• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Hillary Clinton is Done: part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Even if they were, the FBI had them. And yet, the FBI did not recommend charges.

So what is the big deal?

There is no big deal. It's a bunch of people trying to smear Clinton at every opportunity. The good news is in choosing the sleaziest most dishonest candidate in history nobody is going to give a damn about a bunch of emails that offer nothing.
 
Well yes, to rational people. But quite a lot of Clinton's critics are anything but rational.

Which was my point in asking people to articulate the reason a server was worse than a service.

Telling us Clinton's critics aren't rational still leaves the issue unanswered. What makes for the increased outrage over it being [OMG, wait for it] a private server in her home?
 
It's very telling the Republicans know they can't win the POTUS election so they need to keep pursuing more and more witch-hunts.

And the news media loves to feed the masses. As I channel surf searching for some actual news, every hour, or half hour on all three main TV news channels they've repeated Trump's call for a special prosecutor. Only once in all that time (sure I missed some of it) did anyone say: Bono didn't need to donate to the Clinton Foundation in order to contact the Secretary of State, and the Saudi guy actually went through proper channels. None of these people got anything special following the supposedly incriminating pay to play emails.

And Trumpers think the media is biased in favor of Clinton.
 
Last edited:
Even if they were, the FBI had them. And yet, the FBI did not recommend charges.

So what is the big deal?

her sneering disregard for transparency and the fact she lied about the emails constantly and avidly, of course.

Cripes, the fact that she has not been indicted over this is setting the bar so low that I am amazed that people even bring it up.

Oh well, shillaries gonna shill
 
There is no big deal. It's a bunch of people trying to smear Clinton at every opportunity. The good news is in choosing the sleaziest most dishonest candidate in history nobody is going to give a damn about a bunch of emails that offer nothing.

Definitely shot themselves in the foot this time. :p
 
OMG. :sdl:

Stein can't break 5%. Johnson can't break 10%. And you think pointing that out is a self-fulfilling prophecy?

Feel free to provide an argument otherwise. Do you know what a self-fulfilling prophecy is? For example, when large groups of voters choose to vote for either Clinton or Trump, even though they might not be their first choices, because they believe those two to be the only "realistic choices" based on a large groups of voters voting either Clinton or Trump rather than doing something else.
 
No that is not what any of the articles nor the FBI say.

yes that is exactly what the WaPo article and State's lawyer said.

Disk 1: 14,900 from Hillary's servers and other devices
disk 2: classified docs
disk 3 the docs previously turned over to state
additional disks, other people accounts and etc.

although, I do like the idea that the 14,900 is IN ADDITION to the ones Hillary admitted destroying.
 
yes that is exactly what the WaPo article and State's lawyer said.

Disk 1: 14,900 from Hillary's servers and other devices
disk 2: classified docs
disk 3 the docs previously turned over to state
additional disks, other people accounts and etc.

although, I do like the idea that the 14,900 is IN ADDITION to the ones Hillary admitted destroying.

Why doesn't someone just link to the relevant information so we can know who's in the right, here? You know, rather than just nay-say one another?
 
Feel free to provide an argument otherwise. Do you know what a self-fulfilling prophecy is? For example, when large groups of voters choose to vote for either Clinton or Trump, even though they might not be their first choices, because they believe those two to be the only "realistic choices" based on a large groups of voters voting either Clinton or Trump rather than doing something else.

Stein can't break 5%. Johnson can't break 10%

That you don't get it, or just don't want to does not change anything.
 
yes that is exactly what the WaPo article and State's lawyer said.

Disk 1: 14,900 from Hillary's servers and other devicesdisk 2: classified docs
disk 3 the docs previously turned over to state
additional disks, other people accounts and etc.
although, I do like the idea that the 14,900 is IN ADDITION to the ones Hillary admitted destroying.

It is good to see you now no longer claim that these 14900 emails were from Clinton's server. I wonder why you stopped at disk 3, rather than listing what disk 4, disk 5, disk 6, disk 7, and disk 8 contained. You did previously claim that all 8 contained email to and from Clinton, without ever admitting to be wrong.
 
Feel free to provide an argument otherwise. Do you know what a self-fulfilling prophecy is? For example, when large groups of voters choose to vote for either Clinton or Trump, even though they might not be their first choices, because they believe those two to be the only "realistic choices" based on a large groups of voters voting either Clinton or Trump rather than doing something else.

Feel free to provide evidence that the 86% of the voters who are picking Clinton or Trump had another candidate as their first choice.
 
Definitely shot themselves in the foot this time. :p

I do find it amusing that they're trying. Trump, who can't get through a paragraph without lying about something and they are questioning Hillary's honesty? What a joke. The guy who said he was self funding his campaign, (he wasn't) the guy who cheated thousands of students out of their money. A guy who constantly reneges on agreements and just decides after the fact that he's paid enough. And yet they keep asking Hillary about an IT decision.

:confused:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom