• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Wikileaks DNC leak proves primary was rigged /DNC planned to use Sanders' religion ag

16.5 said:
Oops! You have been claiming that it was one guy and they never went through with it, despite the first being utterly false and the later being something you flat made up?

Amen!
Click to expand...
Not believing they went through with it is the only position a sane person can take given the total lack of evidence they did. Do you have any? No of course not. You will never even bother to attempt to prove your conspiracy theories because even you know they are BS.

And you are done pretending that you're a Democrat? Dunno why you bothered in the first place. The only thing you convinced people of is your extreme dishonesty.
 
I read that email as someone wanting clarification on his religious stance. Are people just reading into that what they want to?
 
Travis said:
I read that email as someone wanting clarification on his religious stance. Are people just reading into that what they want to?
Click to expand...

Wait, you think an email with the subject line "no ****"' that says that asking him about his religion can "score points" with his "peeps"', that had a follow up email that said "that Jesus thing" was an attempt to obtain clarification?

That is the silliest thing I have ever read in my life.
 
Travis said:
I read that email as someone wanting clarification on his religious stance. Are people just reading into that what they want to?
Click to expand...

I've never heard of a Democrat make an issue of another candidate's religious beliefs EVER. That is par for the course for the GOP. But not for the Democrats. I'm pretty sure Debbie "Wasserman" is Jewish as is the Clinton's new son in law.
 
Tony Stark said:
In public? No in an email to a staffer.

So *********** what.
Click to expand...
Actually, and to the discredit of the people grasping on to this revelation, W-Schultz did say the same thing in public. She was clearly stating what was in her mind, a genuinely felt fact. She was at the NV convention where the action took place and she commented publicly afterward that Weaver's account of what happened was a lie.

Then there's the inconvenient little ditty that the Sanders supporters were on video acting quite aggressively.
 
The emails seem to be a bit of a news dud. Fox has tried to make hay of them. The comment on Sanders' atheism has come up.

Weaver is whining about it.

Beyond that, crickets.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
The emails seem to be a bit of a news dud. Fox has tried to make hay of them. The comment on Sanders' atheism has come up.
Click to expand...

Had any action been taken on revealing his atheism prior to the leak, this would have rocked the DNC to the core. The guy that brought it the idea up needs to go but everything else is meh.
 
Last edited:
Stacko said:
Had any action been taken on revealing his atheism prior to the leak, this would have rocked the DNC to the core. The guy that brought it the idea up needs to go but everything else is meh.
Click to expand...

How exactly would the revelation do this? Would supporters leave the party in droves, horrified that the party would allow such a person to even run? Or would they immediately switch their allegiance to Mrs Clinton? Or yawn?

:confused:
 
Gord_in_Toronto said:
How exactly would the revelation do this? Would supporters leave the party in droves, horrified that the party would allow such a person to even run? Or would they immediately switch their allegiance to Mrs Clinton? Or yawn?

:confused:
Click to expand...

Sorry messed my tenses up. Had the DNC revealed his atheism when the emails were sent, the leak of emails yesterday showing the collusion would have rocked it to the core.
 
16.5 said:
nothing to see here! all is well!

LOLZ!
Click to expand...

Amen, brother. But you tried and that's the important thing. Avid readers will recognize that it's not really important to have any actual evidence but to just keep repeating the accusations. It doesn't work with intelligent people, but dolts like Trump fall for it. You just keep shouting out those accusations. Worth at least two votes in Podunkville, ID.

Shouldn't you get back to canvassing the neighborhood for people willing to Take The Pledge to not support anyone who voted for the Pence Resolution? You and Trump, The Peace Candidate, can be mighty proud to have discovered this Drudge talking point. Constant repetition makes it actually sound, to truly ignorant voters, as though you weren't jumping up and down in your arm chairs, screaming "Get 'im..... Blow his ass up.... "


ETA: Would Avid Readers of our CT sub-forums like to recall that this whole "let's call him an atheist" master plan sounds exactly like the "proof" that was learned from the infamous "Northwoods" document.
 
Last edited:
One would think that there would be more outrage from a site full of "skeptics" regarding the obvious sneering contempt for atheists demonstrated in the incredibly cynical emails exchanged between the top staff of the DNC.

But Hillary 2016, pre-rigged for your pleasure!
 
16.5 said:
One would think that there would be more outrage from a site full of "skeptics" regarding the obvious sneering contempt for atheists demonstrated in the incredibly cynical emails exchanged between the top staff of the DNC.

But Hillary 2016, pre-rigged for your pleasure!
Click to expand...

Spare us your concern trolling.

Multiple people said they had a problem with it, as you know.

You still have not even attempted to prove your crazed conspiracy theory that the primary was rigged.
 
Last edited:
16.5 said:
Wait, you think an email with the subject line "no ****"' that says that asking him about his religion can "score points" with his "peeps"', that had a follow up email that said "that Jesus thing" was an attempt to obtain clarification?

That is the silliest thing I have ever read in my life.
Click to expand...

If he's trying to sell Bernie to his congregation then having Bernie as Jewish would be in his favor.

Why are you assuming he wants to steer his "peeps" away from Bernie?

But strange how so many still hold weird grudges against atheists.
 
I, for one, am grateful that 16.5 is speaking up for and defending atheist Jews from such scurrilous schemes plotted by the DNC. I would have hoped that liberal skeptics would do so as well, but, alas, we have proof yet again that liberalism is a faith-based collective ideology that trumps even the most personal and private beliefs of the individual.
 
Stacko said:
Sorry messed my tenses up. Had the DNC revealed his atheism when the emails were sent, the leak of emails yesterday showing the collusion would have rocked it to the core.
Click to expand...

You repeated yourself and didn't answer Gord's question.
 
sunmaster14 said:
I, for one, am grateful that 16.5 is speaking up for and defending atheist Jews from such scurrilous schemes plotted by the DNC. I would have hoped that liberal skeptics would do so as well, but, alas, we have proof yet again that liberalism is a faith-based collective ideology that trumps even the most personal and private beliefs of the individual.
Click to expand...
I posted on the first page that I had a problem with it. Others have expressed concern as well.

I just want 16.5 to prove his conspiracy theory that the primary was rigged. He hasn't even attempted to.

And 16.5 very clearly does not give a **** about this besides trying to damage the Democrats and Hillary. It could not be more obvious.
 
Last edited:
Travis said:
If he's trying to sell Bernie to his congregation then having Bernie as Jewish would be in his favor.

Why are you assuming he wants to steer his "peeps" away from Bernie?

But strange how so many still hold weird grudges against atheists.
Click to expand...

:eye-poppi
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom