• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Theory of Relativity will begin to fall apart in 2016/2017

Status
Not open for further replies.
dasmiller said:
Bjarne, in your quest for a polar-orbiting spacecraft, have you looked into Ulysses? It's in a near-polar orbit around the sun, roughly at the same radius as Jupiter, so rather than orbit into the 'dark flow' for maybe an hour at a time like ISS, Ulysses would have been fighting (or being pushed by?) the 'dark flow' for a full 3 years before it finally switched direction relative to the dark flow.

And yet I find no reference to a "Ulysses anomaly."
Click to expand...

The mission is not GR/SR test, and it is also not a flyby probe.
 
Bjarne said:
Notice that length contractions not is a consequence of SR or GR, it is a consequence of the Lorentz equation
Length contraction was known in the late 1800.

So Einstein begun to speculate and constructed a theory based on the already known mysterious Lorenz Equations, .
The fact is that the so called "curvature of space" aspect is never proven to be correct,. It was and is still nothing but speculation. – I am not saying this to provoke anybody, but only because this is a fact.

The curvature of space concept is only an attempt to try to solve mysterious consequences of Lorentz equation. Nothing more than this

I think you are unaware of the fact that time dilation also already was a consequence of the Lorenz equation, even before the theory of relativity.

Einstein believed his speculation could explain what really happen – in the real world – to achieve that he invented, - the so-called, - "curvature space".
He combined the 2 already known distance and time dilemma and invented “space-time”..
Again... the distortion of time and distance was known 25 years before his theory, therefore Einstein did not have any kind of patent, trying to explain this fact.

Dear dear dear “The man” – and other man and beast,........ a stretching space theory is also build on the Lorentz equation, and also build on the same time-distance distortion, - it also include length contraction, and time dilation.

The only difference is only WHAT SPACE REALLY DOES

The consequences based on a modified theory of relativity (MTR) based on stretching space, - compared to the and the well-known curvature concept is….. that MTR....

  • Is logic digestible, especially for unspoiled students.
  • It build on a NONE schizophrenic and therefore none insane worldview.
  • It is not causing any HUGE conflict with quantum physic,
  • It is not causing problems with other aspect of science such as so called black holes.
  • It is not claiming that gravitational lensing; MUST exist (which now is denied by a high ranging NASA astrophysicist that claims such is never detected.
  • It allow a simple and natural explanation, what dark energy really is, - just the opposite, - release of stretching space.
  • It even explains why so called dark energy (release of gravity) is “”accelerating””
  • It makes it possible to connect space to the strong nuclear interaction.
  • It makes it possible to understand gravity as a side effect of the strong force and therefore united
  • It can explain the perihelion anomaly only based on Newtonian classic physic.
  • It reveals that NASA have swept the pioneer anomaly under the blanket.
  • It clear and simple explain why space probes are accelerating when approaching close to the Earth
  • It can predict a SR – ISS test anomaly
  • It can predict and prove that Dark Flow is true.
  • And my friend it opens the universe to you in many many other ways, you and many fools are not willing to understand for no reason compared to the HUGE amount of problems connected to the prevailing understanding..
Click to expand...
Typing (or C&P-ing) a new and better formatted wall of nonsense doesn't change the fact that it is nonsense.
 
dasmiller said:
Pioneer wasn't a GR/SR test, either.
Click to expand...

The theory predict 3 different space probe anomalies

  1. SR , - time dilation, different as expected when flying oppesite dark flow. (ISS)
  2. SR, - deceleration in these cases GR get to weak to counteract the SR influence, which mean for example when leaving the sun / solar system. (Pioneer)
  3. GR - accelerating, due to shorter relativistic radius, and therefore classic increase of acceleration due to gravity, which mean larger speed as expected (shorter radius distance is due to proportional stretch of time/ruler/space) (caused by elastic space absorbing matter) - (Flyby probes and perihelion precession) ...
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
Space is stretching towards matter, not curved around matter
Click to expand...

How about here?:
http://old.world-mysteries.com/newgw/sci_27.htm, "Space Vacuum Theory".
Is "Space Vacuum Theory" written by you? Your name as the author appears below this tearjerkingly idiotic piece.
It mentions curving space as an existing aspect many times though.

