse, and now you sit with shards all over you. To everybody's surprise (<--- irony).