dudalb
Penultimate Amazing
And it would be. But they can say he made it clear they had to. They had to sabotage his candidacy to prevent a disaster.
I am beginning to think the GOP only has a choice of disasters.
And it would be. But they can say he made it clear they had to. They had to sabotage his candidacy to prevent a disaster.
You're welcome. I didn't know either (but it's not my ConstitutionOh, the House votes someone from the top three. Thanks for posting that.
Not quite, IMHO. Johnson is socially liberal, while McMullen wants to appeal to the socially conservative crowd.I really think that in the end this won't amount to much,because Johnson already has occupied the niche that McMullen wants.
And it would be. But they can say he made it clear they had to. They had to sabotage his candidacy to prevent a disaster.
Yup. For the R's at this point, there's no right answer. And I feel SO sorry for them.I am beginning to think the GOP only has a choice of disasters.
Not quite, IMHO. Johnson is socially liberal, while McMullen wants to appeal to the socially conservative crowd.
There's more than just the presidency at stake for the Republicans.
Yep. You're not going to vote for a candidate who wants to uphold Roe vs. Wade, are you?Which is important for those seeking purity with their vote. "I can hold my head high because I voted for the only real social conservative on the ballot."
The Utah strategy for McMullen:
1) Win Utah. Get on the ballot there and do nothing but campaign there. This is plausible. He's a Mormon, Trump is not liked in Utah, etc.
2) Hope that removing those EC votes from the Clinton/Trump total allows for neither to win a majority. Unlikely, but remotely possible.
3) Hope that the GOP controlled house chooses McMullen over Trump. Again, plausible.
This is all very unlikely to happen, but there is a theoretical path to a McMullen presidency even if he only contests one or two states...