Power
To do what?
Power
To do what?
as opposed to the actual horror show for which the Clinton's are responsible and that is the subject of the thread.
I've said it before Hillary is in it for the long con, and it is laughable that someone who championed welfare reform and the superpredator law is calling someone else rfacist.
own it Hillary.
For its own sake.
For its own sake.
Okay, now you're in kyoon's department.
What is a kyoon and what does that have to do with a desire for power??
The Long Con? What a joke. You mean Hillary was planning this when she was 16? What do you call Trump's scams on Trump University Students or his use of debt to force his vendors to accept less then their contracted bill?
Other than a single comment 20 years and a welfare reform bill of her husband's, you can't name anything can you?
FYI:
The Welfare Reform Act of 1996.
The bill was a cornerstone of the Republican Contract with America and was introduced by Rep. E. Clay Shaw, Jr. (R-FL-22). President Bill Clinton signed PRWORA into law on August 22, 1996, fulfilling his 1992 campaign promise to "end welfare as we have come to know it".[1]
This was the third welfare reform bill that landed on Bill Clinton's desk during his first term. Clinton VETOED the first two. Only 5 Republicans out 287 voted against the bill whereas 57 Democrats out of 238 voted for it.
Clinton was not happy with the bill believing it to be too conservative, but also believed that he would not be able to veto a third bill considering it was one of his campaign promises
FYI: Hillary had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with any of the details of that bill. ZERO...ZIP...ZILCH. It was written by Republicans and introduced by the GOP and Bill Clinton signed it in 1996. Newt Gingrich, Trump's advisor was the major force in the passage of that bill.
Certainly not the racist!
Plus I am on record as stating I will never vote for anyone who voted for the Iraq War resolution, so Kaine and Unable are out of the picture.
But this thread isn't about me.
I could come up with a far longer list than those of offensive things she's said about black people, in general or in particular - *and* I still am not satisfied with her current platform.
And having said that, the notion that somehow voting for a white nationalist like Trump is an answer is absolutely ridiculous.
Whatever, I'm off to twitter looking for some images making fun of Killary.![]()
HRC is by no means perfect, but her work for and with African Americans is very good. Has she said certain things that outside of the context of who this woman has PROVEN herself to be could be construed negative towards African Americans? Sure. But Hillary has more than proven herself to not being bigoted.
Funny, it would seem the Black Caucus at the time didn't think it was racist. I don't recall any big calls about Clinton's racism at the time. In fact, the Clintons remained popular among blacks at the time and in the primary.I'm not so sure - I can think of quite a few comments back in 08 that I, and many other black Americans, took offense to (I won't burden her with, say, Geraldine Ferraro's far worse comments, since Ferraro ended up getting cut off). Putting all that aside, I'm more concerned about policy than her personal beliefs and feelings, and my major concern is police reform, and I'd like to see a day 1 plan on it. And simply taking a page from Sanders' "I marched with King!" strategy won't cut it.
But one thing I will grant her is that, in her last major speech, she cut through the garbage about how Trump was "reaching out to black Americans" (he is not), and gave a good, though not exhaustive, argument for what he actually is - namely, a white nationalist who cares nothing for black Americans, or any other non-white group. That may come in handy in the future.
Many black leaders saw the notoriously harsh law as an imperfect solution to unbearable levels of urban crime.
Clinton compromised to get legislation passed and now the side demanding the compromise is blaming the people that gave in to their demands.Black support for anti-crime legislation was highlighted, while black criticism of the specific legislation was tuned out. The caucus threatened to stall the bill, but lawmakers scrapped the Racial Justice Act when Republicans promised to filibuster any legislation that adopted its measures.
In final negotiations, Democratic leadership yielded to Republicans demanding that prevention (or “welfare for criminals” as one called it) be sliced in exchange for their votes.
Funny, it would seem the Black Caucus at the time didn't think it was racist. I don't recall any big calls about Clinton's racism at the time. In fact, the Clintons remained popular among blacks at the time and in the primary.
Analysis: Black Leaders Supported Clinton's Crime Bill
Black Americans Supported the 1994 Crime Bill, Too
Did Blacks Really Endorse the 1994 Crime Bill?
Clinton compromised to get legislation passed and now the side demanding the compromise is blaming the people that gave in to their demands.
"But back in 1994, Hillary called some black kids superpredators!"
And she was wrong.
Wasn't she instead refering to a specific subgroup of black people?
I'm not so sure - I can think of quite a few comments back in 08 that I, and many other black Americans, took offense to (I won't burden her with, say, Geraldine Ferraro's far worse comments, since Ferraro ended up getting cut off). Putting all that aside, I'm more concerned about policy than her personal beliefs and feelings, and my major concern is police reform, and I'd like to see a day 1 plan on it. And simply taking a page from Sanders' "I marched with King!" strategy won't cut it.
But one thing I will grant her is that, in her last major speech, she cut through the garbage about how Trump was "reaching out to black Americans" (he is not), and gave a good, though not exhaustive, argument for what he actually is - namely, a white nationalist who cares nothing for black Americans, or any other non-white group. That may come in handy in the future.
I always wonder why people are so fixated on comments she makes. She's a politician, she'll say anything if it helps her. Things like the welfare reform bill actually kill black Americans. Being spoken to nice and non-offensively while being killed in an underhanded, almost invisible, way is not my idea of liberation.
And yes, I know that this bill was signed off by her husband - but does anyone really believe that she wouldn't have if it were her decision?