Merged Wikileaks DNC leak proves primary was rigged /DNC planned to use Sanders' religion ag

Looking broadly over Clinton playing the Sanders' religion card:

This one was a staffer's idea that was nixed: UPDATE 2/11: I guess the trial balloon didn’t go over so well. The Clinton campaign is now saying that they have no plans to attack Sanders on his record with Israel.

I can't find much else without investing more time. I'll leave to others to find out if this email was any more than one DNC member's ignorant opinion/suggestion.

It's pretty obvious there was very little negative campaigning against Sanders.
 
16.5 said:
I didn't say the best, I said the most despicable.

and what is the evidence that the "plan" was not put into action?



Sounds like a plan from more than one guy.
Click to expand...
You prove that the plan was put into place.

Ooh you can't and have no evidence whatsoever to support your conspiracy theory? What a shocker.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Media blackout? :rolleyes: That was a Sanders myth.

As for voter disenfranchisement, the caucuses did more to disenfranchise voters as the results of WA State demonstrate. The voters overwhelmingly chose Clinton while the caucus attendees voted for Sanders and Sanders got the elected delegates. There was a report of an issue in one of the NY boroughs, do you have more than anecdotal complaints to back it up?

Ram-rodded state conventions? You mean in NV where Sanders' delegates tried to override the actual vote?


Edited to add: I see I am being repetitive. :p
Click to expand...

As a resident of Washington State and a Bernie supporter, I know this is totally true.
 
Hopefully, enough of the superdelegates are disgusted enough to vote for the real winner, Bernie Sanders.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Looking broadly over Clinton playing the Sanders' religion card:

This one was a staffer's idea that was nixed: UPDATE 2/11: I guess the trial balloon didn’t go over so well. The Clinton campaign is now saying that they have no plans to attack Sanders on his record with Israel.

I can't find much else without investing more time. I'll leave to others to find out if this email was any more than one DNC member's ignorant opinion/suggestion.

It's pretty obvious there was very little negative campaigning against Sanders.
Click to expand...

Already done: the reply from the CEO: Amen.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Looking broadly over Clinton playing the Sanders' religion card:

This one was a staffer's idea that was nixed: UPDATE 2/11: I guess the trial balloon didn’t go over so well. The Clinton campaign is now saying that they have no plans to attack Sanders on his record with Israel.

I can't find much else without investing more time. I'll leave to others to find out if this email was any more than one DNC member's ignorant opinion/suggestion.

It's pretty obvious there was very little negative campaigning against Sanders.
Click to expand...

They treated Bernie and his supporters with kit gloves.
 
16.5 said:
Hopefully, enough of the superdelegates are disgusted enough to vote for the real winner, Bernie Sanders.
Click to expand...

Yea, good luck with that.

Watch Bernie break in during the roll call vote when they call Vermont or New York and move that the delegates nominate by acclamation that Hillary Clinton to become the next President of the United States.

I will bet you any amount of money that this will happen.
 
I find it very hard to believe that even 16.5 could actually think that there is any chance that Hillary won't be the nominee.

She is going to be the nominee unless she gets assassinated or something. Period.
 
acbytesla said:
Yea, good luck with that.

Watch Bernie break in during the roll call vote when they call Vermont or New York and move that the delegates nominate by acclamation that Hillary Clinton to become the next President of the United States.

I will bet you any amount of money that this will happen.
Click to expand...

You don't understand the concept of hedging do you?

Say, how long do you think i will have to wait until a hillary fan shows that the plan to attack bernie as an atheist and seconded with a resounding "AMEN" by the CEO wasn't put into play?
 
16.5 said:
Wasserman called Jeff Weaver a “damn liar” and “a- - ”,

Solid analysis otherwise though....:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Who gives a ******? Lots of things are said in personal communications. Did they call each other narcissistic egotistical maniacs publicly? Did they call each other insulting nicknames like "Lying Ted" or "Crooked Christie" or refer to their spouses in a derogatory fashion? Did they accuse their parents of being Presidential Assassins?

The kind of gymnastics you go through to make these remarks is absurd and actually quite funny.
 
Last edited:
16.5 said:
You don't understand the concept of hedging do you?

Say, how long do you think i will have to wait until a hillary fan shows that the plan to attack bernie as an atheist and seconded with a resounding "AMEN" by the CEO wasn't put into play?
Click to expand...
How long are we going to wait until you show it was put into play.

Forever is my guess.
 
16.5 said:
You don't understand the concept of hedging do you?

Say, how long do you think i will have to wait until a hillary fan shows that the plan to attack bernie as an atheist and seconded with a resounding "AMEN" by the CEO wasn't put into play?
Click to expand...

You don't understand politics. You've never worked in a campaign. This kind of crap is kicked around by supporters all the time. Usually out of the earshot of their candidate because they know that the candidate themselves would get pissed and even possibly fire them. Also, they almost never carry them out...that is unless they worked for Richard Nixon.

In the end, the candidate sets the tone of a campaign. And if you're honest, not that I expect you to be, you would have to conclude that the campaign on the Democratic side was extremely civil.
 
I'm shocked to find the DNC played favorites, and not-so-secretly supported the establishment candidate.

I will also take a moment to recall the unrestrained euphoria experienced by conservatives when Obama defeated Clinton in 2008.
 
acbytesla said:
You don't understand politics. You've never worked in a campaign. This kind of crap is kicked around by supporters all the time. Usually out of the earshot of their candidate because they know that the candidate themselves would get pissed and even possibly fire them. Also, they almost never carry them out...that is unless they worked for Richard Nixon.

In the end, the candidate sets the tone of a campaign. And if you're honest, not that I expect you to be, you would have to conclude that the campaign on the Democratic side was extremely civil.
Click to expand...

BWHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! Oh man, it just don't get better than that. An admission that top DNC staff was working on Clinton's campaign...

To quote DNC CEO Amy Dacey: AMEN!!
 
Tony Stark said:
So your "evidence" that they rigged the primary against Bernie is a plan one guy came up with and that they never executed?

On par with the usual "evidence" you post for your crazed conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...

Cl1mh4224rd said:
If a thought that was never put into action is the best evidence of wrongdoing, that suggests an incredibly weak claim of wrongdoing.
Click to expand...

16.5 said:
You don't understand the concept of hedging do you?

Say, how long do you think i will have to wait until a hillary fan shows that the plan to attack bernie as an atheist and seconded with a resounding "AMEN" by the CEO wasn't put into play?
Click to expand...

TICK TOCK fellas, CEO Amy Dacey said AMEN, where is the evidence of your claims??
 
Tony Stark said:
Still not even attempting to prove your conspiracy theory I see.
Click to expand...

Tony, you claimed that the plan proposed by one top staffer and that got a resounding AMEN from the CEO (the *********** CEO!) was "never executed."

Surely, Tony Stark you have support for this.

TICK TOCK TONY!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom