I agree but if you look at their policy ideas, you quickly realize they can't win with them so here we are.
Who is "their"? Republicans? Both candidates?
I agree but if you look at their policy ideas, you quickly realize they can't win with them so here we are.
No. She has been accused of treason and murder.
She has been cleared investigation after investigation.
Edit and she was endorsed by the newspaper that hasn't' endorsed one in many many years.
So yeah, impressed is a great rational response.
So? Some people think that she's an alien or a robot. How is that relevant at all to an argument that she is a better choice than Trump?
So?
False. Deciding not to indict somebody is not the same as "clearing" .
I swear, you and so many others label arguments as strawman. But it's clear you and many of them don't know what the term means.It's a little weird that you should be so impressed by such a massive strawman argument.
False. Deciding not to indict somebody is not the same as "clearing" her.
I swear, you and so many others label arguments as strawman. But it's clear you and many of them don't know what the term means.
There were no criminal charges. There are no criminal charges.
So?
Guilty until proven guilty... that's the American way.
I suppose the presumption of inocence only applies to old orange males tha funneled money into the election of AGs that dropped cases against them.
And what?
And oddly the same people who are so sure there must be something criminal going on with Clinton just shrug and ignore the fact that Trump is on trial for fraud, and as you point out Megalodon appears to have bribed his way out of facing charges in one state.
In the Washington Post:
Hillary Clinton fails the ABCs of handling classified information
That's pretty bad. Still, she's the only person standing between the Cheeto Fuhrer and the presidency, so what can you do?
It's a little weird that you should be so impressed by such a massive strawman argument.
HDS can go both ways.
One place that Donald certainly has the upper hand is in that he is able to control soundbites well.
I don't know. On the one hand he's a good ********ter, on the other hand, it's interspersed with some outrageous ignorance.One place that Donald certainly has the upper hand is in that he is able to control soundbites well. There is a saying that if you have to explain, you have already lost.
Sadly this is the trouble when you have a person that has indepth knowledge and understanding vs someone who believes that policy should be tweetable. We find the same thing in Conspiracy Theories where the claims can be thrown out in 1-2 seconds, but to explain why they are wrong can take 10-15 minutes of explanation.
Trump has the advantage that he can toss out a sound bite, but to rebut it takes 5 minutes or more.
Could be an issue in the coming debates.
I don't know. On the one hand he's a good ********ter, on the other hand, it's interspersed with some outrageous ignorance.