So, Bjarne, you believe curving space exists after all?
 
Daylightstar said:
How about here?:
http://old.world-mysteries.com/newgw/sci_27.htm, "Space Vacuum Theory".
Is "Space Vacuum Theory" written by you? Your name as the author appears below this tearjerkingly idiotic piece.
It mentions curving space as an existing aspect many times though.

So, Bjarne, you believe curving space exists after all?
Click to expand...

This was the first thought 8 years ago, a lot have happen since then
The biggest mistake is that I too was brainwashed, I believed in GR and also that GR can go mad in the center of a gravitational field, because this is what the math say. But today i see it was nothing but fanatic indoctrinated religion..

Its only 2 - 3 month ago that I better understood the perihelion anomali of Mercuries orbit.. - Little by little the theory leads me out of darkness. First within the last 3 month 100 % of the collective brainwash have left me.
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
This was the first thought 8 years ago, a lot have happen since then
Click to expand...
Daylightstar said:
How about here?:
http://old.world-mysteries.com/newgw/sci_27.htm, "Space Vacuum Theory".
Is "Space Vacuum Theory" written by you? Your name as the author appears below this tearjerkingly idiotic piece.
It mentions curving space as an existing aspect many times though.

So, Bjarne, you believe curving space exists after all?
Click to expand...

http://old.world-mysteries.com/newgw/sci_27.htm:
... The known curvature of the space, a law of nature functioning alike curvature of space around atomic or molecular worlds; space curving around single atoms, creating Space Vacuum.

All it does is simply emphasize the fantastical nature of your self-contradictory thoughts and the necessity to simply dismiss all of it.
 
Last edited:
Daylightstar said:
http://old.world-mysteries.com/newgw/sci_27.htm:
... The known curvature of the space, a law of nature functioning alike curvature of space around atomic or molecular worlds; space curving around single atoms, creating Space Vacuum.

All it does is simply emphasize the fantastical nature of your self-contradictory thoughts and the necessity to simply dismiss all of it.
Click to expand...

Like you my comrade
You too believed in that nonsense (fantasy)and still does so..
 
Daylightstar said:
You are blinded by self-contradictory useless fantasies.
Click to expand...

True because self-contradictory is what the GR-schizophrenic world view is about.. if you first is out on the other side again you can see how insane deep you had sunk.
 
Bjarne said:
True because self-contradictory is what the GR-schizophrenic world view is about.. if you first is out on the other side again you can see how insane deep you had sunk.
Click to expand...

Each of your ideas itself is internally self-contradictory, simply relying on the baselessly assumed truth of the author's beliefs, no matter how those beliefs morph into the most fundamental contradictions possible.
 
Look at your internet presence, the self-contradictory beliefs and ideas morphing baselesly into other self-contradictory beliefs and ideas.
The meaningless references to (non existent) mathematical treatments.

The "independentacademia.edu" page under astophysics.
Your "Linkedin" page, presenting as Cosmology, Relativity,and Gravity.

One look and it's immediately obvious it can not be taken seriously.
 
Last edited:
Daylightstar said:
Each of your ideas itself is internally self-contradictory, simply relying on the baselessly assumed truth of the author's beliefs, no matter how those beliefs morph into the most fundamental contradictions possible.
Click to expand...

No it is a process, for example the earth cannot be flat and round at the same time can it ?
Why are you not sweeping by your own door first ?
You too was and is still a victim for the GR-schizophrenic world view
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
No it is a process, for example the earth cannot be flat and round at the same time can it ?
Why are you not sweeping by your own door first ?
You too was and is still a victim for GR
Click to expand...

No, it's explicitly not a process. It is just self-contradictory beliefs and ideas morphing baselesly into other self-contradictory beliefs and ideas.

No actual process can be observed in your self-contradictory morphs.
In fact, it appears nearly random.
 
Bjarne said:
No it is a process, for example the earth cannot be flat and round at the same time can it ?
Why are you not sweeping by your own door first ?
You too was and is still a victim for the GR-schizophrenic world view
Click to expand...

I don't subscribe to the self-contradictory ideas of half witted self proclaimed internet professors who think they'll change the face of science.
I'll take proper data and actual mathematical underpinning: actual evidence, any day over the monomaniacal ramblings of said 'internet professors'.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom